[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]

Effect of an Incentive Spirometer Patient Reminder After Coronary Artery Bypass GraftingA Randomized Clinical Trial

Educational Objective To identify to what extent patient reminders to perform incentive spirometer (IS) improve outcomes after cardiac surgery.
Key Points

Question  What is the effect of a use-tracking incentive spirometer (IS) reminder on patient adherence and clinical outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting surgery?

Findings  In this randomized clinical trial that included 160 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, the patient reminder improved IS use adherence, atelectasis severity, early postoperative fevers, noninvasive positive pressure ventilation use, intensive care unit length of stay by a day, and 6-month mortality rates.

Meaning  With the reminder, IS appears to be clinically effective when used appropriately.

Abstract

Importance  Incentive spirometers (ISs) were developed to reduce atelectasis and are in widespread clinical use. However, without IS use adherence data, the effectiveness of IS cannot be determined.

Objective  To evaluate the effect of a use-tracking IS reminder on patient adherence and clinical outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery.

Design, Setting, and Participants  This randomized clinical trial was conducted from June 5, 2017, to December 29, 2017, at a tertiary referral teaching hospital and included 212 patients who underwent CABG, of whom 160 participants were randomized (intent to treat), with 145 completing the study per protocol. Participants were stratified by surgical urgency (elective vs nonelective) and sex (men vs women).

Interventions  A use-tracking, IS add-on device (SpiroTimer) with an integrated use reminder bell recorded and timestamped participants’ inspiratory breaths. Patients were randomized by hourly reminder “bell on” (experimental group) or “bell off” (control group).

Main Outcomes and Measures  Incentive spirometer use was recorded for the entire postoperative stay and compared between groups. Radiographic atelectasis severity (score, 0-10) was the primary clinical outcome. Secondary respiratory and nonrespiratory outcomes were also evaluated.

Results  A total of 145 per-protocol participants (112 men [77%]; mean age, 69 years [95% CI, 67-70]; 90 [62%] undergoing a nonelective procedure) were evaluated, with 74 (51.0%) in the bell off group and 71 (49.0%) in the bell on group. The baseline medical and motivation-to-recover characteristics of the 2 groups were similar. The mean number of daily inspiratory breaths was greater in bell on (35; 95% CI, 29-43 vs 17; 95% CI, 13-23; P < .001). The percentage of recorded hours with an inspiratory breath event was greater in bell on (58%; 95% CI, 51-65 vs 28%; 95% CI, 23-32; P < .001). Despite no differences in the first postoperative chest radiograph mean atelectasis severity scores (2.3; 95% CI, 2.0-2.6 vs 2.4; 95% CI, 2.2-2.7; P = .48), the mean atelectasis severity scores for the final chest radiographs conducted before discharge were significantly lower for bell on than bell off group (1.5; 95% CI, 1.3-1.8 vs 1.8; 95% CI, 1.6-2.1; P = .04). Of those with early postoperative fevers, fever duration was shorter for bell on (3.2 hours; 95% CI, 2.3-4.6 vs 5.2 hours; 95% CI, 3.9-7.0; P = .04). Having the bell turned on reduced noninvasive positive pressure ventilation use rates (37.2%; 95% CI, 24.1%-52.5% vs 19.2%; 95% CI, 10.2%-33.0%; P = .03) for participants undergoing nonelective procedures. Bell on reduced the median postoperative length of stay (7 days; 95% CI, 6-9 vs 6 days; 95% CI, 6-7; P = .048) and the intensive care unit length of stay for patients undergoing nonelective procedures (4 days; 95% CI, 3-5 vs 3 days; 95% CI, 3-4; P = .02). At 6 months, the bell off mortality rate was higher than bell on (9% vs 0%, P = .048) for participants undergoing nonelective procedures.

Conclusions and Relevance  The incentive spirometer reminder improved patient adherence, atelectasis severity, early postoperative fever duration, noninvasive positive pressure ventilation use, ICU and length of stay, and 6-month mortality in certain patients. With the reminder, IS appears to be clinically effective when used appropriately.

