[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]

Association Between Conventional Bicycle Helmet Use and Facial Injuries After Bicycle Crashes

Educational Objective
To review the conventional bicicle helmet's effectiveness in preventing facial trauma.
1 Credit CME
Key Points

Question  Do bicycle helmets provide sufficient protection to the face during bicycle crashes, and, if so, how much protection do they offer?

Findings  In this cohort study of 85 187 bicycle crashes from records in the US National Trauma Database, helmets were found to not sufficiently protect the face in bicycle crashes. Helmet protective capacity for the face lessens for the mid face and lower face.

Meaning  Bicyclists are at risk for experiencing facial fractures and soft-tissue injuries during crashes, particularly to the mid and lower face; public education regarding potential facial injury despite helmet use may be warranted.

Abstract

Importance  Bicycling is an increasingly common activity in the United States that is often associated with fall injuries to the head and face. Although helmets lessen head injury, their role in reducing facial injuries is less clear; therefore, it is important to understand the protective capacity for the face in current helmet design.

Objective  To estimate the conventional bicycle helmet’s association with the rate of facial injury after bicycle crashes.

Design, Setting, and Participants  This retrospective cohort study accessed records from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2014, from the National Trauma Databank, which collects data from emergency departments in US hospitals. Each record pertained to 1 emergency department admission for a bicycle crash. The National Trauma Databank registry data are collected and recorded by incident, which is equivalent to an injury-related hospital admission. All injuries involving patients aged 18 to 65 years for whom data on helmet use and injury were available were included. Statistical analysis was conducted from July 19 to October 17, 2016.

Exposures  Helmeted and nonhelmeted bicycle crashes.

Main Outcomes and Measures  Head and facial injuries among helmeted and nonhelmeted bicycle crashes.

Results  A total of 85 187 facial injuries met inclusion criteria (patient age 18-65 years, availability of helmet use status, and type of injury). Demographic information on bicycle riders was frequently unavailable. Among all injuries, fractures to the head (11.6% [9854]) and face (11.3% [9589]) occurred at similar rates. Helmets reduced head fractures by 52% (from 14.0% [7623] to 7.3% [2231]) and head soft-tissue injuries by 30% (from 15.0% [8151] to 10.9% [3358]), but had lower rates in protecting against facial injuries. While reducing facial injuries overall, the amount of protection with helmet use varied with facial location of the injury. Reduction in facial fractures was 35% (95% CI, 31%-39%) for upper face, 28% (95% CI, 23%-32%) for mid face, and 21% (95% CI, 15%-26%) for the lower face. Helmets were less protective against facial soft-tissue injuries, with a reduction of 33% (95% CI, 30%-36%) in the upper face, 21% (95% CI, 16%-26%) in the mid face, and 2% (95% CI, 0%-6%) in the lower face.

Conclusions and Relevance  Although bicycle helmets provide some protection against facial injuries after bicycle crashes, the level of protection depends on the proximity of the injury to the helmeted head. The lower face is particularly vulnerable to injury despite helmet use.

Sign in to take quiz and track your certificates

Buy This Activity

JN Learning™ is the home for CME and MOC from the JAMA Network. Search by specialty or US state and earn AMA PRA Category 1 CME Credit™ from articles, audio, Clinical Challenges and more. Learn more about CME/MOC

Article Information

Accepted for Publication: October 2, 2018.

Corresponding Author: Rahul Seth, MD, Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, 2233 Post Street, Third Floor, San Francisco, CA 94115 (rahul.seth@ucsf.edu).

Published Online: December 13, 2018. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2018.3351

Author Contributions: Ms Benjamin and Dr Seth had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Concept and design: Knott, Seth.

Study concept and design: Benjamin.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.

Drafting of the manuscript: Benjamin, Hills, Seth.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.

Statistical analysis: Benjamin, Hills, Seth.

Obtained funding: Seth.

Administrative, technical, or material support: Knott, Murr, Seth.

Supervision: Benjamin, Knott, Seth.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Funding/Support: Funding for this project was provided through a monetary gift from a trauma patient and the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery. This project was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, through UCSF-Clinical and Translational Science Institute (CTSI) grant UL1 TR000004.

Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funding sources had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Disclaimer: Contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Meeting Presentation: The study was presented at the Triological Society; April 29, 2017; San Diego, California.

Additional Contributions: Jennifer Creasman, MSPH (UCSF CTSI), assisted with data extraction. Compensation was received.

References
1.
Traffic Safety Facts: 2014 Data. Bicyclists and other cyclists: report No. DOT HS 812 282. US Department of Transportation: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration website. https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/812282. Published May 2016. Accessed April 1, 2016.
2.
The League of American Bicyclists. Bicycle commuting data. http://www.bikeleague.org/commutingdata. Accessed April 1, 2016.
3.
National Safety Council. Estimating the cost of unintentional injuries. http://www.nsc.org/learn/safety-knowledge/Pages/injury-facts-estimating-cost-of-unintentional-injuries.aspx. Updated 2018. Accessed April 15, 2016.
4.
The Outdoor Foundation. Outdoor participation report: 2013. https://outdoorindustry.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/2013-Outdoor-ResearchParticipation1.pdf. Accessed November 5, 2018.
5.
Dinh  MM, Kastelein  C, Hopkins  R,  et al.  Mechanisms, injuries and helmet use in cyclists presenting to an inner city emergency department.  Emerg Med Australas. 2015;27(4):323-327. doi:10.1111/1742-6723.12407PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Mayersak  RJ. Initial evaluation and management of facial trauma in adults. UpToDate website. http://www.uptodate.com/contents/facial-trauma-in-adults?source=machineLearning. Updated November 7, 2016. Accessed April 1, 2016.
7.
Richter  M, Otte  D, Lehmann  U,  et al.  Head injury mechanisms in helmet-protected motorcyclists: prospective multicenter study.  J Trauma. 2001;51(5):949-958. doi:10.1097/00005373-200111000-00021PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Joseph  B, Azim  A, Haider  AA,  et al.  Bicycle helmets work when it matters the most.  Am J Surg. 2017;213(2):413-417. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.05.021PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Stier  R, Otte  D, Müller  C,  et al.  Effectiveness of bicycle safety helmets in preventing facial injuries in road accidents.  Arch Trauma Res. 2016;5(3):e30011. doi:10.5812/atr.30011PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Thompson  DC, Rivara  FP, Thompson  R.  Helmets for preventing head and facial injuries in bicyclists.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2(2):CD001855.PubMedGoogle Scholar
11.
Thompson  DC, Nunn  ME, Thompson  RS, Rivara  FP.  Effectiveness of bicycle safety helmets in preventing serious facial injury.  JAMA. 1996;276(24):1974-1975. doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03540240052030PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Prashanth  NT, Raghuveer  HP, Kumar  D, Shobha  ES, Rangan  V, Rao  TS.  Anxiety and depression in facial injuries: a comparative study.  J Int Oral Health. 2015;7(9):94-100. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1777PubMedGoogle Scholar
13.
Pena  I  Jr, Roberts  LE, Guy  WM, Zevallos  JP.  The cost and inpatient burden of treating mandible fractures: a nationwide inpatient sample database analysis.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;151(4):591-598. doi:10.1177/0194599814542590PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Herlihy  DV.  Bicycle: The History. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 2004:368.
15.
Cornell Law School. Legal Information Institute. 16 CFR 1203.1—scope, general requirements, and effective date. https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/16/1203.1. Accessed November 8, 2018.
If you are not a JN Learning subscriber, you can either:
Subscribe to JN Learning for one year
Buy this activity
jn-learning_Modal_LoginSubscribe_Purchase
If you are not a JN Learning subscriber, you can either:
Subscribe to JN Learning for one year
Buy this activity
jn-learning_Modal_LoginSubscribe_Purchase
With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Education Center Collection Sign In Modal Right

Name Your Search

Save Search
With a personal account, you can:
  • Track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
jn-learning_Modal_SaveSearch_NoAccess_Purchase

Lookup An Activity

or

My Saved Searches

You currently have no searches saved.

With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Education Center Collection Sign In Modal Right
Topics
State Requirements