Want to take quizzes and track your credits?
What are the rates of discontinuation or initiation of antidiabetes treatment 6 years after bariatric surgery?
In this nationwide population-based cohort study of more than 30 000 adults, bariatric surgery was associated with a significantly higher 6-year postoperative antidiabetes treatment discontinuation rate compared with an obese control group, as well as with a low antidiabetes treatment initiation rate, with gastric bypass being the most effective procedure.
Patients and physicians should be aware that morbid obesity remains a chronic disease even after bariatric surgery because 50.1% of patients with preexisting antidiabetes treatment remained on treatment 6 years after surgery.
Few large-scale long-term prospective cohort studies have assessed changes in antidiabetes treatment after bariatric surgery.
To describe the association between bariatric surgery and rates of continuation, discontinuation, or initiation of antidiabetes treatment 6 years after bariatric surgery compared with a matched control obese group.
Design, Setting, and Participants
This nationwide observational population-based cohort study extracted health care reimbursement data from the French national health insurance database from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2015. All patients undergoing primary bariatric surgery in France between January 1 and December 31, 2009, were matched on age, sex, body mass index category, and antidiabetes treatment with control patients hospitalized for obesity in 2009 with no bariatric surgery between 2005 and 2015.
Bariatric surgery, including adjustable gastric banding (AGB), gastric bypass (GBP), and sleeve gastrectomy (SG).
Main Outcome and Measure
Reimbursement for antidiabetes drugs. Mixed-effects logistic regression models estimated factors of discontinuation or initiation of antidiabetes treatment over a period of 6 years.
In 2009, a total of 15 650 patients (mean [SD] age, 38.9 [11.2] years; 84.6% female; 1633 receiving antidiabetes treatment) underwent primary bariatric surgery, with 48.5% undergoing AGB, 27.7% undergoing GBP, and 22.0% undergoing SG. Among patients receiving antidiabetes treatment at baseline, the antidiabetes treatment discontinuation rate was higher 6 years after bariatric surgery than in controls (−49.9% vs −9.0%, P < .001). In multivariable analysis, the main predictive factors for discontinuation were the following: GBP (odds ratio [OR], 16.7; 95% CI, 13.0-21.4), SG (OR, 7.30; 95% CI, 5.50-9.50), and AGB (OR, 4.30; 95% CI, 3.30-5.60) compared with no bariatric surgery, as well as insulin use (OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.13-0.22), dual therapy without insulin (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.32-0.45) vs monotherapy, lipid-lowering treatment (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.63-0.91), antidepressant treatment (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.55-0.81), and age (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.95-0.97) per year. For patients without antidiabetes treatment at baseline, the 6-year antidiabetes treatment initiation rate was much lower after bariatric surgery than in controls (1.4% vs 12.0%, P < .001). In multivariable analysis, protective factors were GBP (OR, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.04-0.09), SG (OR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.06-0.11), and AGB (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.14-0.20) vs controls, and risk factors were as follows: body mass index category (OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.68-2.47 for ≥50.0 vs 30.0-39.9 and OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.49-1.90 for 40.0-49.9 vs 30.0-39.9), antihypertensive treatment (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.33-1.67), low income (OR, 1.43; 95 % CI, 1.26-1.62), and age (OR, 1.04; 95 % CI, 1.03-1.05) per year.
Conclusions and Relevance
Bariatric surgery was associated with a significantly higher 6-year postoperative antidiabetes treatment discontinuation rate compared with baseline and with an obese control group without bariatric surgery.
Sign in to take quiz and track your certificates
JN Learning™ is the home for CME and MOC from the JAMA Network. Search by specialty or US state and earn AMA PRA Category 1 CME Credit™ from articles, audio, Clinical Challenges and more. Learn more about CME/MOC
Accepted for Publication: November 5, 2017.
Corresponding Author: Anne Fagot-Campagna, MD, PhD, Department of Statistics, Caisse Nationale d’Assurance Maladie des Travailleurs Salariés, 50 Ave du Professeur André Lemierre, 75896 Paris CEDEX 20, France (firstname.lastname@example.org).
Published Online: February 14, 2018. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2017.6163
Author Contributions: Mr Lesuffleur and Dr Fagot-Campagna had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of data analysis.
Study concept and design: Thereaux, Czernichow, Basdevant, Nocca, Millat, Fagot-Campagna.
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Thereaux, Lesuffleur, Czernichow, Msika, Fagot-Campagna.
Drafting of the manuscript: Thereaux, Lesuffleur, Nocca.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Thereaux, Czernichow, Basdevant, Msika, Millat, Fagot-Campagna.
Statistical analysis: Lesuffleur, Fagot-Campagna.
Administrative, technical, or material support: Fagot-Campagna.
Study supervision: Thereaux, Basdevant, Msika, Nocca, Millat, Fagot-Campagna.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.
You currently have no searches saved.