Collaborative Goal Setting vs Enhanced Usual Care for Depression in Adults With Diabetes | Depressive Disorders | JN Learning | AMA Ed Hub [Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]

Effect of Telephone-Delivered Collaborative Goal Setting and Behavioral Activation vs Enhanced Usual Care for Depression Among Adults With Uncontrolled DiabetesA Randomized Clinical Trial

Educational Objective
To understand if a telephone-delivered, collaborative goal-setting intervention improves depression symptoms and glycemic control.
1 Credit CME
Key Points

Question  Can a telephone-delivered, collaborative goal-setting intervention improve depression symptoms and glycemic control among high-risk, patients with comorbid diabetes identified using a population screening approach?

Findings  In this randomized clinical trial of 225 US veterans with uncontrolled diabetes and significant depression symptoms, a telephone-delivered intervention using collaborative goal setting and behavioral activation had mixed results compared with enhanced usual care. Secondary analyses found that a significantly higher proportion of intervention participants achieved and maintained clinically significant responses of depression symptoms at 12 months but did not find such improvements for glycemic levels at 12 months.

Meaning  A telephone-delivered, collaborative goal-setting approach can improve depression symptoms among high-risk patients with uncontrolled diabetes who maintain engagement for 12 months.

Abstract

Importance  Depression symptoms are present in one-third of patients with diabetes, contributing to significant adverse consequences. Population screening of high-risk patients coupled with telephone delivery of evidence-based therapies for comorbid diabetes may address barriers to care.

Objective  To evaluate the effectiveness of proactive population screening plus telephone delivery of a collaborative goal-setting intervention among high-risk patients with uncontrolled diabetes and depression.

Design, Setting, and Participants  In this randomized clinical trial, 225 participants (intervention [n = 136] and control [n = 89]) were enrolled from a regional Veterans Healthcare System serving Southeast Texas from November 1, 2012, through June 24, 2016. Data were gathered at baseline and 6 and 12 months after intervention. Patients selected had uncontrolled diabetes (hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c] >7.5%]) and clinically significant depression (Patient Health Questionnaire–9 scores [PHQ-9] ≥10) and were living more than 20 miles from the Veterans Affairs medical center. Data collection was completed on December 6, 2016, and final analyses were completed by January 25, 2018. All analyses were intent to treat.

Interventions  Healthy Outcomes Through Patient Empowerment (HOPE) included 9 telephone sessions with 24 trained health care professionals using collaborative goal-setting and behavioral activation methods. The control group received enhanced usual care (EUC) and notification of high-risk status.

Main Outcomes and Measures  Change in depression symptoms using PHQ-9 and glycemic control using HbA1c from baseline to 6 months and to 12 months. Secondary analyses evaluated clinically significant responses for these measures.

Results  Among 225 participants, 202 (89.8%) were men, the mean (SD) age was 61.9 (8.3) years, 145 (64.4%) were married, and 156 (69.3%) had some education beyond high school. For the overall study, 38 participants (16.9%) were lost to follow-up or withdrew at 6 months and another 21 (9.3%) were lost to follow-up or withdrew at 12 months. Repeated-measures analysis with multiple imputation for missing data assessing the interaction of treatment group (HOPE vs EUC) and time (baseline, 6 months, and 12 months) found no significant improvement in PHQ-9 (β, 1.56; 95% CI, –0.68 to 3.81; P = .17) or HbA1c (β, –0.005; 95% CI, –0.73 to 0.72; P = .82). Analyses using t test for change from baseline to 12 months showed a HOPE vs EUC between-group mean difference for PHQ-9 of 2.14 (95% CI, 0.18 to 4.10; P = .03) and for HbA1c of –0.06% (95% CI, –0.61% to 0.50%; P = .83). A secondary analysis of patients experiencing a clinical response found that 52.1% of HOPE participants had clinically significant responses in PHQ-9 at 12 months vs 32.9% in EUC (difference, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.04-0.33; P = .01).

Conclusions and Relevance  Telephone-delivered, collaborative goal setting produced clinically significant reductions in depression symptoms but not glycemic control among patients who remained engaged at 12 months compared with EUC among a population screened sample of high-risk patients with diabetes and depression. Although the intervention created some lasting effect for depression, additional strategies are needed to maintain engagement of this high-risk population within an interprofessional team approach to primary care.

Trial Registration  ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01572389

Sign in to take quiz and track your certificates

Buy This Activity

JN Learning™ is the home for CME and MOC from the JAMA Network. Search by specialty or US state and earn AMA PRA Category 1 CME Credit™ from articles, audio, Clinical Challenges and more. Learn more about CME/MOC

Article Information

Accepted for Publication: June 17, 2019.

