Assessment of Voice Outcomes Following Surgery for Thyroid Cancer | Endocrinology | JN Learning | AMA Ed Hub [Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]

Assessment of Voice Outcomes Following Surgery for Thyroid Cancer

Educational Objective
To describe the prevalence, severity, and characteristics of voice-related complaints following thyroid surgery for differentiated thyroid cancer.
1 Credit CME
Key Points

Question  What is the association between thyroid cancer surgery and postoperative voice outcomes?

Findings  In this population-based study of 2325 patients aged 17 to 89 years diagnosed as having differentiated thyroid cancer, abnormal voice was noted in 272 patients following surgery for thyroid cancer.

Meaning  These findings suggest a need for heightened awareness of voice abnormalities following surgery and warrant consideration in the preoperative risk-benefit discussion, planned extent of surgery, and postoperative rehabilitation.

Abstract

Importance  An increasing number of surgeries are being performed for differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). Long-term voice abnormalities are a known risk of thyroid surgery; however, few studies have used validated scales to quantify voice outcomes after surgery.

Objective  To identify the prevalence, severity, and factors associated with poor voice outcomes following surgery for DTC.

Design, Setting, and Participants  A cross-sectional, population-based survey was distributed via a modified Dillman method to 4185 eligible patients and linked to Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) data from SEER sites in Georgia and Los Angeles, California, from February 1, 2017, to October 31, 2018. Multivariable logistic regression and zero-inflated negative binomial analysis were performed to determine factors associated with abnormal voice. Participants included patients undergoing surgery for DTC between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2015, excluding those with voice abnormalities before surgery.

Main Outcomes and Measures  Abnormal Voice Handicap Index (VHI-10) score, defined as greater than 11. The VHI-10 is designed to quantify 10 psychosocial consequences of voice disorders on a Likert scale (0, never; to 4, always).

Results  A total of 2632 patients (63%) responded to the survey and 2325 met the inclusion criteria. With data reported as unweighted number and weighted percentage, 1792 were women (77.4%); weighted mean (SD) age was 49.4 (14.4) years. Of these, 599 patients (25.8%) reported voice changes lasting more than 3 months following surgery, 272 patients (12.7%) were identified as having an abnormal VHI-10 score, and 105 patients (4.7%) reported vocal fold motion impairment diagnosed by laryngoscopy. In multivariable analysis, factors associated with an abnormal VHI-10 score included age 45 to 54 years (reference, ≤44 years; odds ratio [OR], 1.49; 95% CI, 1.05-2.11), black race (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.14-2.62), Asian race (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.08-2.54), gastroesophageal reflux disease (OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.15-2.43), and lateral neck dissection (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.11-3.56).

Conclusions and Relevance  A high prevalence of abnormal voice per validation with the VHI-10 emphasizes the need for heightened awareness of voice abnormalities following surgery and warrants consideration in the preoperative risk-benefit discussion, planned extent of surgery, and postoperative rehabilitation.

Sign in to take quiz and track your certificates

Buy This Activity

JN Learning™ is the home for CME and MOC from the JAMA Network. Search by specialty or US state and earn AMA PRA Category 1 CME Credit™ from articles, audio, Clinical Challenges and more. Learn more about CME/MOC

CME Disclosure Statement: Unless noted, all individuals in control of content reported no relevant financial relationships. If applicable, all relevant financial relationships have been mitigated.

Article Information

Accepted for Publication: May 20, 2019.

Corresponding Author: Megan R. Haymart, MD, Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology, and Diabetes, University of Michigan, North Campus Research Complex, 2800 Plymouth Rd, Bldg 16, Room 408E, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 (meganhay@med.umich.edu).

Published Online: July 18, 2019. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2019.1737

Author Contributions: Dr Haymart had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Concept and design: Kovatch, Reyes-Gastelum, Hughes, Haymart.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.

Drafting of the manuscript: Kovatch, Reyes-Gastelum, Hughes, Haymart.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.

Statistical analysis: Kovatch, Reyes-Gastelum.

