[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]

Accuracy of Pediatric Trauma Field TriageA Systematic Review

Educational Objective To identify the accuracy of prehospital trauma triage and diagnostic tests for identifying children who need specialized trauma care.
1 Credit CME
Key Points

Question  What is the accuracy of prehospital trauma triage and diagnostic tests for identifying children in need of specialized trauma care?

Findings  In this systematic review, no field triage protocol was both highly sensitive and specific for classifying the need of specialized pediatric trauma care; no protocol alone complied with the international standard of at least 95% sensitivity. Regional triage quality regarding initial transportation destination was unknown.

Meaning  Inability of field triage protocols to identify children in need of specialized trauma care can lead to an incorrect choice of initial destination hospital, and this incorrect choice has been associated with higher mortality rates and increased costs.

Abstract

Importance  Field triage of pediatric patients with trauma is critical for transporting the right patient to the right hospital. Mortality and lifelong disabilities are potentially attributable to erroneously transporting a patient in need of specialized care to a lower-level trauma center.

Objective  To quantify the accuracy of field triage and associated diagnostic protocols used to identify children in need of specialized trauma care.

Evidence Review  MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials were searched from database inception to November 6, 2017, for studies describing the accuracy of diagnostic tests to identify children in need of specialized trauma care in a prehospital setting. Identified articles with a study population including patients not transported by emergency medical services were excluded. Quality assessment was performed using a modified version of the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies–2.

Findings  After deduplication, 1430 relevant articles were assessed, a full-text review of 38 articles was conducted, and 5 of those articles were included. All studies were observational, published between 1996 and 2017, and conducted in the United States, and data collection was prospective in 1 study. Three different protocols were studied that analyzed a combined total of 1222 children in need of specialized trauma care. One protocol was specifically developed for a pediatric out-of-hospital cohort. The percentage of pediatric patients requiring specialized trauma care in each study varied between 2.6% (110 of 4197) and 54.7% (58 of 106). The sensitivity of the prehospital triage tools ranged from 49.1% to 87.3%, and the specificity ranged from 41.7% to 84.8%. No prehospital triage protocol alone complied with the international standard of 95% or greater sensitivity. Undertriage and overtriage rates, representative of the quality of the full diagnostic strategy to transport a patient to the right hospital, were not reported for inclusive trauma systems or emergency medical services regions.

Conclusions and Relevance  It is crucial to transport the right patient to the right hospital. Yet the quality of the full diagnostic strategy to determine the optimal receiving hospital is unknown. None of the investigated field triage protocols complied with current sensitivity targets. Improved efforts are needed to develop accurate child-specific tools to prevent undertriage and its potential life-threatening consequences.

Sign in to take quiz and track your certificates

Buy This Activity

JN Learning™ is the home for CME and MOC from the JAMA Network. Search by specialty or US state and earn AMA PRA Category 1 CME Credit™ from articles, audio, Clinical Challenges and more. Learn more about CME/MOC

Article Information

Accepted for Publication: March 9, 2018.

Corresponding Author: Rogier van der Sluijs, MD, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Ste Q02.2.301, Utrecht, the Netherlands (r.vandersluijs@umcutrecht.nl).

Published Online: May 16, 2018. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2018.1050

Author Contributions: Dr van der Sluijs had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Study concept and design: All authors.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: van der Sluijs, van Rein, Wijnand, van Heijl.

Drafting of the manuscript: van der Sluijs, Wijnand.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.

Statistical analysis: van der Sluijs.

Administrative, technical, or material support: van Heijl.

Study supervision: Wijnand, Leenen, van Heijl.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