Trial Registration  ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02952027

Sign in to take quiz and track your certificates

Buy This Activity

JN Learning™ is the home for CME and MOC from the JAMA Network. Search by specialty or US state and earn AMA PRA Category 1 CME Credit™ from articles, audio, Clinical Challenges and more. Learn more about CME/MOC

Article Information

Accepted for Publication: February 10, 2019.

Corresponding Author: Adam E. M. Eltorai, PhD, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, 222 Richmond St, Providence, RI 02903 (adam_eltorai@brown.edu).

Published Online: April 10, 2019. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0520

Author Contributions: Drs A. E. M. Eltorai and Baird had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Concept and design: A. E. M. Eltorai, Baird, A. S. Eltorai, Agarwal, Ventetuolo, Connors, Sellke, Elias, Daniels.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: A. E. M. Eltorai, Baird, Healey, Agarwal, Martin, Chen, Kazemi, Keable, Diaz Santos, Pangborn, Fox, Sellke, Daniels.

Drafting of the manuscript: A. E. M. Eltorai, Baird, Keable, Elias, Daniels.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: A. E. M. Eltorai, Baird, A. S. Eltorai, Healey, Agarwal, Ventetuolo, Martin, Chen, Kazemi, Diaz Santos, Pangborn, Fox, Connors, Sellke, Elias, Daniels.

Statistical analysis: A. E. Eltorai, Baird.

Obtained funding: Daniels.

Administrative, technical, or material support: A. E. M. Eltorai, A. S. Eltorai, Healey, Martin, Kazemi, Diaz Santos, Pangborn, Connors, Sellke, Elias, Daniels.

Supervision: A. E. M. Eltorai, Healey, Agarwal, Connors, Sellke, Elias, Daniels.

Other - Obtained data: Keable.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr A. E. M. Eltorai receives book editor royalties from Springer and Lippincott; owns equity in Quitbit, Inc; and is listed as an inventor on the patent application “Patient Reminder System and Method for Incentive Spirometer Utilization” (US Application US20180000379A1), from which he has received no money or financial benefit from the patent application. Dr Daniels is a consultant for DePuy, Globus Medical, Orthofix, and Stryker and he received book editor royalties from Springer. Dr Sellke reports receiving consulting fees from Stryker and Boehringer Ingelheim. No other disclosures were reported.

Data Sharing Statement: See Supplement 3.

Additional Contributions: We thank the following uncompensated individuals for their help with data collection: Steven E. Reinert, MS, Lifespan Information Services; Kimberly J. Smeals, RRT, and Jaqueline Barbaria, RRT, Rhode Island Hospital Respiratory Therapy; Ankush Bajaj, BA, Brown University; Laura Norton, RN, Lifespan; Jeffrey Karg, MS, Boston Innovation; Renee David, MS, RNP, Rhode Island Hospital Cardiac Surgery; and Paula Gellner, MSN, and Samantha Moylan, BSN, RN, Rhode Island Hospital.