Obtained funding: Haymart.

Administrative, technical, or material support: Hughes, Hamilton, Ward, Haymart.

Supervision: Kovatch, Hughes, Haymart.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Funding/Support: This study was funded by grant R01 CA201198 from the National Cancer Institute (NCI). The collection of cancer incidence data used in this study was supported by the California Department of Public Health pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 103885; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Program of Cancer Registries, under cooperative agreement 5NU58DP006344, and the NCI SEER Program under contract HHSN261201800015I awarded to the University of Southern California. The collection of cancer incidence data in Georgia was supported by contract HHSN261201800003I, task order HHSN26100001 from the NCI and cooperative agreement 5NU58DP003875-04 from the CDC.

Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funding organizations had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Disclaimer: The ideas and opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and endorsement by the State of California and State of Georgia Departments of Public Health, the NCI, and the CDC or their contractors and subcontractors is neither intended nor should be inferred.

Meeting Presentations: This work was presented at the 2018 American Head & Neck Society Meeting; April 18, 2018; National Harbor, Maryland; and the 2018 Michigan Otolaryngologic Society Meeting; July 28, 2018; Thompsonville, Michigan.

References
1.
Davies  L, Morris  LG, Haymart  M,  et al; AACE Endocrine Surgery Scientific Committee.  American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology Disease State clinical review: the increasing incidence of thyroid cancer.  Endocr Pract. 2015;21(6):686-696. doi:10.4158/EP14466.DSCRPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Haugen  BR, Alexander  EK, Bible  KC,  et al.  2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.  Thyroid. 2016;26(1):1-133. doi:10.1089/thy.2015.0020PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Chandrasekhar  SS, Randolph  GW, Seidman  MD,  et al; American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.  Clinical practice guideline: improving voice outcomes after thyroid surgery.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;148(6)(suppl):S1-S37. doi:10.1177/0194599813487301PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Filho  JG, Kowalski  LP.  Postoperative complications of thyroidectomy for differentiated thyroid carcinoma.  Am J Otolaryngol. 2004;25(4):225-230. doi:10.1016/j.amjoto.2004.02.001PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Shonka  DC  Jr, Terris  DJ.  The American Thyroid Association guidelines on voice assessment—have we done enough?  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;142(2):115-116. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2015.3222PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Tedla  M, Chakrabarti  S, Suchankova  M, Weickert  MO.  Voice outcomes after thyroidectomy without superior and recurrent laryngeal nerve injury: VoiSS questionnaire and GRBAS tool assessment.  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;273(12):4543-4547. doi:10.1007/s00405-016-4163-6PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Stojadinovic  A, Shaha  AR, Orlikoff  RF,  et al.  Prospective functional voice assessment in patients undergoing thyroid surgery.  Ann Surg. 2002;236(6):823-832. doi:10.1097/00000658-200212000-00015PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Jeannon  JP, Orabi  AA, Bruch  GA, Abdalsalam  HA, Simo  R.  Diagnosis of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy after thyroidectomy: a systematic review.  Int J Clin Pract. 2009;63(4):624-629. doi:10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01875.xPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Grover  G, Sadler  GP, Mihai  R.  Morbidity after thyroid surgery: patient perspective.  Laryngoscope. 2013;123(9):2319-2323. doi:10.1002/lary.23850PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Delgado-Vargas  B, Lloris Romero-Salazar  A, Cobeta  I.  Vocal changes following thyroid surgery: prospective study of objective and subjective parameters.  J Voice. 2019;33(1):27-32. doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.09.012PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Jacobson  BH, Johnson  A, Grywalski  C,  et al.  The Voice Handicap Index (VHI): development and validation.  Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 1997;6(3):66-70. doi:10.1044/1058-0360.0603.66Google ScholarCrossref
12.
