[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]

Association of Frequency of Organic Food Consumption With Cancer RiskFindings From the NutriNet-Santé Prospective Cohort Study

Educational Objective
To prospectively investigate the association between organic food consumption and the risk of cancer in a large cohort of French adults.
1 Credit CME
Key Points

Question  What is the association between an organic food–based diet (ie, a diet less likely to contain pesticide residues) and cancer risk?

Findings  In a population-based cohort study of 68 946 French adults, a significant reduction in the risk of cancer was observed among high consumers of organic food.

Meaning  A higher frequency of organic food consumption was associated with a reduced risk of cancer; if the findings are confirmed, research investigating the underlying factors involved with this association is needed to implement adapted and targeted public health measures for cancer prevention.

Abstract

Importance  Although organic foods are less likely to contain pesticide residues than conventional foods, few studies have examined the association of organic food consumption with cancer risk.

Objective  To prospectively investigate the association between organic food consumption and the risk of cancer in a large cohort of French adults.

Design, Setting, and Participants  In this population-based prospective cohort study among French adult volunteers, data were included from participants with available information on organic food consumption frequency and dietary intake. For 16 products, participants reported their consumption frequency of labeled organic foods (never, occasionally, or most of the time). An organic food score was then computed (range, 0-32 points). The follow-up dates were May 10, 2009, to November 30, 2016.

Main Outcomes and Measures  This study estimated the risk of cancer in association with the organic food score (modeled as quartiles) using Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusted for potential cancer risk factors.

Results  Among 68 946 participants (78.0% female; mean [SD] age at baseline, 44.2 [14.5] years), 1340 first incident cancer cases were identified during follow-up, with the most prevalent being 459 breast cancers, 180 prostate cancers, 135 skin cancers, 99 colorectal cancers, 47 non-Hodgkin lymphomas, and 15 other lymphomas. High organic food scores were inversely associated with the overall risk of cancer (hazard ratio for quartile 4 vs quartile 1, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.63-0.88; P for trend = .001; absolute risk reduction, 0.6%; hazard ratio for a 5-point increase, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.88-0.96).

Conclusions and Relevance  A higher frequency of organic food consumption was associated with a reduced risk of cancer. If these findings are confirmed, further research is necessary to determine the underlying factors involved in this association.

Sign in to take quiz and track your certificates

Buy This Activity

JN Learning™ is the home for CME and MOC from the JAMA Network. Search by specialty or US state and earn AMA PRA Category 1 CME Credit™ from articles, audio, Clinical Challenges and more. Learn more about CME/MOC

Article Information

Accepted for Publication: July 10, 2018.

Correction: This article was corrected on December 3, 2018, to reword the conclusions paragraphs in the abstract and key points, and to fix a data display problem in Table 1.

Corresponding Author: Julia Baudry, PhD, Centre de Recherche Epidémiologie et Statistique Sorbonne Paris Cité, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U1153, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA) U1125, Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers, Université Paris 13, Equipe de Recherche en Epidémiologie Nutritionnelle, 74 rue Marcel Cachin, 93017 Bobigny, France (j.baudry@eren.smbh.univ-paris13.fr).

Published Online: October 22, 2018. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4357

Author Contributions: Dr Kesse-Guyot had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Concept and design: Touvier, Galan, Hercberg, Lairon, Kesse-Guyot.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.

Drafting of the manuscript: Baudry, Kesse-Guyot.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Assmann, Touvier, Allès, Seconda, Latino-Martel, Ezzedine, Galan, Hercberg, Lairon, Kesse-Guyot.

Statistical analysis: Baudry, Kesse-Guyot.

Obtained funding: Galan, Hercberg, Kesse-Guyot.

Administrative, technical, or material support: Galan, Kesse-Guyot.