Published: August 7, 2019. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8634

Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2019 Naik AD et al. JAMA Network Open.

Corresponding Author: Aanand D. Naik, MD, Houston Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, 2002 Holcombe Blvd, Ste 152, Houston, TX 77030 (anaik@bcm.edu).

Author Contributions: Drs Naik and Cully had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Concept and design: Naik, Petersen, Kunik, Cully.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.

Drafting of the manuscript: Naik, Vaughan, Petersen, Zeno, Kunik, Cully.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Naik, Hundt, Vaughan, Petersen, Kunik, Cully.

Statistical analysis: Naik, Petersen, Cully.

Obtained funding: Naik, Kunik, Cully.

Administrative, technical, or material support: Naik, Hundt, Zeno, Cully.

Supervision: Naik, Hundt, Kunik, Cully.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Drs Naik, Hundt, Kunik, and Cully reported receiving grants from the Veterans Health Administration during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.

Funding/Support: This work was supported by grant 10-135 from the Veterans Health Administration Health Services Research and Development Office (Drs Cully and Naik) and by grant K23DK11034 from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health (Dr Vaughan). The work was also supported using facilities and resources of the Veterans Health Administration Health Services Research and Development Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety through grant CIN13-413.

Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funding sources had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed reflect those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Department of Veterans Affairs, the US government, or Baylor College of Medicine.

Data Sharing Statement: See Supplement 2.

