[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]

Association Between Initiation of Pulmonary Rehabilitation After Hospitalization for COPD and 1-Year Survival Among Medicare Beneficiaries

Educational Objective
To learn the association between initiating pulmonary rehabilitation and the risk of subsequent mortality among patients recently discharged after hospitalization for COPD.
1 Credit CME
Key Points

Question  Is initiation of pulmonary rehabilitation after hospitalization for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) associated with better survival?

Findings  In this retrospective observational study that included 197 376 Medicare beneficiaries discharged after hospitalization for COPD, initiation of pulmonary rehabilitation within 3 months of discharge, compared with later or no initiation of pulmonary rehabilitation, was significantly associated with lower risk of mortality at 1 year (hazard ratio, 0.63).

Meaning  These findings support current guideline recommendations for pulmonary rehabilitation after hospitalization for COPD, although the potential for residual confounding exists and further research is needed.

Abstract

Importance  Meta-analyses have suggested that initiating pulmonary rehabilitation after an exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was associated with improved survival, although the number of patients studied was small and heterogeneity was high. Current guidelines recommend that patients enroll in pulmonary rehabilitation after hospital discharge.

Objective  To determine the association between the initiation of pulmonary rehabilitation within 90 days of hospital discharge and 1-year survival.

Design, Setting, and Patients  This retrospective, inception cohort study used claims data from fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for COPD in 2014, at 4446 acute care hospitals in the US. The final date of follow-up was December 31, 2015.

Exposures  Initiation of pulmonary rehabilitation within 90 days of hospital discharge.

Main Outcomes and Measures  The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 1 year. Time from discharge to death was modeled using Cox regression with time-varying exposure to pulmonary rehabilitation, adjusting for mortality and for unbalanced characteristics and propensity to initiate pulmonary rehabilitation. Additional analyses evaluated the association between timing of pulmonary rehabilitation and mortality and between number of sessions completed and mortality.

Results  Of 197 376 patients (mean age, 76.9 years; 115 690 [58.6%] women), 2721 (1.5%) initiated pulmonary rehabilitation within 90 days of discharge. A total of 38 302 (19.4%) died within 1 year of discharge, including 7.3% of patients who initiated pulmonary rehabilitation within 90 days and 19.6% of patients who initiated pulmonary rehabilitation after 90 days or not at all. Initiation within 90 days was significantly associated with lower risk of death over 1 year (absolute risk difference [ARD], –6.7% [95% CI, –7.9% to –5.6%]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.63 [95% CI, 0.57 to 0.69]; P < .001). Initiation of pulmonary rehabilitation was significantly associated with lower mortality across start dates ranging from 30 days or less (ARD, –4.6% [95% CI, –5.9% to –3.2%]; HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.67 to 0.82]; P < .001) to 61 to 90 days after discharge (ARD, –11.1% [95% CI, –13.2% to –8.4%]; HR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.30 to 0.54]; P < .001). Every 3 additional sessions was significantly associated with lower risk of death (HR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.85 to 0.98]; P = .01).

Conclusions and Relevance  Among fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for COPD, initiation of pulmonary rehabilitation within 3 months of discharge was significantly associated with lower risk of mortality at 1 year. These findings support current guideline recommendations for pulmonary rehabilitation after hospitalization for COPD, although the potential for residual confounding exists and further research is needed.

Sign in to take quiz and track your certificates

Buy This Activity

JN Learning™ is the home for CME and MOC from the JAMA Network. Search by specialty or US state and earn AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ from articles, audio, Clinical Challenges and more. Learn more about CME/MOC

CME Disclosure Statement: Unless noted, all individuals in control of content reported no relevant financial relationships. If applicable, all relevant financial relationships have been mitigated.

Article Information

Corresponding Author: Peter K. Lindenauer, MD, MSc, Institute for Healthcare Delivery and Population Science, University of Massachusetts Medical School—Baystate, 3601 Main St, Springfield, MA 01199 (peter.lindenauer@baystatehealth.org).

Accepted for Publication: March 16, 2020.

Author Contributions: Drs Lindenauer and Pekow had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Concept and design: Lindenauer, Stefan, Pekow, Mazor, Lagu, ZuWallack.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Lindenauer, Stefan, Pekow, Priya, Spitzer, Pack, Pinto-Plata, ZuWallack.

Drafting of the manuscript: Lindenauer, Pekow, Priya.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Stefan, Pekow, Mazor, Priya, Spitzer, Lagu, Pack, Pinto-Plata, ZuWallack.

Statistical analysis: Pekow, Priya.

Obtained funding: Lindenauer.

Administrative, technical, or material support: Lindenauer, Spitzer, Lagu.

Supervision: Lindenauer, Pekow, Lagu, Pinto-Plata.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Lagu reported serving as a consultant for the Yale Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, under contract to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Dr Pack reported receiving a grant from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K23HL135440-01A1). No other disclosures were reported.

Funding/Support: The research was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health under grants K24 HL132008-01 and 5R01HL133046-02.

Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

References
1.
Croft  JB , Wheaton  AG , Liu  Y ,  et al.  Urban-rural county and state differences in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease—United States, 2015.   MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67(7):205-211. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6707a1PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Ford  ES .  Hospital discharges, readmissions, and ED visits for COPD or bronchiectasis among US adults: findings from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2001-2012 and Nationwide Emergency Department Sample 2006-2011.   Chest. 2015;147(4):989-998. doi:10.1378/chest.14-2146PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Lindenauer  PK , Dharmarajan  K , Qin  L , Lin  Z , Gershon  AS , Krumholz  HM .  Risk trajectories of readmission and death in the first year after hospitalization for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.   Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;197(8):1009-1017. doi:10.1164/rccm.201709-1852OCPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Spruit  MA , Singh  SJ , Garvey  C ,  et al; ATS/ERS Task Force on Pulmonary Rehabilitation.  An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: key concepts and advances in pulmonary rehabilitation.   Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188(8):e13-e64. doi:10.1164/rccm.201309-1634STPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
McCarthy  B , Casey  D , Devane  D , Murphy  K , Murphy  E , Lacasse  Y .  Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.   Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2(2):CD003793. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003793.pub3PubMedGoogle Scholar
6.
Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: 2020 Report. Published 2020. Accessed February 19, 2020. https://goldcopd.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/GOLD-2020-FINAL-ver1.2-03Dec19_WMV.pdf
7.
Cox  NS , Oliveira  CC , Lahham  A , Holland  AE .  Pulmonary rehabilitation referral and participation are commonly influenced by environment, knowledge, and beliefs about consequences: a systematic review using the Theoretical Domains Framework.   J Physiother. 2017;63(2):84-93. doi:10.1016/j.jphys.2017.02.002PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Maddocks  M , Kon  SSC , Singh  SJ , Man  WD-C .  Rehabilitation following hospitalization in patients with COPD: can it reduce readmissions?   Respirology. 2015;20(3):395-404. doi:10.1111/resp.12454PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Nici  L , Raskin  J , Rochester  CL ,  et al.  Pulmonary rehabilitation: what we know and what we need to know.   J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2009;29(3):141-151. doi:10.1097/HCR.0b013e3181a3324aPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Puhan  MA , Gimeno-Santos  E , Cates  CJ , Troosters  T .  Pulmonary rehabilitation following exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.   Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;12:CD005305. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005305.pub4PubMedGoogle Scholar
11.
Ryrsø  CK , Godtfredsen  NS , Kofod  LM ,  et al.  Lower mortality after early supervised pulmonary rehabilitation following COPD-exacerbations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.   BMC Pulm Med. 2018;18(1):154. doi:10.1186/s12890-018-0718-1PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Criner  GJ , Bourbeau  J , Diekemper  RL ,  et al.  Prevention of acute exacerbations of COPD: American College of Chest Physicians and Canadian Thoracic Society Guideline.   Chest. 2015;147(4):894-942. doi:10.1378/chest.14-1676PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Wedzicha  JA , Miravitlles  M , Hurst  JR ,  et al.  Management of COPD exacerbations: a European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society guideline.   Eur Respir J. 2017;49(3):1600791. doi:10.1183/13993003.00791-2016PubMedGoogle Scholar
14.
Newhouse  JP , McClellan  M .  Econometrics in outcomes research: the use of instrumental variables.   Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19(1):17-34. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.17PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Concato  J .  Study design and “evidence” in patient-oriented research.   Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;187(11):1167-1172. doi:10.1164/rccm.201303-0521OEPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Frieden  TR .  Evidence for health decision making—beyond randomized, controlled trials.   N Engl J Med. 2017;377(5):465-475. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1614394PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Ray  WA .  Evaluating medication effects outside of clinical trials: new-user designs.   Am J Epidemiol. 2003;158(9):915-920. doi:10.1093/aje/kwg231PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Cox  E , Martin  BC , Van Staa  T , Garbe  E , Siebert  U , Johnson  ML .  Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: approaches to mitigate bias and confounding in the design of nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report—Part II.   Value Health. 2009;12(8):1053-1061. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00601.xPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.  Accounting for Social Risk Factors in Medicare Payment: Identifying Social Risk Factors. National Academies Press; 2016.
20.
Spitzer  KA , Stefan  MS , Priya  A ,  et al.  Participation in pulmonary rehabilitation after hospitalization for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among Medicare beneficiaries.   Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019;16(1):99-106. doi:10.1513/AnnalsATS.201805-332OCPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Elixhauser  A , Steiner  C , Harris  DR , Coffey  RM .  Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data.   Med Care. 1998;36(1):8-27. doi:10.1097/00005650-199801000-00004PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Quan  H , Sundararajan  V , Halfon  P ,  et al.  Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data.   Med Care. 2005;43(11):1130-1139. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000182534.19832.83PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
Segal  JB , Chang  H-Y , Du  Y , Walston  JD , Carlson  MC , Varadhan  R .  Development of a claims-based frailty indicator anchored to a well-established frailty phenotype.   Med Care. 2017;55(7):716-722. doi:10.1097/MLR.0000000000000729PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Austin  PC .  Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples.   Stat Med. 2009;28(25):3083-3107. doi:10.1002/sim.3697PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
VanderWeele  TJ , Ding  P .  Sensitivity analysis in observational research: introducing the E-value.   Ann Intern Med. 2017;167(4):268-274. doi:10.7326/M16-2607PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Haneuse  S , VanderWeele  TJ , Arterburn  D .  Using the E-value to assess the potential effect of unmeasured confounding in observational studies.   JAMA. 2019;321(6):602-603. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.21554PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Curtis  LH , Hammill  BG , Eisenstein  EL , Kramer  JM , Anstrom  KJ .  Using inverse probability-weighted estimators in comparative effectiveness analyses with observational databases.   Med Care. 2007;45(10)(suppl 2):S103-S107. doi:10.1097/MLR.0b013e31806518acPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Kurth  T , Walker  AM , Glynn  RJ ,  et al.  Results of multivariable logistic regression, propensity matching, propensity adjustment, and propensity-based weighting under conditions of nonuniform effect.   Am J Epidemiol. 2006;163(3):262-270. doi:10.1093/aje/kwj047PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Suaya  JA , Stason  WB , Ades  PA , Normand  S-LT , Shepard  DS .  Cardiac rehabilitation and survival in older coronary patients.   J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54(1):25-33. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.01.078PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Yang  D , Dalton  JE . Paper 335-2012: A Unified Approach to Measuring the Effect Size Between Two Groups Using SAS. Published 2012. Accessed April 8, 2020. https://www.lerner.ccf.org/qhs/software/lib/stddiff.pdf
31.
Greening  NJ , Williams  JEA , Hussain  SF ,  et al.  An early rehabilitation intervention to enhance recovery during hospital admission for an exacerbation of chronic respiratory disease: randomised controlled trial.   BMJ. 2014;349:g4315. doi:10.1136/bmj.g4315PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Rochester  CL , Vogiatzis  I , Holland  AE ,  et al; ATS/ERS Task Force on Policy in Pulmonary Rehabilitation.  An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society policy statement: enhancing implementation, use, and delivery of pulmonary rehabilitation.   Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;192(11):1373-1386. doi:10.1164/rccm.201510-1966STPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
33.
Brookhart  MA , Patrick  AR , Dormuth  C ,  et al.  Adherence to lipid-lowering therapy and the use of preventive health services: an investigation of the healthy user effect.   Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166(3):348-354. doi:10.1093/aje/kwm070PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
34.
Celli  BR , Cote  CG , Marin  JM ,  et al.  The body-mass index, airflow obstruction, dyspnea, and exercise capacity index in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.   N Engl J Med. 2004;350(10):1005-1012. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa021322PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
35.
Casaburi  R , ZuWallack  R .  Pulmonary rehabilitation for management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.   N Engl J Med. 2009;360(13):1329-1335. doi:10.1056/NEJMct0804632PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
36.
Spruit  MA , Pitta  F , Garvey  C ,  et al; ERS Rehabilitation and Chronic Care, and Physiotherapists Scientific Groups; American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; ATS Pulmonary Rehabilitation Assembly and the ERS COPD Audit team.  Differences in content and organisational aspects of pulmonary rehabilitation programmes.   Eur Respir J. 2014;43(5):1326-1337. doi:10.1183/09031936.00145613PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
AMA CME Accreditation Information

