Potential Consequences of Patient Complications for Surgeon Well-being | Occupational Health | JN Learning | AMA Ed Hub [Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]

Potential Consequences of Patient Complications for Surgeon Well-beingA Systematic Review

Educational Objective To recognize to what extent patient complications affect surgeon health outcomes.
1 Credit CME
Key Points

Question  What role do patient complications play in surgeon well-being?

Findings  This systematic review of 9 studies (10 702 unique participants) demonstrated that the occurrence of patient complications adversely affected surgeons’ psychological well-being and their professional and personal lives.

Meaning  Results of this study suggest that patient complications adversely affect surgeons’ health, and departments, institutions, and professional organizations must acknowledge this and develop strategies to educate and support surgeons in managing this part of their professional lives.


Importance  Patient complications occur in all areas of surgery, and managing them is an important part of surgical practice. Several investigations have examined whether surgeon health affects patient outcomes; however, to date, whether adverse patient outcomes affect surgeon well-being has not been comprehensively examined.

Objective  To examine how surgical complications in their patients affect the health of surgeons, in particular emotional outcomes, coping strategies, and support mechanisms.

Evidence Review  A systematic literature review was conducted to identify studies evaluating how patient complications affect surgeons with the aim of determining emotional outcomes, coping strategies, and support mechanisms. Studies pertaining to burnout alone or not conducted in surgeons were excluded. The databases searched included MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, with all literature available on these data sets until the search date of May 1, 2018; collected data were analyzed between May 2 and June 1, 2018. The reference lists of all included studies, as well as related review articles, were manually searched to identify further relevant studies. An inductive approach was used to identify common themes.

Findings  Nine case series or cross-sectional studies from the United Kingdom or North America were found (8518 unique participants), with 1 study in surgical trainees. Across all studies, surgeons were affected emotionally after complications, with adverse consequences in their professional and personal lives. Four themes were identified within the literature: the adverse emotional influence of complications (anxiety, guilt, sadness, shame, interference with professional and leisure activities) after intraoperative adverse events; coping mechanisms used by surgeons and trainees (limited discussion with colleagues, exercise, artistic or creative outlets, alcohol and substance abuse); institutional support mechanisms and barriers to support (clinical conferences, discussion with mentors, a perception that emotional distress would be perceived as a constitutional weakness); and the consequences of complications in future clinical practice (changes in practice, introduction of protocols, education of staff members, and participating in root-cause analysis).

Conclusions and Relevance  This study’s findings suggest that complications affect surgeons adversely across multiple domains. Further efforts are required at a personal, departmental, institutional, and organizational level to provide effective support. This review highlights that the psychological consequences of patient complications seem to be an important occupational health issue for surgeons.

Sign in to take quiz and track your certificates

Buy This Activity

JN Learning™ is the home for CME and MOC from the JAMA Network. Search by specialty or US state and earn AMA PRA Category 1 CME Credit™ from articles, audio, Clinical Challenges and more. Learn more about CME/MOC

Article Information

Accepted for Publication: September 14, 2018.

Corresponding Author: Jonathan Koea, MD, FRACS, Upper Gastrointestinal Unit, Department of Surgery, North Shore Hospital, Private Bag 93503, Takapuna, Auckland 0620, New Zealand (jonathan.koea@waitematadhb.govt.nz).

Published Online: March 27, 2019. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2018.5640

Author Contributions: Dr Koea had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Concept and design: All authors.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Srinivasa, Koea.

Drafting of the manuscript: Srinivasa, Gurney.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Gurney, Koea.

Statistical analysis: Koea.

Administrative, technical, or material support: Srinivasa, Koea.

Supervision: Koea.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Additional Information: Figure 2 is an original illustration that was commissioned for this article and created by New Zealand–based illustrator Mark O’Brien (http://www.monsta.co.nz/).

