Effect of General Anesthesia and Conscious Sedation on Infarct Growth and Outcomes in Stroke | Anesthesiology | JN Learning | AMA Ed Hub [Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]

Effect of General Anesthesia and Conscious Sedation During Endovascular Therapy on Infarct Growth and Clinical Outcomes in Acute Ischemic StrokeA Randomized Clinical Trial

Educational Objective
To investigate whether the type of anesthesia used during endovascular therapy for stroke affects infarct growth.
1 Credit CME
Key Points

Question  Does infarct growth depend on the type of anesthesia used during endovascular therapy for stroke?

Findings  In this randomized, open-label clinical trial including 128 patients, no difference in infarct growth was found between patients randomized to the general anesthesia group and those randomized to the conscious sedation group.

Meaning  General anesthesia does not result in more infarct growth compared with conscious sedation during endovascular therapy for stroke.


Importance  Endovascular therapy (EVT) is the standard of care for select patients who had a stroke caused by a large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation, but there is uncertainty regarding the optimal anesthetic approach during EVT. Observational studies suggest that general anesthesia (GA) is associated with worse outcomes compared with conscious sedation (CS).

Objective  To examine the effect of type of anesthesia during EVT on infarct growth and clinical outcome.

Design, Setting, and Participants  The General or Local Anesthesia in Intra Arterial Therapy (GOLIATH) trial was a single-center prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end-point evaluation that enrolled patients from March 12, 2015, to February 2, 2017. Although the trial screened 1501 patients, it included 128 consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by large vessel occlusions in the anterior circulation within 6 hours of onset; 1372 patients who did not fulfill inclusion criteria and 1 who did not provide consent were excluded. Primary analysis was unadjusted and according to the intention-to-treat principle.

Interventions  Patients were randomized to either the GA group or the CS group (1:1 allocation) before EVT.

Main Outcomes and Measures  The primary end point was infarct growth between magnetic resonance imaging scans performed before EVT and 48 to 72 hours after EVT. The hypothesis formulated before data collection was that patients who were under CS would have less infarct growth.

Results  Of 128 patients included in the trial, 65 were randomized to GA, and 63 were randomized to CS. For the entire cohort, the mean (SD) age was 71.4 (11.4) years, and 62 (48.4%) were women. Baseline demographic and clinical variables were balanced between the GA and CS treatment arms. The median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 18 (interquartile range [IQR], 14-21). Four patients (6.3%) in the CS group were converted to the GA group. Successful reperfusion was significantly higher in the GA arm than in the CS arm (76.9% vs 60.3%; P = .04). The difference in the volume of infarct growth among patients treated under GA or CS did not reach statistical significance (median [IQR] growth, 8.2 [2.2-38.6] mL vs 19.4 [2.4-79.0] mL; P = .10). There were better clinical outcomes in the GA group, with an odds ratio for a shift to a lower modified Rankin Scale score of 1.91 (95% CI, 1.03-3.56).

Conclusions and Relevance  For patients who underwent thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke caused by large vessel occlusions in the anterior circulation, GA did not result in worse tissue or clinical outcomes compared with CS.

Trial Registration  clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02317237

Sign in to take quiz and track your certificates

Buy This Activity

JN Learning™ is the home for CME and MOC from the JAMA Network. Search by specialty or US state and earn AMA PRA Category 1 CME Credit™ from articles, audio, Clinical Challenges and more. Learn more about CME/MOC

Article Information

Accepted for Publication: November 8, 2017.

Corresponding Author: Claus Z. Simonsen, MD, PhD, Department of Neurology, Danish Stroke Center, Aarhus University Hospital, Norrebrogade 44, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark (clasim@rm.dk).

Published Online: January 16, 2018. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.4474

Author Contributions: Drs Simonsen and Johnsen had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Study concept and design: Simonsen, Sørensen, Juul, Johnsen, Rasmussen.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Simonsen, Yoo, Sørensen, Johnsen, Rasmussen.

Drafting of the manuscript: Simonsen, Yoo, Sørensen, Juul, Andersen, Rasmussen.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Simonsen, Yoo, Sørensen, Juul, Johnsen, Rasmussen.

Statistical analysis: Simonsen, Yoo, Johnsen.

Obtained funding: Andersen, Rasmussen.

Administrative, technical, or material support: Sørensen, Juul, Rasmussen.

Study supervision: Juul, Johnsen, Rasmussen.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Yoo reported receiving a research grant from Penumbra Inc and Neuravi Inc. Dr Rasmussen reported receiving a research grant from Health Research Fund of Central Denmark Region. No other disclosures were reported.

Funding/Support: This trial was funded by Aarhus University Hospital.

Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funding source had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Berkhemer  OA, Fransen  PS, Beumer  D,  et al; MR CLEAN Investigators.  A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke.  N Engl J Med. 2015;372(1):11-20.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Goyal  M, Menon  BK, van Zwam  WH,  et al; HERMES collaborators.  Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials.  Lancet. 2016;387(10029):1723-1731.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Powers  WJ, Derdeyn  CP, Biller  J,  et al; American Heart Association Stroke Council.  2015 American Heart Association/American Stroke Association focused update of the 2013 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke regarding endovascular treatment: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.  Stroke. 2015;46(10):3020-3035.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Abou-Chebl  A, Lin  R, Hussain  MS,  et al.  Conscious sedation versus general anesthesia during endovascular therapy for acute anterior circulation stroke: preliminary results from a retrospective, multicenter study.  Stroke. 2010;41(6):1175-1179.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Brinjikji  W, Murad  MH, Rabinstein  AA, Cloft  HJ, Lanzino  G, Kallmes  DF.  Conscious sedation versus general anesthesia during endovascular acute ischemic stroke treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36(3):525-529.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Abou-Chebl  A, Zaidat  OO, Castonguay  AC,  et al.  North American SOLITAIRE Stent-Retriever Acute Stroke Registry: choice of anesthesia and outcomes.  Stroke. 2014;45(5):1396-1401.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Bekelis  K, Missios  S, MacKenzie  TA, Tjoumakaris  S, Jabbour  P.  Anesthesia technique and outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke.  Stroke. 2017;48(2):361-366.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Schönenberger  S, Uhlmann  L, Hacke  W,  et al.  Effect of conscious sedation vs general anesthesia on early neurological improvement among patients with ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular thrombectomy: a randomized clinical trial.  JAMA. 2016;316(19):1986-1996.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Löwhagen Hendén  P, Rentzos  A, Karlsson  JE,  et al.  General anesthesia versus conscious sedation for endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke: the AnStroke trial (anesthesia during stroke).  Stroke. 2017;48(6):1601-1607.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Simonsen  CZ, Sørensen  LH, Juul  N,  et al.  Anesthetic strategy during endovascular therapy: General anesthesia or conscious sedation? (GOLIATH–General or Local Anesthesia in Intra Arterial Therapy) a single-center randomized trial.  Int J Stroke. 2016;11(9):1045-1052.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Zaidat  OO, Yoo  AJ, Khatri  P,  et al; Cerebral Angiographic Revascularization Grading (CARG) Collaborators; STIR Revascularization Working Group; STIR Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) Task Force.  Recommendations on angiographic revascularization grading standards for acute ischemic stroke: a consensus statement.  Stroke. 2013;44(9):2650-2663.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Mundiyanapurath  S, Schönenberger  S, Rosales  ML,  et al.  Circulatory and respiratory parameters during acute endovascular stroke therapy in conscious sedation or general anesthesia.  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;24(6):1244-1249.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Berkhemer  OA, van den Berg  LA, Fransen  PS,  et al; MR CLEAN investigators.  The effect of anesthetic management during intra-arterial therapy for acute stroke in MR CLEAN.  Neurology. 2016;87(7):656-664.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Jumaa  MA, Zhang  F, Ruiz-Ares  G,  et al.  Comparison of safety and clinical and radiographic outcomes in endovascular acute stroke therapy for proximal middle cerebral artery occlusion with intubation and general anesthesia versus the nonintubated state.  Stroke. 2010;41(6):1180-1184.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Abou-Chebl  A, Yeatts  SD, Yan  B,  et al.  Impact of general anesthesia on safety and outcomes in the endovascular arm of Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) III trial.  Stroke. 2015;46(8):2142-2148.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
McDonald  JS, Brinjikji  W, Rabinstein  AA, Cloft  HJ, Lanzino  G, Kallmes  DF.  Conscious sedation versus general anaesthesia during mechanical thrombectomy for stroke: a propensity score analysis.  J Neurointerv Surg. 2015;7(11):789-794.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Davis  MJ, Menon  BK, Baghirzada  LB,  et al; Calgary Stroke Program.  Anesthetic management and outcome in patients during endovascular therapy for acute stroke.  Anesthesiology. 2012;116(2):396-405.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Treurniet  KM, Berkhemer  OA, Immink  RV,  et al; MR CLEAN investigators.  A decrease in blood pressure is associated with unfavorable outcome in patients undergoing thrombectomy under general anesthesia  [published online April 12, 2017].  J Neurointerv Surg. doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-012988PubMedGoogle Scholar
Löwhagen Hendén  P, Rentzos  A, Karlsson  JE,  et al.  Hypotension during endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke is a risk factor for poor neurological outcome.  Stroke. 2015;46(9):2678-2680.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Whalin  MK, Halenda  KM, Haussen  DC,  et al.  Even small decreases in blood pressure during conscious sedation affect clinical outcome after stroke thrombectomy: an analysis of hemodynamic thresholds.  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017;38(2):294-298.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Talke  PO, Sharma  D, Heyer  EJ, Bergese  SD, Blackham  KA, Stevens  RD.  Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care Expert consensus statement: anesthetic management of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke.  J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2014;26(2):95-108.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Saver  JL, Goyal  M, Bonafe  A,  et al; SWIFT PRIME Investigators.  Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke.  N Engl J Med. 2015;372(24):2285-2295.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Oshima  T, Karasawa  F, Satoh  T.  Effects of propofol on cerebral blood flow and the metabolic rate of oxygen in humans.  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002;46(7):831-835.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Zwerus  R, Absalom  A.  Update on anesthetic neuroprotection.  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2015;28(4):424-430.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Sivasankar  C, Stiefel  M, Miano  TA,  et al.  Anesthetic variation and potential impact of anesthetics used during endovascular management of acute ischemic stroke.  J Neurointerv Surg. 2016;8(11):1101-1106.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
If you are not a JN Learning subscriber, you can either:
Subscribe to JN Learning for one year
Buy this activity
If you are not a JN Learning subscriber, you can either:
Subscribe to JN Learning for one year
Buy this activity
With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Education Center Collection Sign In Modal Right

Name Your Search

Save Search
With a personal account, you can:
  • Track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience

Lookup An Activity



My Saved Searches

You currently have no searches saved.

With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Education Center Collection Sign In Modal Right