Credit Designation Statement: The American Medical Association designates this Journal-based CME activity activity for a maximum of 1.00  AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

Successful completion of this CME activity, which includes participation in the evaluation component, enables the participant to earn up to:

  • 1.00 Medical Knowledge MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine's (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program;;
  • 1.00 Self-Assessment points in the American Board of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery’s (ABOHNS) Continuing Certification program;
  • 1.00 MOC points in the American Board of Pediatrics’ (ABP) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program;
  • 1.00 Lifelong Learning points in the American Board of Pathology’s (ABPath) Continuing Certification program; and
  • 1.00 CME points in the American Board of Surgery’s (ABS) Continuing Certification program

It is the CME activity provider's responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting MOC credit.

Close
Want full access to the AMA Ed Hub?
After you sign up for AMA Membership, make sure you sign in or create a Physician account with the AMA in order to access all learning activities on the AMA Ed Hub
Buy this activity
Close
Want full access to the AMA Ed Hub?
After you sign up for AMA Membership, make sure you sign in or create a Physician account with the AMA in order to access all learning activities on the AMA Ed Hub
Buy this activity
Close
With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Education Center Collection Sign In Modal Right
Close

Name Your Search

Save Search
With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Close
Close

Lookup An Activity

or

My Saved Searches

You currently have no searches saved.

Close

My Saved Courses

You currently have no courses saved.

Close