References
1.
Anderson  RJ, Freedland  KE, Clouse  RE, Lustman  PJ.  The prevalence of comorbid depression in adults with diabetes: a meta-analysis.  Diabetes Care. 2001;24(6):1069-1078. doi:10.2337/diacare.24.6.1069PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Gonzalez  JS, Peyrot  M, McCarl  LA,  et al.  Depression and diabetes treatment nonadherence: a meta-analysis.  Diabetes Care. 2008;31(12):2398-2403. doi:10.2337/dc08-1341PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Gonzalez  JS, Safren  SA, Cagliero  E,  et al.  Depression, self-care, and medication adherence in type 2 diabetes: relationships across the full range of symptom severity.  Diabetes Care. 2007;30(9):2222-2227. doi:10.2337/dc07-0158PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Black  SA, Markides  KS, Ray  LA.  Depression predicts increased incidence of adverse health outcomes in older Mexican Americans with type 2 diabetes.  Diabetes Care. 2003;26(10):2822-2828. doi:10.2337/diacare.26.10.2822PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Petrak  F, Baumeister  H, Skinner  TC, Brown  A, Holt  RIG.  Depression and diabetes: treatment and health-care delivery.  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015;3(6):472-485. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00045-5PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Cully  JA, Tolpin  L, Henderson  L, Jimenez  D, Kunik  ME, Petersen  LA.  Psychotherapy in the Veterans Health Administration: missed opportunities?  Psychol Serv. 2008;5(4):320-331. doi:10.1037/a0013719PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Atlantis  E, Fahey  P, Foster  J.  Collaborative care for comorbid depression and diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.  BMJ Open. 2014;4(4):e004706. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004706PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Johnson  JA, Al Sayah  F, Wozniak  L,  et al.  Controlled trial of a collaborative primary care team model for patients with diabetes and depression: rationale and design for a comprehensive evaluation.  BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12(1):258. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-12-258PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Ebert  DD, Nobis  S, Lehr  D,  et al.  The 6-month effectiveness of internet-based guided self-help for depression in adults with type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus.  Diabet Med. 2017;34(1):99-107. doi:10.1111/dme.13173PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Piette  JD, Richardson  C, Himle  J,  et al.  A randomized trial of telephonic counseling plus walking for depressed diabetes patients.  Med Care. 2011;49(7):641-648. doi:10.1097/MLR.0b013e318215d0c9PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Katon  WJ, Simon  G, Russo  J,  et al.  Quality of depression care in a population-based sample of patients with diabetes and major depression.  Med Care. 2004;42(12):1222-1229. doi:10.1097/00005650-200412000-00009PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Egede  LE, Ellis  C.  Diabetes and depression: global perspectives.  Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010;87(3):302-312. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2010.01.024PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
McGinnis  JM, Stuckhardt  L, Saunders  R, Smith  M, eds.  Best Care at Lower Cost: The Path to Continuously Learning Health Care in America. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2013.
14.
Krumholz  HM.  Big data and new knowledge in medicine: the thinking, training, and tools needed for a learning health system.  Health Aff (Millwood). 2014;33(7):1163-1170. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0053PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Flores  M, Glusman  G, Brogaard  K, Price  ND, Hood  L.  P4 medicine: how systems medicine will transform the healthcare sector and society.  Per Med. 2013;10(6):565-576. doi:10.2217/pme.13.57PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Roy  T, Lloyd  CE, Pouwer  F, Holt  RI, Sartorius  N.  Screening tools used for measuring depression among people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.  Diabet Med. 2012;29(2):164-175. doi:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03401.xPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Sacco  WP, Malone  JI, Morrison  AD, Friedman  A, Wells  K.  Effect of a brief, regular telephone intervention by paraprofessionals for type 2 diabetes.  J Behav Med. 2009;32(4):349-359. doi:10.1007/s10865-009-9209-4PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Suksomboon  N, Poolsup  N, Nge  YL.  Impact of phone call intervention on glycemic control in diabetes patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials.  PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e89207. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0089207PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Zhai  YK, Zhu  WJ, Cai  YL, Sun  DX, Zhao  J.  Clinical- and cost-effectiveness of telemedicine in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.  Medicine (Baltimore). 2014;93(28):e312. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000000312PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Su  D, Zhou  J, Kelley  MS,  et al.  Does telemedicine improve treatment outcomes for diabetes? a meta-analysis of results from 55 randomized controlled trials.  Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2016;116:136-148. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2016.04.019PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Hirani  SP, Rixon  L, Cartwright  M, Beynon  M, Newman  SP; WSD Evaluation Team.  The effect of telehealth on quality of life and psychological outcomes over a 12-month period in a diabetes cohort within the Whole Systems Demonstrator Cluster Randomized Trial.  JMIR Diabetes. 2017;2(2):e18. doi:10.2196/diabetes.7128PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Nobis  S, Lehr  D, Ebert  DD,  et al.  Efficacy of a web-based intervention with mobile phone support in treating depressive symptoms in adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial.  Diabetes Care. 2015;38(5):776-783. doi:10.2337/dc14-1728PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
Naik  AD, Palmer  N, Petersen  NJ,  et al.  Comparative effectiveness of goal setting in diabetes mellitus group clinics: randomized clinical trial.  Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(5):453-459. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.70PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Miller  CK, Bauman  J.  Goal setting: an integral component of effective diabetes care.  Curr Diab Rep. 2014;14(8):509. doi:10.1007/s11892-014-0509-xPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Bodenheimer  T, Handley  MA.  Goal-setting for behavior change in primary care: an exploration and status report.  Patient Educ Couns. 2009;76(2):174-180. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2009.06.001PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Lafata  JE, Morris  HL, Dobie  E, Heisler  M, Werner  RM, Dumenci  L.  Patient-reported use of collaborative goal setting and glycemic control among patients with diabetes.  Patient Educ Couns. 2013;92(1):94-99. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2013.01.016PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Powers  MA, Marrero  DG.  Response to comment on Powers et al. diabetes self-management education and support in type 2 diabetes: a joint position statement of the American Diabetes Association, the American Association of Diabetes Educators, and the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.  Diabetes Care. 2016;39(1):e17. doi:10.2337/dci15-0009PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Cuijpers  P, van Straten  A, Warmerdam  L.  Behavioral activation treatments of depression: a meta-analysis.  Clin Psychol Rev. 2007;27(3):318-326. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2006.11.001PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