References
1.
Xue  FS, Li  BW, Zhang  GS,  et al.  The influence of surgical sites on early postoperative hypoxemia in adults undergoing elective surgery.  Anesth Analg. 1999;88(1):213-219.PubMedGoogle Scholar
2.
Carter  AR, Sostman  HD, Curtis  AM, Swett  HA.  Thoracic alterations after cardiac surgery.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1983;140(3):475-481. doi:10.2214/ajr.140.3.475PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Doherty  G. Postoperative complications. In: Doherty  G, ed.  Current Diagnosis & Treatment: Surgery. 13th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2010:35-45.
4.
Fernandez-Bustamante  A, Frendl  G, Sprung  J,  et al.  Postoperative pulmonary complications, early mortality, and hospital stay following noncardiothoracic surgery: a multicenter study by the Perioperative Research Network Investigators.  JAMA Surg. 2017;152(2):157-166. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4065PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Bartlett  RH, Krop  P, Hanson  EL, Moore  FD.  Physiology of yawning and its application to postoperative care.  Surg Forum. 1970;21:222-224.PubMedGoogle Scholar
6.
Eltorai  AEM, Baird  GL, Pangborn  J,  et al.  Financial impact of incentive spirometry.  Inquiry. 2018;55:46958018794993.PubMedGoogle Scholar
7.
Freitas  ER, Soares  BG, Cardoso  JR, Atallah  AN.  Incentive spirometry for preventing pulmonary complications after coronary artery bypass graft.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(9):CD004466.PubMedGoogle Scholar
8.
Narayanan  AL, Hamid  SR, Supriyanto  E.  Evidence regarding patient compliance with incentive spirometry interventions after cardiac, thoracic and abdominal surgeries: a systematic literature review.  Can J Respir Ther. 2016;52(1):17-26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
9.
Eltorai  AEM, Baird  GL, Eltorai  AS,  et al.  Incentive spirometry adherence: a national survey of provider perspectives.  Respir Care. 2018;63(5):532-537. doi:10.4187/respcare.05882PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Fenerty  SD, West  C, Davis  SA, Kaplan  SG, Feldman  SR.  The effect of reminder systems on patients’ adherence to treatment.  Patient Prefer Adherence. 2012;6:127-135.PubMedGoogle Scholar
11.
Chung  DA, Sharples  LD, Nashef  SA.  A case-control analysis of readmissions to the cardiac surgical intensive care unit.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002;22(2):282-286. doi:10.1016/S1010-7940(02)00303-2PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Sung  JC, Nichol  MB, Venturini  F, Bailey  KL, McCombs  JS, Cody  M.  Factors affecting patient compliance with antihyperlipidemic medications in an HMO population.  Am J Manag Care. 1998;4(10):1421-1430.PubMedGoogle Scholar
13.
Vaccarino  V, Lin  ZQ, Kasl  SV,  et al.  Sex differences in health status after coronary artery bypass surgery.  Circulation. 2003;108(21):2642-2647. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000097117.28614.D8PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Stamou  SC, Hill  PC, Haile  E, Prince  S, Mack  MJ, Corso  PJ.  Clinical outcomes of nonelective coronary revascularization with and without cardiopulmonary bypass.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;131(1):28-33. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.08.059PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Sobolev  BG, Fradet  G, Hayden  R, Kuramoto  L, Levy  AR, FitzGerald  MJ.  Delay in admission for elective coronary-artery bypass grafting is associated with increased in-hospital mortality.  BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:185. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-8-185PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Bandura  A.  Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency.  Am Psychol. 1982;37(2):122-147. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122Google ScholarCrossref
17.
Weiner  B.  Attribution theory, achievement motivation, and the educational process.  Rev Educ Res. 1972;42(2):203-215. doi:10.3102/00346543042002203Google ScholarCrossref
18.
Hong  Y, Chiu  C, Dweck  CS, Lin  DMS, Wan  W.  Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: a meaning system approach.  J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999;77:588-599. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.588Google ScholarCrossref
19.
Rotter  JB.  Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.  Psychol Monogr. 1966;80(1):1-28. doi:10.1037/h0092976PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Eltorai  AEM, Baird  GL, Eltorai  AS,  et al.  Perspectives on incentive spirometry utility and patient protocols.  Respir Care. 2018;63(5):519-531. doi:10.4187/respcare.05872PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Wilkins  R. Lung expansion therapy. In: Wikins  RLSJ, Kacmarek  RM, eds.  Egan’s Fundamentals of Respiratory Care. 9th ed. St Louis: Mosby Elsevier; 2009:903-920.
22.