References
1.
Peden M, Oyegbite K, Ozanne-Smith J, et al, eds.  World Report on Child Injury Prevention. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2008.
2.
Amini  R, Lavoie  A, Moore  L, Sirois  MJ, Emond  M.  Pediatric trauma mortality by type of designated hospital in a mature inclusive trauma system.  J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2011;4(1):12-19.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Pracht  EE, Tepas  JJ  III, Langland-Orban  B, Simpson  L, Pieper  P, Flint  LM.  Do pediatric patients with trauma in Florida have reduced mortality rates when treated in designated trauma centers?  J Pediatr Surg. 2008;43(1):212-221.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Potoka  DA, Schall  LC, Gardner  MJ, Stafford  PW, Peitzman  AB, Ford  HR.  Impact of pediatric trauma centers on mortality in a statewide system.  J Trauma. 2000;49(2):237-245.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Sathya  C, Alali  AS, Wales  PW,  et al.  Mortality among injured children treated at different trauma center types.  JAMA Surg. 2015;150(9):874-881.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Newgard  CD, Staudenmayer  K, Hsia  RY,  et al.  The cost of overtriage: more than one-third of low-risk injured patients were taken to major trauma centers.  Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32(9):1591-1599.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Sampalis  JS, Denis  R, Fréchette  P, Brown  R, Fleiszer  D, Mulder  D.  Direct transport to tertiary trauma centers versus transfer from lower level facilities: impact on mortality and morbidity among patients with major trauma.  J Trauma. 1997;43(2):288-295.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Nirula  R, Maier  R, Moore  E, Sperry  J, Gentilello  L.  Scoop and run to the trauma center or stay and play at the local hospital: hospital transfer’s effect on mortality.  J Trauma. 2010;69(3):595-599.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Leeflang  MM, Bossuyt  PM, Irwig  L.  Diagnostic test accuracy may vary with prevalence: implications for evidence-based diagnosis.  J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(1):5-12.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
van Rein  EAJ, Houwert  RM, Gunning  AC, Lichtveld  RA, Leenen  LPH, van Heijl  M.  Accuracy of prehospital triage protocols in selecting severely injured patients: A systematic review.  J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;83(2):328-339.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Moher  D, Liberati  A, Tetzlaff  J, Altman  DG; PRISMA Group.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.  BMJ. 2009;339:b2535.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Bossuyt  PM, Reitsma  JB, Bruns  DE,  et al; STARD Group.  STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies.  BMJ. 2015;351:h5527.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Whiting  PF, Rutjes  AW, Westwood  ME,  et al; QUADAS-2 Group.  QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies.  Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(8):529-536.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Lerner  EB, Drendel  AL, Cushman  JT,  et al.  Ability of the physiologic criteria of the field triage guidelines to identify children who need the resources of a trauma center.  Prehosp Emerg Care. 2017;21(2):180-184.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Newgard  CD, Fu  R, Zive  D,  et al.  Prospective validation of the national field triage guidelines for identifying seriously injured persons.  J Am Coll Surg. 2016;222(2):146-158.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Newgard  CD, Zive  D, Holmes  JF,  et al; WESTRN investigators.  A multisite assessment of the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma field triage decision scheme for identifying seriously injured children and adults.  J Am Coll Surg. 2011;213(6):709-721.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Phillips  S, Rond  PC  III, Kelly  SM, Swartz  PD.  The need for pediatric-specific triage criteria: results from the Florida Trauma Triage Study.  Pediatr Emerg Care. 1996;12(6):394-399.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Johnson  WP.  Evaluation of the Pediatric Trauma Triage Checklist as a prehospital pediatric trauma triage tool for the state of Florida.  Prehosp Disaster Med. 1996;11(1):20-25.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
MacKenzie  EJ, Steinwachs  DM, Ramzy  AI.  Evaluating performance of statewide regionalized systems of trauma care.  J Trauma. 1990;30(6):681-688.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Di Bartolomeo  S, Tillati  S, Valent  F, Zanier  L, Barbone  F.  ISS mapped from ICD-9-CM by a novel freeware versus traditional coding: a comparative study.  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2010;18:17.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Tepas  JJ  III, Mollitt  DL, Talbert  JL, Bryant  M.  The pediatric trauma score as a predictor of injury severity in the injured child.  J Pediatr Surg. 1987;22(1):14-18.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Kaufmann  CR, Maier  RV, Rivara  FP, Carrico  CJ.  Evaluation of the Pediatric Trauma Score.  JAMA. 1990;263(1):69-72.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
Mackersie  RC.  History of trauma field triage development and the American College of Surgeons criteria.  Prehosp Emerg Care. 2006;10(3):287-294.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. Resources for optimal care of the injured patient 2014. https://www.facs.org/~/media/files/quality%20programs/trauma/vrc%20resources/resources%20for%20optimal%20care.ashx. Accessed December 10, 2017.
25.
MacKenzie  EJ, Rivara  FP, Jurkovich  GJ,  et al.  A national evaluation of the effect of trauma-center care on mortality.  N Engl J Med. 2006;354(4):366-378.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Janssens  L, Holtslag  HR, van Beeck  EF, Leenen  LP.  The effects of regionalization of pediatric trauma care in the Netherlands: a surveillance-based before-after study.  J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(5):1284-1287.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Nakamura  Y, Daya  M, Bulger  EM,  et al; WESTRN Investigators.  Evaluating age in the field triage of injured persons.  Ann Emerg Med. 2012;60(3):335-345.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Peng  J, Wheeler  K, Groner  JI, Haley  KJ, Xiang  H.  Undertriage of pediatric major trauma patients in the United States.  Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2017;56(9):845-853.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Xiang  H, Wheeler  KK, Groner  JI, Shi  J, Haley  KJ.  Undertriage of major trauma patients in the US emergency departments.  Am J Emerg Med. 2014;32(9):997-1004.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Corrado  MM, Shi  J, Wheeler  KK,  et al.  Emergency medical services (EMS) versus non-EMS transport among injured children in the United States.  Am J Emerg Med. 2017;35(3):475-478.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
31.
Cicero  MX, Cross  KP.  Predictive value of initial Glasgow coma scale score in pediatric trauma patients.  Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013;29(1):43-48.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Newgard  CD, Rudser  K, Atkins  DL,  et al; ROC Investigators.  The availability and use of out-of-hospital physiologic information to identify high-risk injured children in a multisite, population-based cohort.  Prehosp Emerg Care. 2009;13(4):420-431.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
33.
Fleming  S, Thompson  M, Stevens  R,  et al.  Normal ranges of heart rate and respiratory rate in children from birth to 18 years of age: a systematic review of observational studies.  Lancet. 2011;377(9770):1011-1018.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
34.
Petrosyan  M, Guner  YS, Emami  CN, Ford  HR.  Disparities in the delivery of pediatric trauma care.  J Trauma. 2009;67(2)(suppl):S114-S119.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
35.
Oudega  R, Moons  KG, Hoes  AW.  Limited value of patient history and physical examination in diagnosing deep vein thrombosis in primary care.  Fam Pract. 2005;22(1):86-91.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
If you are not a JN Learning subscriber, you can either:
Subscribe to JN Learning for one year
Buy this activity
jn-learning_Modal_LoginSubscribe_Purchase
If you are not a JN Learning subscriber, you can either:
Subscribe to JN Learning for one year
Buy this activity
jn-learning_Modal_LoginSubscribe_Purchase
With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Education Center Collection Sign In Modal Right

Name Your Search

Save Search
With a personal account, you can:
  • Track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
jn-learning_Modal_SaveSearch_NoAccess_Purchase

Lookup An Activity

or

My Saved Searches

You currently have no searches saved.

With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Education Center Collection Sign In Modal Right
Topics
State Requirements