[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]

Epidemiologic Trends of Chemical Ocular Burns in the United States

Educational Objective
To describe the epidemiologic trends and risk factors for chemical burns of the eye.
1 Credit CME
Key Points

Question  What populations are at highest risk for ocular chemical burns?

Findings  In a cross-sectional analysis of the US Nationwide Emergency Department Sample, children aged 1 to 2 years are at a significantly higher risk for ocular chemical burns than any other group. In general, ocular chemical burn injuries are most common among individuals aged between 18 and 64 years (73.2%).

Meaning  Children aged 1 to 2 years are at much higher risk for an ocular chemical burn than previously recognized, and effective prevention efforts must include considerations for this age group.

Abstract

Importance  Determining the national epidemiologic trends of chemical ocular burns can assist physicians and policy makers in appropriate allocation of resources for treatment and prevention.

Objective  To describe the epidemiologic trends and risk factors for chemical burns of the eye.

Design, Setting, and Participants  Between August 1, 2015, and April 25, 2016, data from the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample were analyzed from January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2013. A sample of 900 emergency departments (EDs) across the United States was used. Patients presenting to EDs with a diagnosis of alkali or acid ocular burn, chemical conjunctivitis, or a combination of nonspecific ocular chemical burn and chemical poisoning or toxic effects were eligible for inclusion. Injured patients’ age, sex, primary health care insurance, income quartile, and other demographics were described. A subset consisting of those injuries identified as alkaline or acidic burns was further characterized.

Main Outcomes and Measures  Age-specific rates of ED presentation for chemical ocular burn injuries, independent factors associated with all, alkali, and acid injuries, and total ED-associated charges.

Results  From January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2013, a total of 144 149 chemical ocular burns were diagnosed at EDs nationwide. Men represented 56.6% of all cases (n = 81 496). Median age was 32 years, with female patients presenting at a younger age than male patients (median of 32 vs 34 years; P < .001). Injury rates were highest among children aged 1 to 2 years (28.61 and 23.49 injuries per 100 000 population, respectively). Adults aged between 18 and 64 years also have these injuries at an increased rate, although this rate was half that of infants (mean, 13.28 per 100 000 population). Alkali injuries were more common than acid injuries (53.6% [n = 9137; 95% CI, 51.6%-56.0%] vs 46.4% [n = 7909; 95% CI, 44.0%-48.9%]), and all chemical eye injuries most commonly occur in residential locations (10.3% [n = 14 772]; 95% CI, 9.6%-10.9%) and among individuals in the first and second (lowest and second-lowest) income quartiles (≤$48 749) (56.0% [n = 80 691]; 95% CI, 54.4%-57.7%). Injuries most commonly occurred among those who had private health care insurance (31.9% [n = 45 900]; 95% CI, 30.9%-32.9%), and occurred more in the South (36.8% [n = 53 008]; 95% CI, 34.6%-39.1%). Emergency department charges due to these injuries totaled $106.7 million.

Conclusions and Relevance  Young children represent the single highest-risk group for ocular chemical injuries. Education and other interventions concerned with preventing these injuries will be most effective if used accordingly.

Sign in to take quiz and track your certificates

Buy This Activity
Article Information

Correction: This article was corrected on January 26, 2017, to fix editing errors in the Methods and Results sections.

Accepted for Publication: June 13, 2016.

Corresponding Author: Eric B. Schneider, PhD, Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, One Brigham Circle, 1620 Tremont St, Ste 4-020, Boston, MA 02120 (eschneider3@partners.org).

Published Online: August 4, 2016. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.2645

Author Contributions: Dr Haring and Mr Canner had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and accuracy of the data analysis.

Study concept and design: Haring, Channa, Schneider.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.

Drafting of the manuscript: Haring, Sheffield, Channa.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Haring, Channa, Canner, Schneider.

Statistical analysis: Haring, Sheffield, Schneider.

Administrative, technical, or material support: Channa, Canner.

Study supervision: Schneider.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: All authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Dr Schneider is a member of Bergeim, LLC. No other disclosures were reported.