Jensen  L, Yang  L.  Risk factors for postoperative pulmonary complications in coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients.  Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2007;6(3):241-246. doi:10.1016/J.EJCNURSE.2006.11.001PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
Staehr  AK, Meyhoff  CS, Henneberg  SW, Christensen  PL, Rasmussen  LS.  Influence of perioperative oxygen fraction on pulmonary function after abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial.  BMC Res Notes. 2012;5:383. doi:10.1186/1756-0500-5-383PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Joyce  CJ, Baker  AB, Chartres  S.  Influence of inspired nitrogen concentration during anaesthesia for coronary artery bypass grafting on postoperative atelectasis.  Br J Anaesth. 1995;75(4):422-427. doi:10.1093/bja/75.4.422PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Wilcox  P, Baile  EM, Hards  J,  et al.  Phrenic nerve function and its relationship to atelectasis after coronary artery bypass surgery.  Chest. 1988;93(4):693-698. doi:10.1378/chest.93.4.693PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Mavros  MN, Velmahos  GC, Falagas  ME.  Atelectasis as a cause of postoperative fever: where is the clinical evidence?  Chest. 2011;140(2):418-424. doi:10.1378/chest.11-0127PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Skinner  BF.  About Behaviorism. New York, NY: Vintage; 1976.
28.
Browne  DR, Rochford  J, O’Connell  U, Jones  JG.  The incidence of postoperative atelectasis in the dependent lung following thoracotomy: the value of added nitrogen.  Br J Anaesth. 1970;42(4):340-346. doi:10.1093/bja/42.4.340PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Rothen  HU, Sporre  B, Engberg  G, Wegenius  G, Reber  A, Hedenstierna  G.  Prevention of atelectasis during general anaesthesia.  Lancet. 1995;345(8962):1387-1391. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(95)92595-3PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Bendixen  HH, Hedley-Whyte  J, Laver  MB.  Impaired oxygenation in surgical patients during general anesthesia with controlled ventilation: a concept of atelectasis.  N Engl J Med. 1963;269:991-996. doi:10.1056/NEJM196311072691901PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
31.
Froese  AB, Bryan  AC.  Effects of anesthesia and paralysis on diaphragmatic mechanics in man.  Anesthesiology. 1974;41(3):242-255. doi:10.1097/00000542-197409000-00006PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Marshall  BE.  Importance of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction with atelectasis.  Adv Shock Res. 1982;8:1-12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
33.
Muscedere  JG, Mullen  JB, Gan  K, Slutsky  AS.  Tidal ventilation at low airway pressures can augment lung injury.  Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994;149(5):1327-1334. doi:10.1164/ajrccm.149.5.8173774PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
34.
Chiumello  D, Pristine  G, Slutsky  AS.  Mechanical ventilation affects local and systemic cytokines in an animal model of acute respiratory distress syndrome.  Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;160(1):109-116. doi:10.1164/ajrccm.160.1.9803046PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
35.
Tyson  AF, Kendig  CE, Mabedi  C, Cairns  BA, Charles  AG.  The effect of incentive spirometry on postoperative pulmonary function following laparotomy: a randomized clinical trial.  JAMA Surg. 2015;150(3):229-236. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2014.1846PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
36.
Shorr  AF.  An update on cost-effectiveness analysis in critical care.  Curr Opin Crit Care. 2002;8(4):337-343. doi:10.1097/00075198-200208000-00011PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
37.
Halpern  NA, Pastores  SM.  Critical care medicine in the United States 2000-2005: an analysis of bed numbers, occupancy rates, payer mix, and costs.  Crit Care Med. 2010;38(1):65-71. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b090d0PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
38.
Dasta  JF, McLaughlin  TP, Mody  SH, Piech  CT.  Daily cost of an intensive care unit day: the contribution of mechanical ventilation.  Crit Care Med. 2005;33(6):1266-1271. doi:10.1097/01.CCM.0000164543.14619.00PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
If you are not a JN Learning subscriber, you can either:
Subscribe to JN Learning for one year
Buy this activity
jn-learning_Modal_LoginSubscribe_Purchase
If you are not a JN Learning subscriber, you can either:
Subscribe to JN Learning for one year
Buy this activity
jn-learning_Modal_LoginSubscribe_Purchase
With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Education Center Collection Sign In Modal Right

Name Your Search

Save Search
With a personal account, you can:
  • Track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
jn-learning_Modal_SaveSearch_NoAccess_Purchase

Lookup An Activity

or

My Saved Searches

You currently have no searches saved.

With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Education Center Collection Sign In Modal Right
Topics
State Requirements