Supervision: Touvier, Galan, Hercberg, Kesse-Guyot.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Lairon reported serving since 2018 as a scientific expert, with no honoraria or personal funding, in 2 nonprofit foundations recently funded in France (“Fondation Bjorg, Bonneterre et Citoyens” and “Fond de Dotation Institut de l’Alimentation Bio”). No other disclosures were reported.

Funding/Support: The NutriNet-Santé study is supported by the French Ministry of Health, French Institute for Health Surveillance, National Institute for Prevention and Health Education, National Institute for Health and Medical Research, National Institute for Agricultural Research, National Conservatory of Arts and Crafts, and Paris 13 University. Dr Baudry was funded by grant ANR-13-ALID-0001 from the French National Research Agency (Agence Nationale de la Recherche) in the context of the 2013 Programme de Recherche Systèmes Alimentaires Durables.

Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funding sources had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

References
1.
Ferlay  J, Soerjomataram  I, Dikshit  R,  et al.  Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.  Int J Cancer. 2015;136(5):E359-E386. doi:10.1002/ijc.29210PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
World Health Organization. International Agency for Research on Cancer. https://www.iarc.fr/. Accessed August 4, 2017.
3.
Dossier: par INSERM [salle de presse]. Pesticides: effets sur la santé, une expertise collective de l’INSERM. http://presse.inserm.fr/pesticides-effets-sur-la-sante-une-expertise-collective-de-linserm/8463/. Published June 13, 2013. Accessed August 21, 2016.
4.
Mostafalou  S, Abdollahi  M.  Pesticides: an update of human exposure and toxicity.  Arch Toxicol. 2017;91(2):549-599. doi:10.1007/s00204-016-1849-xPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Graillot  V, Takakura  N, Hegarat  LL, Fessard  V, Audebert  M, Cravedi  JP.  Genotoxicity of pesticide mixtures present in the diet of the French population.  Environ Mol Mutagen. 2012;53(3):173-184. doi:10.1002/em.21676PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
IFOAM EU and FiBL. Organic in Europe: prospects and developments: 2016. https://shop.fibl.org/CHen/mwdownloads/download/link/id/767/?ref=1. Published 2016. Accessed September 3, 2017.
7.
Andreeva  VA, Salanave  B, Castetbon  K,  et al.  Comparison of the sociodemographic characteristics of the large NutriNet-Santé e-cohort with French Census data: the issue of volunteer bias revisited.  J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015;69(9):893-898. doi:10.1136/jech-2014-205263PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Andreeva  VA, Deschamps  V, Salanave  B,  et al.  Comparison of dietary intakes between a large online cohort study (Etude NutriNet-Santé) and a nationally representative cross-sectional study (Etude Nationale Nutrition Santé) in France: addressing the issue of generalizability in e-epidemiology.  Am J Epidemiol. 2016;184(9):660-669. doi:10.1093/aje/kww016PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Hughner  RS, McDonagh  P, Prothero  A, Shultz  CJ, Stanton  J.  Who are organic food consumers? a compilation and review of why people purchase organic food.  J Consum Behav. 2007;6(2-3):94-110. doi:10.1002/cb.210Google ScholarCrossref
10.
Padilla Bravo  C, Cordts  A, Schulze  B, Spiller  A.  Assessing determinants of organic food consumption using data from the German National Nutrition Survey II.  Food Qual Prefer. 2013;28(1):60-70. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.08.010Google ScholarCrossref
11.
Règlement (CE) No. 834/2007 Du Conseil. Du 28 Juin 2007: relatif à la production biologique et à l'étiquetage des produits biologiques et abrogeant le règlement (CEE) No. 2092/91. http://www.agencebio.org/sites/default/files/upload/documents/3_Espace_Pro/RCE_BIO_834_2007_oct08.pdf. Published 2007. Accessed July 18, 2016.
12.
Barański  M, Średnicka-Tober  D, Volakakis  N,  et al.  Higher antioxidant and lower cadmium concentrations and lower incidence of pesticide residues in organically grown crops: a systematic literature review and meta-analyses.  Br J Nutr. 2014;112(5):794-811. doi:10.1017/S0007114514001366PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
European Food Safety Authority.  Monitoring data on pesticide residues in food: results on organic versus conventionally produced food.  EFSA Support Publ. 2018;15(4):1397E. https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/supporting/pub/en-1397. Accessed April 26, 2018.Google Scholar
