Association of Visual Acuity Improvement With Uncorrected Refractive Error in Patients New to Low Vision Clinics | Ophthalmology | JN Learning | AMA Ed Hub [Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]

Association of Visual Acuity Improvement With Uncorrected Refractive Error in Patients New to Low Vision Clinics

Educational Objective
To assess the magnitude of visual acuity (VA) improvement associated with uncorrected refractive error among adults under ophthalmic care who obtain low vision rehabilitation services and identify the characteristics of the patients who are most likely to experience improvement.
1 Credit CME
Key Points

Question  What is the association of visual acuity improvement and uncorrected refractive error in patients with ocular disease who are new to low vision clinics?

Findings  In this cases series, 27.8% of patients with mean visual acuity of 20/100 had at least 2-line acuity improvement; this finding was more likely seen in working-age adults aged 40 to <65 years, African American patients, or those with moderate vision impairment.

Meaning  The findings suggest that refractive evaluation should be emphasized in patients under care for ocular disease.

Abstract

Importance  There is substantial socioeconomic and individual burden from uncorrected refractive error (URE) and chronic ocular disease. Understanding the association of visual acuity (VA) reduction with URE and the adults most likely to benefit from refraction may help support clinical decision-making in ophthalmologic care and maximize patient outcomes.

Objectives  To assess the magnitude of VA improvement associated with URE among adults under ophthalmic care who obtain low vision rehabilitation (LVR) services and identify the characteristics of the patients who are most likely to experience improvement.

Design, Setting, and Participants  This retrospective case series assessed patients 20 years or older who were new to the LVR clinics from August 1, 2013, to December 31, 2015, and who had habitual VA between 20/40 and counting fingers (not including) and underwent refraction. Data analysis was performed from April 4, 2018, to December 20, 2019.

Exposures  Patient demographics and clinical data, including habitual and refraction VA, refraction, and disease diagnosis. Habitual VA was categorized as mild (VA worse than 20/40 and at least 20/60), moderate (VA worse than 20/60 and better than 20/200), severe (VA 20/200 or worse and better than 20/500), and profound (VA 20/500 or worse) vision impairment (VI).

Main Outcomes and Measures  At least 2-line VA improvement and any VA improvement (≥1-line) by refraction.

Results  Among the 2923 patients new to LVR clinics, 1773 (mean [SD] age, 70 [18.2] years; 1069 [60.3%] female) were included in these analyses. The mean habitual VA was 20/100 (mean [SD], 0.67 [0.36] logMAR). At least 2-line improvement was observed in 493 patients (27.8%), and any VA improvement was seen in 1023 patients (57.7%). At least 2-line improvement was observed in 54 patients (34.8%) with corneal disorders and was more likely seen among patients aged 40 to <65 years compared with those aged 20 to <40 years (odds ratio [OR], 1.57; 95% CI, 1.02–2.41), African American patients compared with white patients (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.08-1.85), or patients with moderate VI compared with mild VI (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.07-1.72).

Conclusions and Relevance  The findings suggest that URE is prevalent among patients with ocular disease and accessing LVR and that refractive evaluation should be considered for patients with ocular disease and reduced VA, especially working-age adults aged 40 to <65 years, African American patients, and those with moderate VI.

Sign in to take quiz and track your certificates

Buy This Activity

JN Learning™ is the home for CME and MOC from the JAMA Network. Search by specialty or US state and earn AMA PRA Category 1 CME Credit™ from articles, audio, Clinical Challenges and more. Learn more about CME/MOC

Article Information

Accepted for Publication: April 5, 2020.

Corresponding Author: Judith E. Goldstein, OD, Vision Rehabilitation Services, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, 600 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287 (jgolds28@jhmi.edu).

Published Online: May 21, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.1677

Author Contributions: Drs Guo and Goldstein had full access to all the data and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Concept and design: All authors.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Guo, Goldstein.

Drafting of the manuscript: All authors.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.

Statistical analysis: All authors.

Obtained funding: Goldstein.

Administrative, technical, or material support: Goldstein.

Supervision: Goldstein.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Funding/Support: This study was funded by the Reader’s Digest Partners for Sight Foundation (Dr Goldstein).

Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funding source had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

References
1.
Naidoo  KS , Leasher  J , Bourne  RR ,  et al; Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study.  Global vision impairment and blindness due to uncorrected refractive error, 1990-2010.   Optom Vis Sci. 2016;93(3):227-234. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000796 PubMedGoogle Scholar
2.
Vitale  S , Ellwein  L , Cotch  MF , Ferris  FL  III , Sperduto  R .  Prevalence of refractive error in the United States, 1999-2004.   Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(8):1111-1119. doi:10.1001/archopht.126.8.1111 PubMedGoogle Scholar
3.
Chia  EM , Mitchell  P , Ojaimi  E , Rochtchina  E , Wang  JJ .  Assessment of vision-related quality of life in an older population subsample: the Blue Mountains Eye Study.   Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2006;13(6):371-377. doi:10.1080/09286580600864794 PubMedGoogle Scholar
4.
Willis  JR , Vitale  SE , Agrawal  Y , Ramulu  PY .  Visual impairment, uncorrected refractive error, and objectively measured balance in the United States.   JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013;131(8):1049-1056. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.316 PubMedGoogle Scholar
5.
Zebardast  N , Swenor  BK , van Landingham  SW ,  et al.  Comparing the impact of refractive and nonrefractive vision loss on functioning and disability: the Salisbury Eye Evaluation.   Ophthalmology. 2015;122(6):1102-1110. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.02.024 PubMedGoogle Scholar
6.
Tahhan  N , Papas  E , Fricke  TR , Frick  KD , Holden  BA .  Utility and uncorrected refractive error.   Ophthalmology. 2013;120(9):1736-1744. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.02.014 PubMedGoogle Scholar
7.
Owsley  C , McGwin  G  Jr , Scilley  K , Meek  GC , Seker  D , Dyer  A .  Effect of refractive error correction on health-related quality of life and depression in older nursing home residents.   Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125(11):1471-1477. doi:10.1001/archopht.125.11.1471 PubMedGoogle Scholar
8.
Coleman  AL , Yu  F , Keeler  E , Mangione  CM .  Treatment of uncorrected refractive error improves vision-specific quality of life.   J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54(6):883-890. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00817.x PubMedGoogle Scholar
9.
Frank  RN .  On aging and vision: no time to lament.   JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019;137(1):11-12. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.4207 PubMedGoogle Scholar
10.
Schneider  J , Leeder  SR , Gopinath  B , Wang  JJ , Mitchell  P .  Frequency, course, and impact of correctable visual impairment (uncorrected refractive error).   Surv Ophthalmol. 2010;55(6):539-560. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2010.02.004 PubMedGoogle Scholar
11.
Brady  CJ , Villanti  AC , Gandhi  M , Friedman  DS , Keay  L .  Visual function after correction of distance refractive error with ready-made and custom spectacles: a randomized clinical trial.   Ophthalmology. 2012;119(10):2014-2020. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.03.051 PubMedGoogle Scholar
12.
Foran  S , Rose  K , Wang  JJ , Mitchell  P .  Correctable visual impairment in an older population: the Blue Mountains Eye Study.   Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;134(5):712-719. doi:10.1016/S0002-9394(02)01673-2 PubMedGoogle Scholar
13.
Uribe  JA , Swenor  BK , Muñoz  BE , West  SK .  Uncorrected refractive error in a Latino population: Proyecto VER.   Ophthalmology. 2011;118(5):805-811. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.09.015 PubMedGoogle Scholar
14.
Tielsch  JM , Sommer  A , Witt  K , Katz  J , Royall  RM .  Blindness and visual impairment in an American urban population: the Baltimore Eye Survey.   Arch Ophthalmol. 1990;108(2):286-290. doi:10.1001/archopht.1990.01070040138048 PubMedGoogle Scholar
15.
Muñoz  B , West  SK , Rodriguez  J ,  et al.  Blindness, visual impairment and the problem of uncorrected refractive error in a Mexican-American population: Proyecto VER.   Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43(3):608-614.PubMedGoogle Scholar
16.
Naël  V , Moreau  G , Monfermé  S ,  et al.  Prevalence and associated factors of uncorrected refractive error in older adults in a population-based study in France.   JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019;137(1):3-11. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.4229 PubMedGoogle Scholar
17.
VanNewkirk  MR , Weih  L , McCarty  CA , Taylor  HR .  Cause-specific prevalence of bilateral visual impairment in Victoria, Australia: the Visual Impairment Project.   Ophthalmology. 2001;108(5):960-967. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(01)00554-1 PubMedGoogle Scholar
18.
