Want to take quizzes and track your credits?
What is the association of initial certification by the American Board of Surgery and examination performance with future risk of severe disciplinary actions against medical licenses?
In this study of 44 290 surgeons, board certification and examination performance were associated with lower rates of severe disciplinary actions against medical licenses.
This study provides evidence that supports board certification as a marker of surgeon quality and professionalism.
Board certification is used as a marker of surgeon quality and professionalism. Although some research has linked certification in surgery to outcomes, more research is needed.
To measure associations between surgeons obtaining American Board of Surgery (ABS) certification and examination performance with receiving future severe disciplinary actions against their medical licenses.
Design, Setting, and Participants
Retrospective analysis of severe license action rates for surgeons who attempted ABS certification based on certification status and examination performance. Surgeons who attempted to become certified were classified as certified or failing to obtain certification. Additionally, groups were further categorized based on whether the surgeon had to repeat examinations and whether they ultimately passed. The study included surgeons who initially attempted certification between 1976 and 2017 (n = 44 290). Severe license actions from 1976 to 2018 were obtained from the Federation of State Medical Boards, and certification data were obtained from the ABS database. Data were analyzed between 1978 and 2008.
Main Outcomes and Measures
Severe license action rates were analyzed across certified surgeons and those failing to obtain certification, as well as across examination performance groups.
The final dataset included 36 197 men (81.7%) and 8093 women (18.3%). The incidence of severe license actions was significantly greater for surgeons who attempted and failed to obtain certification (incidence rate per 1000 person-years = 2.49; 95% CI, 2.13-2.85) than surgeons who were certified (incidence rate per 1000 person years = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.71-0.83). Adjusting for sex and international medical graduate status, the risk of receiving a severe license action across time was also significantly greater for surgeons who failed to obtain certification. Surgeons who progressed further in the certification examination sequence and had fewer repeated examinations had a lower incidence and less risk over time of receiving severe license actions.
Conclusions and Relevance
Obtaining board certification was associated with a lower rate of receiving severe license actions from a state medical board. Passing examinations in the certification examination process on the first attempt was also associated with lower severe license action rates. This study provides supporting evidence that board certification is 1 marker of surgeon quality and professionalism.
Sign in to take quiz and track your certificates
JN Learning™ is the home for CME and MOC from the JAMA Network. Search by specialty or US state and earn AMA PRA Category 1 CME Credit™ from articles, audio, Clinical Challenges and more. Learn more about CME/MOC
CME Disclosure Statement: Unless noted, all individuals in control of content reported no relevant financial relationships. If applicable, all relevant financial relationships have been mitigated.
Corresponding Author: Jason P. Kopp, PhD, American Board of Surgery, 1617 John F. Kennedy Blvd, Ste 860, Philadelphia, PA 19103 (email@example.com).
Accepted for Publication: January 19, 2020.
Published Online: March 18, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0093
Author Contributions: Dr Kopp had full access to all of the data in the study and takes full responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Concept and design: Kopp, Jones, Pei, Young, Rizzo, Buyske.
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Kopp, Ibáñez, Jones, Pei, Young, Arnhart.
Drafting of the manuscript: Kopp, Jones, Pei, Young, Buyske.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Kopp, Ibáñez, Jones, Pei, Arnhart, Rizzo.
Statistical analysis: Kopp, Ibáñez, Jones.
Administrative, technical, or material support: Kopp, Jones, Pei, Arnhart, Rizzo, Buyske.
Supervision: Kopp, Jones, Pei, Young, Rizzo.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.
You currently have no searches saved.
You currently have no courses saved.