Harms  BA, Heise  CP, Gould  JC, Starling  JR  Jr.  A 25-year single institution analysis of health, practice, and fate of general surgeons.  Ann Surg. 2005;242(4):520-526.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Shanafelt  TD, Oreskovich  MR, Dyrbye  LN,  et al.  Avoiding burnout: the personal health habits and wellness practices of US surgeons.  Ann Surg. 2012;255(4):625-633. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824b2fa0PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Balch  CM, Shanafelt  T.  Combating stress and burnout in surgical practice: a review.  Adv Surg. 2010;44:29-47. doi:10.1016/j.yasu.2010.05.018PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Balch  CM, Shanafelt  TD, Dyrbye  L,  et al.  Surgeon distress as calibrated by hours worked and nights on call.  J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211(5):609-619. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.06.393PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Chaput  B, Bertheuil  N, Jacques  J,  et al.  Professional burnout among plastic surgery residents: can it be prevented? outcomes of a national survey.  Ann Plast Surg. 2015;75(1):2-8. doi:10.1097/SAP.0000000000000530PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Shanafelt  TD, Balch  CM, Bechamps  G,  et al.  Burnout and medical errors among American surgeons.  Ann Surg. 2010;251(6):995-1000. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bfdab3PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Luu  S, Leung  SO, Moulton  CA.  When bad things happen to good surgeons: reactions to adverse events.  Surg Clin North Am. 2012;92(1):153-161. doi:10.1016/j.suc.2011.12.002PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Marmon  LM, Heiss  K.  Improving surgeon wellness: the second victim syndrome and quality of care.  Semin Pediatr Surg. 2015;24(6):315-318. doi:10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2015.08.011PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Pellino  IM, Pellino  G.  Consequences of defensive medicine, second victims, and clinical-judicial syndrome on surgeons’ medical practice and on health service.  Updates Surg. 2015;67(4):331-337. doi:10.1007/s13304-015-0338-8PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Luu  S, Patel  P, St-Martin  L,  et al.  Waking up the next morning: surgeons’ emotional reactions to adverse events.  Med Educ. 2012;46(12):1179-1188. doi:10.1111/medu.12058PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Pinto  A, Faiz  O, Bicknell  C, Vincent  C.  Surgical complications and their implications for surgeons’ well-being.  Br J Surg. 2013;100(13):1748-1755. doi:10.1002/bjs.9308PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Pinto  A, Faiz  O, Bicknell  C, Vincent  C.  Acute traumatic stress among surgeons after major surgical complications.  Am J Surg. 2014;208(4):642-647. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.06.018PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Seys  D, Wu  AW, Van Gerven  E,  et al.  Health care professionals as second victims after adverse events: a systematic review.  Eval Health Prof. 2013;36(2):135-162. doi:10.1177/0163278712458918PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Wu  AW.  Medical error: the second victim: the doctor who makes the mistake needs help too.  BMJ. 2000;320(7237):726-727. doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7237.726PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Stiegler  MP.  A piece of my mind: what I learned about adverse events from Captain Sully: it’s not what you think.  JAMA. 2015;313(4):361-362. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.16025PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Orri  M, Farges  O, Clavien  PA, Barkun  J, Revah-Lévy  A.  Being a surgeon—the myth and the reality: a meta-synthesis of surgeons’ perspectives about factors affecting their practice and well-being.  Ann Surg. 2014;260(5):721-728. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000000962PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Moher  D, Liberati  A, Tetzlaff  J, Altman  DG; PRISMA Group.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.  PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Balogun  JA, Bramall  AN, Bernstein  M.  How surgical trainees handle catastrophic errors: a qualitative study.  J Surg Educ. 2015;72(6):1179-1184. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.05.003PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Han  K, Bohnen  JD, Peponis  T,  et al.  The surgeon as the second victim? results of the Boston Intraoperative Adverse Events Surgeons’ Attitude (BISA) Study.  J Am Coll Surg. 2017;224(6):1048-1056. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.12.039PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Lander  LI, Connor  JA, Shah  RK, Kentala  E, Healy  GB, Roberson  DW.  Otolaryngologists’ responses to errors and adverse events.  Laryngoscope. 2006;116(7):1114-1120. doi:10.1097/01.mlg.0000224493.81115.57PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Patel  AM, Ingalls  NK, Mansour  MA, Sherman  S, Davis  AT, Chung  MH.  Collateral damage: the effect of patient complications on the surgeon’s psyche.  Surgery. 2010;148(4):824-828. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2010.07.024PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Smith  IC, Jones  MW.  Surgeons’ attitudes to intraoperative death: questionnaire survey.  BMJ. 2001;322(7291):896-897. doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7291.896PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Center for Evidence-Based Medicine. OCEBM levels of evidence. https://www.cebm.net/2016/05/ocebm-levels-of-evidence/. May 1, 2016. Accessed May 10, 2018.
Vaillant  GE, Sobowale  NC, McArthur  C.  Some psychologic vulnerabilities of physicians.  N Engl J Med. 1972;287(8):372-375. doi:10.1056/NEJM197208242870802PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Royal Australasian College of Surgeons. Let’s operate with respect. https://www.surgeons.org/news/let%27s-operate-with-respect/ Accessed May 10, 2018.
Shanafelt  T, Dyrbye  L.  Oncologist burnout: causes, consequences, and responses.  J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(11):1235-1241. doi:10.1200/JCO.2011.39.7380PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
de Jong  MA, Nieuwenhuijsen  K, Sluiter  JK.  Common mental disorders related to incidents and behaviour in physicians.  Occup Med (Lond). 2016;66(7):506-513. doi:10.1093/occmed/kqw030PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Panagioti  M, Panagopoulou  E, Bower  P,  et al.  Controlled interventions to reduce burnout in physicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis.  JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(2):195-205. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7674PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Shanafelt  TD, Balch  CM, Dyrbye  L,  et al.  Special report: suicidal ideation among American surgeons.  Arch Surg. 2011;146(1):54-62. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2010.292PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
If you are not a JN Learning subscriber, you can either:
Subscribe to JN Learning for one year
Buy this activity
If you are not a JN Learning subscriber, you can either:
Subscribe to JN Learning for one year
Buy this activity
With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Education Center Collection Sign In Modal Right

Name Your Search

Save Search
With a personal account, you can:
  • Track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience

Lookup An Activity



My Saved Searches

You currently have no searches saved.

With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Education Center Collection Sign In Modal Right