Corresponding Author: Raphael J. Landovitz, MD, MSc, Center for Clinical AIDS Research and Education, University of California, Los Angeles, 11075 Santa Monica Blvd, Ste 100, Los Angeles, CA 90025 (rlandovitz@mednet.ucla.edu).
Accepted for Publication: September 20, 2019.
Published Online: November 18, 2019. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.5456
Author Contributions: All authors had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Study concept and design: All authors.
Drafting of the manuscript: Khalili.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Landovitz.
Administrative, technical, or material support: Landovitz.
Study supervision: Landovitz.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Landovitz reported personal fees from Gilead Sciences and Merck Sharp & Dohme during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.
5.US Preventive Services Task Force. Preexposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV infection: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement [published online June 11, 2019].
JAMA. doi:
10.1001/jama.2019.6390Google Scholar 6.Smith
DK, Van Handel
M, Wolitski
RJ,
et al. Vital signs: estimated percentages and numbers of adults with indications for preexposure prophylaxis to prevent HIV acquisition—United States, 2015.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64(46):1291-1295. doi:
10.15585/mmwr.mm6446a4PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 8.Krakower
D, Ware
N, Mitty
JA, Maloney
K, Mayer
KH. HIV providers’ perceived barriers and facilitators to implementing pre-exposure prophylaxis in care settings: a qualitative study.
AIDS Behav. 2014;18(9):1712-1721. doi:
10.1007/s10461-014-0839-3PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 10.Saag
MS, Benson
CA, Gandhi
RT,
et al. Antiretroviral drugs for treatment and prevention of HIV infection in adults: 2018 recommendations of the International Antiviral Society-USA Panel.
JAMA. 2018;320(4):379-396. doi:
10.1001/jama.2018.8431PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 11.Kamis
KF, Marx
GE, Scott
KA,
et al. Same-day HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) initiation during drop-in sexually transmitted diseases clinic appointments is a highly acceptable, feasible, and safe model that engages individuals at risk for HIV into PrEP care.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019;6(7):ofz310. doi:
10.1093/ofid/ofz310PubMedGoogle Scholar 12.Cottrell
ML, Yang
KH, Prince
HM,
et al. A Translational pharmacology approach to predicting outcomes of preexposure prophylaxis against HIV in men and women using tenofovir disoproxil fumarate with or without emtricitabine.
J Infect Dis. 2016;214(1):55-64. doi:
10.1093/infdis/jiw077PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 15.Antoni
G, Tremblay
C, Charreau
I,
et al; ANRS IPERGAY Study Group. On-demand PrEP with TDF/FTC remains highly effective among MSM with infrequent sexual intercourse: a sub-study of the ANRS IPERGAY trial. Abstract number TUAC0102. Presented at: 9th International AIDS Society (IAS) Conference; July 25, 2017; Paris, France.
16.Pilkington
V, Hill
A, Hughes
S, Nwokolo
N, Pozniak
A. How safe is TDF/FTC as PrEP? a systematic review and meta-analysis of the risk of adverse events in 13 randomised trials of PrEP.
J Virus Erad. 2018;4(4):215-224.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 18.Nanayakkara
DD, Sun
X, Morris
S,
et al. Effect of vitamin D supplementation on bone turnover markers during HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis using tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-emtricitabine in men who have sex with men.
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2019;35(7):608-614. doi:
10.1089/aid.2018.0280PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 19.Traeger
MW, Cornelisse
VJ, Asselin
J,
et al; PrEPX Study Team. Association of HIV preexposure prophylaxis with incidence of sexually transmitted infections among individuals at high risk of HIV infection.
JAMA. 2019;321(14):1380-1390. doi:
10.1001/jama.2019.2947PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 20.Jenness
SM, Weiss
KM, Goodreau
SM,
et al. Incidence of gonorrhea and chlamydia following human immunodeficiency virus preexposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men: a modeling study.
Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65(5):712-718. doi:
10.1093/cid/cix439PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 25.Hoornenborg
E, Prins
M, Achterbergh
RCA,
et al; Amsterdam PrEP Project team in the HIV Transmission Elimination AMsterdam Consortium (H-TEAM). Acquisition of wild-type HIV-1 infection in a patient on pre-exposure prophylaxis with high intracellular concentrations of tenofovir diphosphate: a case report.
Lancet HIV. 2017;4(11):e522-e528. doi:
10.1016/S2352-3018(17)30132-7PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 26.Smith
DK, Switzer
WM, Peters
P,
et al. A strategy for PrEP clinicians to manage ambiguous HIV test results during follow-up visits.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018;5(8):ofy180. Published online July 21, 2018. doi:
10.1093/ofid/ofy180PubMedGoogle Scholar 28.Choopanya
K, Martin
M, Suntharasamai
P,
et al; Bangkok Tenofovir Study Group. Antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV infection in injecting drug users in Bangkok, Thailand (the Bangkok Tenofovir Study): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial.
Lancet. 2013;381(9883):2083-2090. doi:
10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61127-7PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 30.Hare
CB, Coll
J, Ruane
R,
et al. The Phase 3 DISCOVER Study: Daily F/TAF or F/TDF for HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis. Abstract 104LB. Presented at: Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI); March 4-7, 2019; Seattle, WA.