Want to take quizzes and track your credits?
Is proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use associated with increased risk of fracture in children?
This pediatric cohort compared 115 933 patients who initiated PPI use with 115 933 matched individuals who did not initiate use and found that PPI use was associated with an 11% increased risk of fracture, a significant difference.
These data suggest that PPI use is associated with a small increased risk of fracture in children; the findings inform safety considerations when these drugs are prescribed to pediatric patients.
Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use has been linked to increased risk of fracture in adults. Despite a trend in prescription of PPIs in children, there is scarce evidence regarding this safety concern in pediatric patients.
To evaluate the association between PPI use and risk of fracture in children.
This nationwide register-based cohort study included data from Sweden from July 2006 to December 2016. Children younger than 18 years who initiated PPI use were matched on propensity score and age with those who did not initiate PPI use.
Initiation of PPI use.
Main Outcomes and Measures
Cox regression was adopted to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for a first fracture of any type and 5 subtypes of fracture, with follow-up for up to 5 years. To address potential residual confounding, high-dimensional propensity score matching and a direct comparison with histamine-2 receptor antagonists were performed.
There were a total of 115 933 pairs of children included. During a mean (SD) of 2.2 (1.6) years of follow-up, 5354 and 4568 cases of any fracture occurred among those who initiated PPIs vs those who did not, respectively (20.2 vs 18.3 events per 1000 person-years; hazard ratio [HR], 1.11 [95% CI, 1.06-1.15]). Use of PPIs was associated with increased risk of upper-limb fracture (HR, 1.08 [95% CI, 1.03-1.13]), lower-limb fracture (HR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.10-1.29]), and other fractures (HR, 1.51 [95% CI, 1.16-1.97]) but not head fracture (HR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.76-1.13]) or spine fracture (HR, 1.31 [95% CI, 0.95-1.81]). The HRs for fracture according to cumulative duration of PPI use were 1.08 (95% CI, 1.03-1.13) for 30 days or less, 1.14 (95% CI, 1.09-1.20) for 31 to 364 days, and 1.34 (95% CI, 1.13-1.58) for 365 days or more. The association was consistent in most sensitivity analyses, including high-dimensional propensity score matching (HR, 1.10 [95% CI, 1.06-1.15]), although the analysis of PPI vs histamine-2 receptor antagonist did not reach statistical significance (HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.97-1.15]).
Conclusions and Relevance
In this large pediatric cohort, PPI use was associated with a small but significant increased risk of any fracture. Risk of fracture should be taken into account when weighing the benefits and risks of PPI treatment in children.
Sign in to take quiz and track your certificates
JN Learning™ is the home for CME and MOC from the JAMA Network. Search by specialty or US state and earn AMA PRA Category 1 CME Credit™ from articles, audio, Clinical Challenges and more. Learn more about CME/MOC
CME Disclosure Statement: Unless noted, all individuals in control of content reported no relevant financial relationships. If applicable, all relevant financial relationships have been mitigated.
Accepted for Publication: December 4, 2019.
Corresponding Author: Yun-Han Wang, MSc, BPharm, Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Eugeniahemmet T2, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden (firstname.lastname@example.org).
Published Online: March 16, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.0007
Author Contributions: Ms Wang and Dr Pasternak had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Concept and design: Wang, Wintzell, Pasternak.
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.
Drafting of the manuscript: Wang.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
Statistical analysis: Wang.
Obtained funding: Pasternak.
Administrative, technical, or material support: Wang, Wintzell, Pasternak.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Svanström has received consulting fees from Celgene and is employed by IQVIA, outside of the submitted work. Dr Ludvigsson coordinates on behalf of the Swedish Inflammatory Bowel Disease Register (SWIBREG) a study that has received funding from Janssen Corporation. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest. No other disclosures were reported.
Funding/Support: Swedish Research Council and Frimurare Barnhuset Foundation supported this study, and Dr Pasternak was supported by an investigator grant from the Strategic Research Area Epidemiology program at Karolinska Institutet.
Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
You currently have no searches saved.
You currently have no courses saved.