References
1.
Cabalag  MS, Wasiak  J, Syed  Q, Paul  E, Hall  AJ, Cleland  H.  Early and late complications of ocular burn injuries.  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015;68(3):356-361. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2014.10.031.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Eslani  M, Baradaran-Rafii  A, Movahedan  A, Djalilian  AR.  The ocular surface chemical burns.  J Ophthalmol. 2014;2014:196827. doi:10.1155/2014/196827.Google ScholarCrossref
3.
Kuckelkorn  R, Kottek  A, Schrage  N, Reim  M.  Poor prognosis of severe chemical and thermal eye burns: the need for adequate emergency care and primary prevention.  Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1995;67(4):281-284.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Pfister  RR.  Chemical corneal burns.  Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1984;24(2):157-168.PubMedGoogle Scholar
5.
Schrage  NF, Langefeld  S, Zschocke  J, Kuckelkorn  R, Redbrake  C, Reim  M.  Eye burns: an emergency and continuing problem.  Burns. 2000;26(8):689-699.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Ivers  RQ, Norton  R, Cumming  RG, Butler  M, Campbell  AJ.  Visual impairment and risk of hip fracture.  Am J Epidemiol. 2000;152(7):633-639.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Press  VG, Matthiesen  MI, Ranadive  A, Hariprasad  SM, Meltzer  DO, Arora  VM.  Insights into inpatients with poor vision: a high value proposition.  J Hosp Med. 2015;10(5):311-313. doi:10.1002/jhm.2342.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Black  AA, Drager  D, Parker  L, Richardson  M, Urquhart  T, Wood  JM.  Effect of gaze position and blur on stepping accuracy in older adults.  Optom Vis Sci. 2016;93(6):560-566. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Crews  JE, Jones  GC, Kim  JH.  Double jeopardy: the effects of comorbid conditions among older people with vision loss.  J Vis Impair Blind. 2005;100(suppl):824-848, https://www.afb.org/JVIB/jvib001307.asp. Accessed June 28, 2016.Google Scholar
10.
Lee  DJ, Gómez-Marín  O, Lam  BL, Zheng  DD.  Visual acuity impairment and mortality in US adults.  Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120(11):1544-1550.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Jones  GC, Rovner  BW, Crews  JE, Danielson  ML.  Effects of depressive symptoms on health behavior practices among older adults with vision loss.  Rehabil Psychol. 2009;54(2):164-172. doi:10.1037/a0015910.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Horowitz  A.  Depression and vision and hearing impairments in later life.  Generations. 2003;27(1):32-38.Google Scholar
13.
Court  H, McLean  G, Guthrie  B, Mercer  SW, Smith  DJ.  Visual impairment is associated with physical and mental comorbidities in older adults: a cross-sectional study.  BMC Med. 2014;12:181. doi:10.1186/s12916-014-0181-7.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Hodgson  N, Wu  F, Zhu  J,  et al.  Economic and quality of life benefits of anti-VEGF therapy [published online February 25, 2016].  Mol Pharm. doi:10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5b00775.PubMedGoogle Scholar
15.
Hayes  A, Arima  H, Woodward  M,  et al.  Changes in quality of life associated with complications of diabetes: results from the ADVANCE study.  Value Health. 2016;19(1):36-41. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2015.10.010.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Green  D, Ducorroy  G, McElnea  E,  et al The cost of blindness in the Republic of Ireland 2010-2020.  J Ophthalmol. 2016;2016:4691276. doi:10.1155/2016/4691276Google ScholarCrossref
17.
Hall  AH. Epidemiology of ocular chemical burn injuries. In: Schrage  N, Burgher  F, Blomet  J,  et al, eds.  Chemical Ocular Burns. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 2011:9-15, http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-642-14550-6_2. Accessed August 4, 2015.
18.
Sher  LM, Taylor  DM, Robinson  J,  et al.  The epidemiology of chemical eye exposures reported to the Victorian Poisons Information Centre.  Eur J Emerg Med. 2012;19(6):389-394. doi:10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32834e912a.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Pargament  JM, Armenia  J, Nerad  JA.  Physical and chemical injuries to eyes and eyelids.  Clin Dermatol. 2015;33(2):234-237. doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2014.10.015.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Rozenbaum  D, Baruchin  AM, Dafna  Z.  Chemical burns of the eye with special reference to alkali burns.  Burns. 1991;17(2):136-140.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Kuckelkorn  R, Makropoulos  W, Kottek  A, Reim  M.  Retrospective study of severe alkali burns of the eyes [in German].  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1993;203(6):397-402.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Bunker  DJL, George  RJ, Kleinschmidt  A, Kumar  RJ, Maitz  P.  Alkali-related ocular burns: a case series and review.  J Burn Care Res. 2014;35(3):261-268.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