Rosen  CA, Lee  AS, Osborne  J, Zullo  T, Murry  T.  Development and validation of the Voice Handicap Index-10.  Laryngoscope. 2004;114(9):1549-1556. doi:10.1097/00005537-200409000-00009PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Hogikyan  ND, Sethuraman  G.  Validation of an instrument to measure voice-related quality of life (V-RQOL).  J Voice. 1999;13(4):557-569. doi:10.1016/S0892-1997(99)80010-1PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Kempster  GB, Gerratt  BR, Verdolini Abbott  K, Barkmeier-Kraemer  J, Hillman  RE.  Consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice: development of a standardized clinical protocol.  Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2009;18(2):124-132. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2008/08-0017)PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Hirano  M.  Clinical Examination of Voice. Vienna: Springer-Verlag; 1981.
16.
Franic  DM, Bramlett  RE, Bothe  AC.  Psychometric evaluation of disease specific quality of life instruments in voice disorders.  J Voice. 2005;19(2):300-315. doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2004.03.003PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Kletzien  H, Macdonald  CL, Orne  J,  et al.  Comparison between patient-perceived voice changes and quantitative voice measures in the first postoperative year after thyroidectomy: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial.  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;144(11):995-1003. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2018.0309PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Solomon  NP, Helou  LB, Henry  LR,  et al.  Utility of the voice handicap index as an indicator of postthyroidectomy voice dysfunction.  J Voice. 2013;27(3):348-354. doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.10.012PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Arffa  RE, Krishna  P, Gartner-Schmidt  J, Rosen  CA.  Normative values for the Voice Handicap Index-10.  J Voice. 2012;26(4):462-465. doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.04.006PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
R Core Team. Version 3.5.2. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2019.
21.
Papaleontiou  M, Hughes  DT, Guo  C, Banerjee  M, Haymart  MR.  Population-based assessment of complications following surgery for thyroid cancer.  J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102(7):2543-2551. doi:10.1210/jc.2017-00255PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Grovers  RM, Fowler  FJ, Couper  MP, Lepkowski  JM, Singer  E, Tourangean  R.  Survey Methodology. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Wiley; 2009.
23.
Kish  L.  Survey Sampling. New York, NY: Wiley; 1965.
24.
StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software. Version 15.1. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC; 2019.
25.
The American Association for Public Opinion Research. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. https://www.aapor.org/AAPOR_Main/media/publications/Standard-Definitions20169theditionfinal.pdf. Revised 2016. Accessed June 20, 2019.
26.
Daggumati  S, Panossian M D  H, Sataloff  RT.  Vocal fold paresis: incidence, and the relationship between Voice Handicap Index and laryngeal EMG findings  [published online July 17, 2018].  J Voice. 2018;S0892-1997(18)30202-9. doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.05.008PubMedGoogle Scholar
27.
Francis  DO, Pearce  EC, Ni  S, Garrett  CG, Penson  DF.  Epidemiology of vocal fold paralyses after total thyroidectomy for well-differentiated thyroid cancer in a Medicare population.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;150(4):548-557. doi:10.1177/0194599814521381PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Kandil  E, Noureldine  SI, Abbas  A, Tufano  RP.  The impact of surgical volume on patient outcomes following thyroid surgery.  Surgery. 2013;154(6):1346-1352. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2013.04.068PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Roy  N, Smith  ME, Dromey  C, Redd  J, Neff  S, Grennan  D.  Exploring the phonatory effects of external superior laryngeal nerve paralysis: an in vivo model.  Laryngoscope. 2009;119(4):816-826. doi:10.1002/lary.20143PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Sinagra  DL, Montesinos  MR, Tacchi  VA,  et al.  Voice changes after thyroidectomy without recurrent laryngeal nerve injury.  J Am Coll Surg. 2004;199(4):556-560. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.06.020PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
31.
Hong  KH, Kim  YK.  Phonatory characteristics of patients undergoing thyroidectomy without laryngeal nerve injury.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;117(4):399-404. doi:10.1016/S0194-5998(97)70133-5PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Soylu  L, Ozbas  S, Uslu  HY, Kocak  S.  The evaluation of the causes of subjective voice disturbances after thyroid surgery.  Am J Surg. 2007;194(3):317-322. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.10.009PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