DeWalt  DA, Davis  TC, Wallace  AS,  et al.  Goal setting in diabetes self-management: taking the baby steps to success.  Patient Educ Couns. 2009;77(2):218-223. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2009.03.012PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Coulter  A, Entwistle  VA, Eccles  A, Ryan  S, Shepperd  S, Perera  R.  Personalised care planning for adults with chronic or long-term health conditions.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(3):CD010523.PubMedGoogle Scholar
31.
Naik  AD, White  CD, Robertson  SM,  et al.  Behavioral health coaching for rural-living older adults with diabetes and depression: an open pilot of the HOPE study.  BMC Geriatr. 2012;12(1):37. doi:10.1186/1471-2318-12-37PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Cully  JA, Breland  JY, Robertson  S,  et al.  Behavioral health coaching for rural veterans with diabetes and depression: a patient randomized effectiveness implementation trial.  BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:191. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-14-191PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
33.
Chambers  DA, Feero  WG, Khoury  MJ.  Convergence of implementation science, precision medicine, and the learning health care system: a new model for biomedical research.  JAMA. 2016;315(18):1941-1942. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.3867PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
34.
Spitzer  RL, Kroenke  K, Williams  JB.  Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study.  JAMA. 1999;282(18):1737-1744. doi:10.1001/jama.282.18.1737PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
35.
Kroenke  K, Spitzer  RL.  The PHQ-9: a new depression diagnostic and severity measure.  Psychiatr Ann. 2002;32(9):509-515. doi:10.3928/0048-5713-20020901-06Google ScholarCrossref
36.
Katon  WJ, Von Korff  M, Lin  EH,  et al.  The Pathways Study: a randomized trial of collaborative care in patients with diabetes and depression.  Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004;61(10):1042-1049. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.61.10.1042PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
37.
Oxman  TE, Dietrich  AJ, Schulberg  HC.  The depression care manager and mental health specialist as collaborators within primary care.  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2003;11(5):507-516. doi:10.1097/00019442-200309000-00005PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
38.
Williams  JW  Jr, Gerrity  M, Holsinger  T, Dobscha  S, Gaynes  B, Dietrich  A.  Systematic review of multifaceted interventions to improve depression care.  Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2007;29(2):91-116. doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2006.12.003PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
39.
American Telemedicine Association. About telemedicine. https://www.americantelemed.org. Accessed May 30, 2018.
40.
Inzucchi  SE, Bergenstal  RM, Buse  JB,  et al; American Diabetes Association (ADA); European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD).  Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a patient-centered approach: position statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD).  Diabetes Care. 2012;35(6):1364-1379. doi:10.2337/dc12-0413PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
41.
Kraemer  HC.  Messages for clinicians: moderators and mediators of treatment outcome in randomized clinical trials.  Am J Psychiatry. 2016;173(7):672-679. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.15101333PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
42.
Cohen  J.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
43.
Newcombe  RG.  Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: comparison of eleven methods.  Stat Med. 1998;17(8):873-890. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980430)17:8<873::AID-SIM779>3.0.CO;2-IPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
44.
Deyo  RA, Cherkin  DC, Ciol  MA.  Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases.  J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45(6):613-619. doi:10.1016/0895-4356(92)90133-8PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
45.
Baumeister  H, Hutter  N, Bengel  J.  Psychological and pharmacological interventions for depression in patients with diabetes mellitus and depression.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;12:CD008381.PubMedGoogle Scholar
46.
van der Feltz-Cornelis  CM, Nuyen  J, Stoop  C,  et al.  Effect of interventions for major depressive disorder and significant depressive symptoms in patients with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.  Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2010;32(4):380-395. doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2010.03.011PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
47.
Semenkovich  K, Brown  ME, Svrakic  DM, Lustman  PJ.  Depression in type 2 diabetes mellitus: prevalence, impact, and treatment.  Drugs. 2015;75(6):577-587. doi:10.1007/s40265-015-0347-4PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
48.
Naik  AD, Dindo  LN, Van Liew  JR,  et al.  Development of a clinically feasible process for identifying individual health priorities.  J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018;66(10):1872-1879. doi:10.1111/jgs.15437PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
49.
Tinetti  M, Dindo  L, Smith  CD,  et al.  Challenges and strategies in patients’ health priorities-aligned decision-making for older adults with multiple chronic conditions.  PLoS One. 2019;14(6):e0218249. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0218249PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
50.
Blaum  CS, Rosen  J, Naik  AD,  et al.  Feasibility of implementing patient priorities care for older adults with multiple chronic conditions.  J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018;66(10):2009-2016. doi:10.1111/jgs.15465PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
51.
Cully  JA, Stanley  MA, Petersen  NJ,  et al.  Delivery of brief cognitive behavioral therapy for medically ill patients in primary care: a pragmatic randomized clinical trial.  J Gen Intern Med. 2017;32(9):1014-1024. doi:10.1007/s11606-017-4101-3PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
52.
Tinetti  ME, Naik  AD, Dodson  JA.  Moving from disease-centered to patient goals–directed care for patients with multiple chronic conditions: patient value-based care.  JAMA Cardiol. 2016;1(1):9-10. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2015.0248PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
If you are not a JN Learning subscriber, you can either:
Subscribe to JN Learning for one year
Buy this activity
jn-learning_Modal_Multimedia_LoginSubscribe_Purchase
Close
If you are not a JN Learning subscriber, you can either:
Subscribe to JN Learning for one year
Buy this activity
jn-learning_Modal_Multimedia_LoginSubscribe_Purchase
Close
With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Education Center Collection Sign In Modal Right
Close

Name Your Search

Save Search
Close
With a personal account, you can:
  • Track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
jn-learning_Modal_SaveSearch_NoAccess_Purchase
Close

Lookup An Activity

or

Close

My Saved Searches

You currently have no searches saved.

Close
With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Education Center Collection Sign In Modal Right
Close