McKenzie  LB, Ahir  N, Stolz  U, Nelson  NG.  Household cleaning product-related injuries treated in US emergency departments in 1990-2006.  Pediatrics. 2010;126(3):509-516.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Bureau of Labor Statistics, US Department of Labor. Nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses requiring days away from work, 2014 [news release]. Washington, DC: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; November 19, 2015. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/osh2.pdf. Accessed June 23, 2016.
25.
Spector  J, Fernandez  WG.  Chemical, thermal, and biological ocular exposures.  Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2008;26(1):125-136. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Wong  TY, Klein  BE, Klein  R.  The prevalence and 5-year incidence of ocular trauma: the Beaver Dam Eye Study.  Ophthalmology. 2000;107(12):2196-2202.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Fitzgerald O’Connor  E, Frew  Q, Din  A,  et al.  Periorbital burns—a 6 year review of management and outcome.  Burns. 2015;41(3):616-623.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Mowry  JB, Spyker  DA, Cantilena  LR  Jr, McMillan  N, Ford  M.  2013 Annual report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers’ National Poison Data System (NPDS): 31st annual report.  Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2014;52(10):1032-1283.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. Overview of the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS). 2014. https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/nedsoverview.jsp. Accessed June 23, 2016.
30.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM). http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/icd/icd9cm.htm. Accessed February 22, 2016.
31.
US Census Bureau. Population estimates. http://www.census.gov/popest/data/intercensal/. Published 2012. Accessed April 7, 2014.
32.
Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. NEDS description of data elements. 2015. https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/vars/zipinc_qrtl/nedsnote.jsp. Accessed June 23, 2016.
33.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. Health, United States, 2015—working-age adults. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/hus/working.htm. Updated April 27, 2016. Accessed May 31, 2016.
34.
Godwin  RH.  Child-resistant locks in poison control.  Pediatrics. 1978;61(5):750-752.PubMedGoogle Scholar
35.
Heilbronn  CM, Svider  PF, Folbe  AJ,  et al.  Burns in the head and neck: a national representative analysis of emergency department visits.  Laryngoscope. 2015;125(7):1573-1578. doi:10.1002/lary.25132.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
36.
Gielen  AC, McDonald  EM, Forrest  CB, Harvilchuck  JD, Wissow  L.  Injury prevention counseling in an urban pediatric clinic. Analysis of audiotaped visits.  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997;151(2):146-151.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
37.
Al-Moujahed  A, Chodosh  J.  Outcomes of an algorithmic approach to treating mild ocular alkali burns.  JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015;133(10):1214-1216. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.2302.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
38.
Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Department of Labor. Employer payment for personal protective equipment. Federal Register. 2007;72(220):64342-64430. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2007-11-15/pdf/07-5608.pdf. Accessed June 28, 2016.
39.
Haut  ER, Pronovost  PJ, Schneider  EB.  Limitations of administrative databases.  JAMA. 2012;307(24):2589.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
If you are not a JN Learning subscriber, you can either:
Subscribe to JN Learning for one year
Buy this activity
jn-learning_Modal_LoginSubscribe_Purchase
If you are not a JN Learning subscriber, you can either:
Subscribe to JN Learning for one year
Buy this activity
jn-learning_Modal_LoginSubscribe_Purchase
With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Education Center Collection Sign In Modal Right

Name Your Search

Save Search
With a personal account, you can:
  • Track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
jn-learning_Modal_SaveSearch_NoAccess_Purchase

Lookup An Activity

or

My Saved Searches

You currently have no searches saved.

With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Education Center Collection Sign In Modal Right
Topics
State Requirements