14.
Curl  CL, Beresford  SAA, Fenske  RA,  et al.  Estimating pesticide exposure from dietary intake and organic food choices: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA).  Environ Health Perspect. 2015;123(5):475-483. doi:10.1289/ehp.1408197PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Oates  L, Cohen  M, Braun  L, Schembri  A, Taskova  R.  Reduction in urinary organophosphate pesticide metabolites in adults after a week-long organic diet.  Environ Res. 2014;132:105-111. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2014.03.021PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
European Commission. EU: pesticides database. http://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/pesticides/eu-pesticides-database/public/. Published 2016. Accessed August 20, 2016.
17.
Kim  S, Thiessen  PA, Bolton  EE,  et al.  PubChem substance and compound databases.  Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(D1):D1202-D1213. doi:10.1093/nar/gkv951PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Bradbury  KE, Balkwill  A, Spencer  EA,  et al; Million Women Study Collaborators.  Organic food consumption and the incidence of cancer in a large prospective study of women in the United Kingdom.  Br J Cancer. 2014;110(9):2321-2326. doi:10.1038/bjc.2014.148PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Kesse-Guyot  E, Baudry  J, Assmann  KE, Galan  P, Hercberg  S, Lairon  D.  Prospective association between consumption frequency of organic food and body weight change, risk of overweight or obesity: results from the NutriNet-Santé study.  Br J Nutr. 2017;117(2):325-334. doi:10.1017/S0007114517000058PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Torjusen  H, Brantsæter  AL, Haugen  M,  et al.  Reduced risk of pre-eclampsia with organic vegetable consumption: results from the prospective Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study.  BMJ Open. 2014;4(9):e006143. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006143PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Eisinger-Watzl  M, Wittig  F, Heuer  T, Hoffmann  I.  Customers purchasing organic food: do they live healthier? results of the German National Nutrition Survey II.  Eur J Nutr Food Saf. 2015;5(1):59-71. doi:10.9734/EJNFS/2015/12734Google ScholarCrossref
22.
Baudry  J, Allès  B, Péneau  S,  et al.  Dietary intakes and diet quality according to levels of organic food consumption by French adults: cross-sectional findings from the NutriNet-Santé cohort study.  Public Health Nutr. 2017;20(4):638-648. doi:10.1017/S1368980016002718PubMedGoogle Scholar
23.
Petersen  SB, Rasmussen  MA, Strøm  M, Halldorsson  TI, Olsen  SF.  Sociodemographic characteristics and food habits of organic consumers: a study from the Danish National Birth Cohort.  Public Health Nutr. 2013;16(10):1810-1819. doi:10.1017/S1368980012004119PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Simões-Wüst  AP, Moltó-Puigmartí  C, van Dongen  MC, Dagnelie  PC, Thijs  C.  Organic food consumption during pregnancy is associated with different consumer profiles, food patterns and intake: the KOALA Birth Cohort Study.  Public Health Nutr. 2017;20(12):2134-2144. doi:10.1017/S1368980017000842PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Hercberg  S, Castetbon  K, Czernichow  S,  et al.  The NutriNet-Santé study: a web-based prospective study on the relationship between nutrition and health and determinants of dietary patterns and nutritional status.  BMC Public Health. 2010;10:242. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-242PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
World Medical Association.  World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.  JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191-2194. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.281053PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Touvier  M, Méjean  C, Kesse-Guyot  E,  et al.  Comparison between web-based and paper versions of a self-administered anthropometric questionnaire.  Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25(5):287-296. doi:10.1007/s10654-010-9433-9PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Vergnaud  AC, Touvier  M, Méjean  C,  et al.  Agreement between web-based and paper versions of a socio-demographic questionnaire in the NutriNet-Santé study.  Int J Public Health. 2011;56(4):407-417. doi:10.1007/s00038-011-0257-5PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Lassale  C, Péneau  S, Touvier  M,  et al.  Validity of web-based self-reported weight and height: results of the NutriNet-Santé study.  J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(8):e152. doi:10.2196/jmir.2575PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Lassale  C, Castetbon  K, Laporte  F,  et al.  Validation of a web-based, self-administered, non-consecutive-day dietary record tool against urinary biomarkers.  Br J Nutr. 2015;113(6):953-962. doi:10.1017/S0007114515000057PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