33.
Sahli  ZT, Ansari  G, Gurakar  M,  et al.  Thyroidectomy in older adults: an American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program study of outcomes.  J Surg Res. 2018;229:20-27. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2018.03.057PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
34.
Sahli  Z, Canner  JK, Najjar  O,  et al.  Association between age and patient-reported changes in voice and swallowing after thyroidectomy.  Laryngoscope. 2019;129(2):519-524. doi:10.1002/lary.27297PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
35.
Rehmani  SS, Liu  B, Al-Ayoubi  AM,  et al.  Racial disparity in utilization of high-volume hospitals for surgical treatment of esophageal cancer.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;106(2):346-353. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.03.042PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
36.
Haider  AH, Scott  VK, Rehman  KA,  et al.  Racial disparities in surgical care and outcomes in the United States: a comprehensive review of patient, provider, and systemic factors.  J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216(3):482-92.e12. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.11.014PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
37.
Noureldine  SI, Abbas  A, Tufano  RP,  et al.  The impact of surgical volume on racial disparity in thyroid and parathyroid surgery.  Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(8):2733-2739. doi:10.1245/s10434-014-3610-0PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
38.
Loyo  M, Tufano  RP, Gourin  CG.  National trends in thyroid surgery and the effect of volume on short-term outcomes.  Laryngoscope. 2013;123(8):2056-2063. doi:10.1002/lary.23923PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
39.
Hauch  A, Al-Qurayshi  Z, Randolph  G, Kandil  E.  Total thyroidectomy is associated with increased risk of complications for low- and high-volume surgeons.  Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(12):3844-3852. doi:10.1245/s10434-014-3846-8PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
40.
Vicente  DA, Solomon  NP, Avital  I,  et al.  Voice outcomes after total thyroidectomy, partial thyroidectomy, or non-neck surgery using a prospective multifactorial assessment.  J Am Coll Surg. 2014;219(1):152-163. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.03.019PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
41.
Ryu  J, Ryu  YM, Jung  YS,  et al.  Extent of thyroidectomy affects vocal and throat functions: a prospective observational study of lobectomy versus total thyroidectomy.  Surgery. 2013;154(3):611-620. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2013.03.011PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
42.
Nam  IC, Bae  JS, Lee  SH,  et al.  Lateral neck dissection affects the voice in thyroid cancer patients.  J Laryngol Otol. 2017;131(10):853-859. doi:10.1017/S0022215117001542PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
43.
Starmer  H, Noureldine  SI, Ozgursoy  OB, Tufano  RP.  Voice outcomes following reoperative central neck dissection for recurrent/persistent thyroid cancer.  Laryngoscope. 2015;125(11):2621-2625. doi:10.1002/lary.25427PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
44.
Kuo  T-M, Mobley  LR.  How generalizable are the SEER registries to the cancer populations of the USA?  Cancer Causes Control. 2016;27(9):1117-1126. doi:10.1007/s10552-016-0790-xPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
45.
Engelsman  AF, Warhurst  S, Fraser  S, Novakovic  D, Sidhu  SB.  Influence of neural monitoring during thyroid surgery on nerve integrity and postoperative vocal function.  BJS Open. 2018;2(3):135-141. doi:10.1002/bjs5.50PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Want full access to the AMA Ed Hub?
After you sign up for AMA Membership, make sure you sign in or create a Physician account with the AMA in order to access all learning activities on the AMA Ed Hub
Buy this activity
Close
Want full access to the AMA Ed Hub?
After you sign up for AMA Membership, make sure you sign in or create a Physician account with the AMA in order to access all learning activities on the AMA Ed Hub
Buy this activity
Close
With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Education Center Collection Sign In Modal Right
Close

Name Your Search

Save Search
Close
With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Close

Lookup An Activity

or

Close

My Saved Searches

You currently have no searches saved.

Close

My Saved Courses

You currently have no courses saved.

Close
With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Education Center Collection Sign In Modal Right
Close