Sunness  JS , El Annan  J .  Improvement of visual acuity by refraction in a low-vision population.   Ophthalmology. 2010;117(7):1442-1446. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.11.017 PubMedGoogle Scholar
19.
Goldstein  JE , Chun  MW , Fletcher  DC , Deremeik  JT , Massof  RW ; Low Vision Research Network Study Group.  Visual ability of patients seeking outpatient low vision services in the United States.   JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014;132(10):1169-1177. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.1747 PubMedGoogle Scholar
20.
Goldstein  JE , Jackson  ML , Fox  SM , Deremeik  JT , Massof  RW ; Low Vision Research Network Study Group.  Clinically meaningful rehabilitation outcomes of low vision patients served by outpatient clinical centers.   JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015;133(7):762-769. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.0693 PubMedGoogle Scholar
21.
Kiser  AK , Mladenovich  D , Eshraghi  F , Bourdeau  D , Dagnelie  G .  Reliability and consistency of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity measures in advanced eye disease.   Optom Vis Sci. 2005;82(11):946-954. doi:10.1097/01.opx.0000187863.12609.7b PubMedGoogle Scholar
22.
Bailey  IL , Lovie-Kitchin  JE .  Visual acuity testing. From the laboratory to the clinic.   Vision Res. 2013;90:2-9. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2013.05.004 PubMedGoogle Scholar
23.
Bressler  SB , Ayala  AR , Bressler  NM ,  et al; Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network.  Persistent macular thickening after ranibizumab treatment for diabetic macular edema with vision impairment.   JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134(3):278-285. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.5346 PubMedGoogle Scholar
24.
Qiu  M , Wang  SY , Singh  K , Lin  SC .  Racial disparities in uncorrected and undercorrected refractive error in the United States.   Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(10):6996-7005. doi:10.1167/iovs.13-12662 PubMedGoogle Scholar
25.
Shi  Q , Zhao  Y , Fonseca  V , Krousel-Wood  M , Shi  L .  Racial disparity of eye examinations among the U.S. working-age population with diabetes: 2002-2009.   Diabetes Care. 2014;37(5):1321-1328. doi:10.2337/dc13-1038 PubMedGoogle Scholar
26.
Friedman  DS , West  SK , Munoz  B ,  et al.  Racial variations in causes of vision loss in nursing homes: The Salisbury Eye Evaluation in Nursing Home Groups (SEEING) Study.   Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122(7):1019-1024. doi:10.1001/archopht.122.7.1019 PubMedGoogle Scholar
27.
Li  YJ , Xirasagar  S , Pumkam  C , Krishnaswamy  M , Bennett  CL .  Vision insurance, eye care visits, and vision impairment among working-age adults in the United States.   JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013;131(4):499-506. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.1165 PubMedGoogle Scholar
28.
Claridge  KG , Galbraith  JK , Karmel  V , Bates  AK .  The effect of trabeculectomy on refraction, keratometry and corneal topography.   Eye (Lond). 1995;9(pt 3):292-298. doi:10.1038/eye.1995.57 PubMedGoogle Scholar
29.
Sabadia  SB , Nolan  RC , Galetta  KM ,  et al.  20/40 or better visual acuity after optic neuritis: not as good as we once thought?   J Neuroophthalmol. 2016;36(4):369-376. doi:10.1097/WNO.0000000000000421 PubMedGoogle Scholar
30.
Sakai  RE , Feller  DJ , Galetta  KM , Galetta  SL , Balcer  LJ .  Vision in multiple sclerosis: the story, structure-function correlations, and models for neuroprotection.   J Neuroophthalmol. 2011;31(4):362-373. doi:10.1097/WNO.0b013e318238937f PubMedGoogle Scholar
31.
Kaštelan  S , Gverović-Antunica  A , Pelčić  G , Gotovac  M , Marković  I , Kasun  B .  Refractive changes associated with diabetes mellitus.   Semin Ophthalmol. 2018;33(7-8):838-845. doi:10.1080/08820538.2018.1519582 PubMedGoogle Scholar
32.
Karadeniz Ugurlu  S , Kocakaya Altundal  AE , Altin Ekin  M .  Comparison of vision-related quality of life in primary open-angle glaucoma and dry-type age-related macular degeneration.   Eye (Lond). 2017;31(3):395-405. doi:10.1038/eye.2016.219 PubMedGoogle Scholar
If you are not a JN Learning subscriber, you can either:
Subscribe to JN Learning for one year
Buy this activity
jn-learning_Modal_Multimedia_LoginSubscribe_Purchase
Close
If you are not a JN Learning subscriber, you can either:
Subscribe to JN Learning for one year
Buy this activity
jn-learning_Modal_Multimedia_LoginSubscribe_Purchase
Close
With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Education Center Collection Sign In Modal Right
Close

Name Your Search

Save Search
Close
With a personal account, you can:
  • Track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
jn-learning_Modal_SaveSearch_NoAccess_Purchase
Close

Lookup An Activity

or

Close

My Saved Searches

You currently have no searches saved.

Close
With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Education Center Collection Sign In Modal Right
Close