31.
Lassale  C, Castetbon  K, Laporte  F,  et al.  Correlations between fruit, vegetables, fish, vitamins, and fatty acids estimated by web-based nonconsecutive dietary records and respective biomarkers of nutritional status.  J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016;116(3):427-438.e5. doi:10.1016/j.jand.2015.09.017PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Touvier  M, Kesse-Guyot  E, Méjean  C,  et al.  Comparison between an interactive web-based self-administered 24 h dietary record and an interview by a dietitian for large-scale epidemiological studies.  Br J Nutr. 2011;105(7):1055-1064. doi:10.1017/S0007114510004617PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
33.
Le Moullec  N, Deheeger  M, Preziosi  P,  et al.  Validation of the photography manual of servings used in dietary collection in the SU.VI.MAX study  [in French].  Cah Nutr Diét. 1996;31(3):158-164.Google Scholar
34.
Monteiro  CA, Cannon  G, Moubarac  JC, Levy  RB, Louzada  MLC, Jaime  PC.  The UN Decade of Nutrition, the NOVA food classification and the trouble with ultra-processing.  Public Health Nutr. 2018;21(1):5-17. doi:10.1017/S1368980017000234PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
35.
Fiolet  T, Srour  B, Sellem  L,  et al.  Consumption of ultra-processed foods and cancer risk: results from NutriNet-Santé prospective cohort.  BMJ. 2018;360:k322. doi:10.1136/bmj.k322PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
36.
Étude NutriNet-Santé.  Table de Composition des Aliments. Paris, France: Economica; 2013.
37.
Black  AE.  Critical evaluation of energy intake using the Goldberg cut-off for energy intake:basal metabolic rate: a practical guide to its calculation, use and limitations.  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000;24(9):1119-1130. doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0801376PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
38.
Estaquio  C, Kesse-Guyot  E, Deschamps  V,  et al.  Adherence to the French Programme National Nutrition Santé Guideline Score is associated with better nutrient intake and nutritional status.  J Am Diet Assoc. 2009;109(6):1031-1041. doi:10.1016/j.jada.2009.03.012PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
39.
INSEE. Definitions, methods, and quality. http://www.insee.fr/en/methodes/. Published 2009. Accessed February 23, 2015.
40.
Hagströmer  M, Oja  P, Sjöström  M.  The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): a study of concurrent and construct validity.  Public Health Nutr. 2006;9(6):755-762. doi:10.1079/PHN2005898PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
41.
World Health Organization.  International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2010. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/icd/icd10cm.htm. Accessed August 30, 2018.
42.
Miettinen  OS.  Proportion of disease caused or prevented by a given exposure, trait or intervention.  Am J Epidemiol. 1974;99(5):325-332. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a121617PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
43.
Yusof  AS, Isa  ZM, Shah  SA.  Dietary patterns and risk of colorectal cancer: a systematic review of cohort studies (2000-2011).  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(9):4713-4717. doi:10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.9.4713PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
44.
Bertuccio  P, Rosato  V, Andreano  A,  et al.  Dietary patterns and gastric cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.  Ann Oncol. 2013;24(6):1450-1458. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdt108PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
45.
Brennan  SF, Cantwell  MM, Cardwell  CR, Velentzis  LS, Woodside  JV.  Dietary patterns and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.  Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;91(5):1294-1302. doi:10.3945/ajcn.2009.28796PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
46.
Barański  M, Srednicka-Tober  D, Volakakis  N,  et al.  Higher antioxidant and lower cadmium concentrations and lower incidence of pesticide residues in organically grown crops: a systematic literature review and meta-analyses.  Br J Nutr. 2014;112(5):794-811. doi:10.1017/S0007114514001366PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
47.
Smith-Spangler  C, Brandeau  ML, Olkin  I, Bravata  DM.  Are organic foods safer or healthier?  Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(4):297-300. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-158-4-201302190-00019PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
48.
Science and Technology Options Assessment. Human health implications of organic food and organic agriculture. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2016/581922/EPRS_STU%282016%29581922_EN.pdf. Accessed May 28, 2017.
49.
Guyton  KZ, Loomis  D, Grosse  Y,  et al; International Agency for Research on Cancer Monograph Working Group, IARC.  Carcinogenicity of tetrachlorvinphos, parathion, malathion, diazinon, and glyphosate.  Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(5):490-491. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70134-8PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
50.
Androutsopoulos  VP, Hernandez  AF, Liesivuori  J, Tsatsakis  AM.  A mechanistic overview of health associated effects of low levels of organochlorine and organophosphorous pesticides.  Toxicology. 2013;307:89-94. doi:10.1016/j.tox.2012.09.011PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
51.
Kim  KH, Kabir  E, Jahan  SA.  Exposure to pesticides and the associated human health effects.  Sci Total Environ. 2017;575:525-535. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.009PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
52.
Nougadère  A, Sirot  V, Kadar  A,  et al.  Total diet study on pesticide residues in France: levels in food as consumed and chronic dietary risk to consumers.  Environ Int. 2012;45:135-150. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2012.02.001PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
53.
Gray  JM, Rasanayagam  S, Engel  C, Rizzo  J.  State of the evidence 2017: an update on the connection between breast cancer and the environment.  Environ Health. 2017;16(1):94. doi:10.1186/s12940-017-0287-4PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
54.
Hu  L, Luo  D, Zhou  T, Tao  Y, Feng  J, Mei  S.  The association between non-Hodgkin lymphoma and organophosphate pesticides exposure: a meta-analysis.  Environ Pollut. 2017;231(pt 1):319-328. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2017.08.028PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
55.
Mostafalou  S, Abdollahi  M.  Pesticides and human chronic diseases: evidences, mechanisms, and perspectives.  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2013;268(2):157-177. doi:10.1016/j.taap.2013.01.025PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
56.
Macon  MB, Fenton  SE.  Endocrine disruptors and the breast: early life effects and later life disease.  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2013;18(1):43-61. doi:10.1007/s10911-013-9275-7PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
57.
Andreotti  G, Hou  L, Beane Freeman  LE,  et al.  Body mass index, agricultural pesticide use, and cancer incidence in the Agricultural Health Study cohort.  Cancer Causes Control. 2010;21(11):1759-1775. doi:10.1007/s10552-010-9603-9PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
If you are not a JN Learning subscriber, you can either:
Subscribe to JN Learning for one year
Buy this activity
jn-learning_Modal_LoginSubscribe_Purchase
Close
If you are not a JN Learning subscriber, you can either:
Subscribe to JN Learning for one year
Buy this activity
jn-learning_Modal_LoginSubscribe_Purchase
Close
With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Education Center Collection Sign In Modal Right
Close

Name Your Search

Save Search
Close
With a personal account, you can:
  • Track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
jn-learning_Modal_SaveSearch_NoAccess_Purchase
Close

Lookup An Activity

or

Close

My Saved Searches

You currently have no searches saved.

Close
With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Education Center Collection Sign In Modal Right
Close