Plans of US Parents Regarding School Attendance for Their Children in the Fall of 2020 | Infectious Diseases | JN Learning | AMA Ed Hub [Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 18.206.177.17. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]

Plans of US Parents Regarding School Attendance for Their Children in the Fall of 2020A National Survey

Educational Objective
To understand how parents are preparing their children for the reopening of schools in the Fall
1 Credit CME
Key Points

Question  What do parents plan to do about school attendance in the fall of 2020, and what factors are influencing these plans?

Findings  In this survey study of 730 US parents of school-aged children, 31% of parents indicated they will probably or definitely keep their child home this fall if schools open for in-person instruction. Factors associated with planning to keep children home were lower household income, not being employed, and whether those employed had a flexible and controllable work schedule.

Meaning  Outreach to help families make decisions about school attendance should focus on addressing the concerns of families with low income.

Abstract

Importance  As schools consider reopening for in-person instruction prior to availability of a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine, families may be weighing their priorities regarding school attendance.

Objective  To characterize the association of planned in-person school attendance during the COVID-19 pandemic with factors, including family socioeconomic characteristics, and parent attitudes and beliefs about their child’s school attendance.

Design, Setting, and Participants  Cross-sectional survey study. Data were collected from June 2, 2020, to June 5, 2020, weighted to reflect population norms, and analyzed using ordered probit regression. A sample of US parents (of children ages 5-17 years) were recruited using a nonprobability survey panel with stratification by socioeconomic characteristics.

Main Outcomes and Measures  The main outcome was parent-reported plan to send their child to school or keep their child home, conditional on their school opening for in-person instruction. Additional measures assessed family socioeconomic characteristics, medical vulnerability, worry about COVID-19 and multisystem inflammatory syndrome, confidence in their child’s school, and homeschooling difficulties.

Results  The sample of 730 parents was balanced by parent sex (53% women) with successful oversampling for Black (28%; n = 201) and Hispanic (27%; n = 200) participants. In estimates weighted to US population norms, 31% (95% CI, 27% to 34%) of participants indicated they would probably or definitely keep their child home this fall, and 49% indicated that they would probably or definitely send their child to school this fall. Factors associated with planning to keep children home included lower income (38% with incomes <$50 000 vs 21% with incomes $100 000-$150 000 per year; difference, 17%; 95% CI, 9% to 26%), being unemployed (40% unemployed vs 26% employed; difference, 14%; 95% CI, 5% to 25%), and having a flexible job (33% with flexible jobs vs 19% with inflexible jobs; difference, 14%; 95% CI, 5% to 30%). Planning to keep children home was also associated with fear of COVID-19 (B = 0.19; P < .001), fear of multisystem inflammatory syndrome (B = 0.12; P = .04), confidence in schools (B = −0.22; P < .001), and challenges of homeschooling (B = −0.12; P = .01). Race and ethnicity were not significantly associated with plans to keep children home.

Conclusions and Relevance  In this survey study, many parents planned to keep children home in fall 2020. Schools need to act soon to address parental concerns and provide options for what will be available for them should they opt to keep their child home. Structural barriers, such as lack of workplace flexibility and potential school-level inequities in implementation of preventive measures, must be acknowledged and addressed where possible.

Sign in to take quiz and track your certificates

Buy This Activity

JN Learning™ is the home for CME and MOC from the JAMA Network. Search by specialty or US state and earn AMA PRA Category 1 CME Credit™ from articles, audio, Clinical Challenges and more. Learn more about CME/MOC

Article Information

Corresponding Author: Emily Kroshus, ScD, MPH, Seattle Children's Research Institute, 2001 Eighth Ave, Seattle, WA 98105 (ekroshus@u.washington.edu).

Accepted for Publication: July 30, 2020.

Published Online: August 14, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.3864

Author Contributions: Drs Kroshus and Hawrilenko had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Concept and design: All authors.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Kroshus, Hawrilenko, Christakis.

Drafting of the manuscript: Kroshus, Hawrilenko.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Hawrilenko, Tandon, Christakis.

Statistical analysis: Hawrilenko.

Administrative, technical, or material support: Kroshus.

Supervision: Christakis.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Disclaimer: Dr Christakis is Editor of JAMA Pediatrics, but he was not involved in any of the decisions regarding review of the manuscript or its acceptance.

References
1.
Hsiang  S , Allen  D , Annan-Phan  S ,  et al.  The effect of large-scale anti-contagion policies on the COVID-19 pandemic.   Nature. 2020:1-9. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2404-8PubMedGoogle Scholar
2.
Flaxman  S , Mishra  S , Gandy  A ,  et al; Imperial College COVID-19 Response Team.  Estimating the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 in Europe.   Nature. 2020:1-8. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2405-7PubMedGoogle Scholar
3.
Kuhfeld  M , Soland  J , Tarasawa  B , Johnson  A , Ruzek  E , Liu  J . Projecting the potential impacts of COVID-19 school closures on academic achievement. EdWorkingPapers.com. Published online May 4, 2020. Accessed June 5, 2020. https://www.edworkingpapers.com/ai20-226
4.
Brooks  SK , Webster  RK , Smith  LE ,  et al.  The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence.   Lancet. 2020;395(10227):912-920. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Aviles  AM , Anderson  TR , Davila  ER .  Child and adolescent social-emotional development within the context of school.   Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2006;11(1):32-39. doi:10.1111/j.1475-3588.2005.00365.xGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Liu  JJ , Bao  Y , Huang  X , Shi  J , Lu  L .  Mental health considerations for children quarantined because of COVID-19.   Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020;4(5):347-349. doi:10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30096-1PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Cluver  L , Lachman  JM , Sherr  L ,  et al.  Parenting in a time of COVID-19.   Lancet. 2020;395(10231):e64. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30736-4PubMedGoogle Scholar
8.
Viner  RM , Russell  SJ , Croker  H ,  et al.  School closure and management practices during coronavirus outbreaks including COVID-19: a rapid systematic review.   Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020;4(5):397-404. doi:10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30095-XPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Douglas  M , Katikireddi  SV , Taulbut  M , McKee  M , McCartney  G .  Mitigating the wider health effects of covid-19 pandemic response.   BMJ. 2020;369:m1557. doi:10.1136/bmj.m1557PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Dorn  AV , Cooney  RE , Sabin  ML , Sabin  ML .  COVID-19 exacerbating inequalities in the US.   Lancet. 2020;395(10232):1243-1244. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30893-XPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Van Lancker  W , Parolin  Z .  COVID-19, school closures, and child poverty: a social crisis in the making.   Lancet Public Health. 2020;5(5):e243-e244. doi:10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30084-0PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Armitage  R , Nellums  LB .  Considering inequalities in the school closure response to COVID-19.   Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(5):e644. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30116-9PubMedGoogle Scholar
13.
Greenberg-Worisek  AJ , Kurani  S , Finney Rutten  LJ , Blake  KD , Moser  RP , Hesse  BW .  Tracking healthy people 2020 internet, broadband, and mobile device access goals: an update using data from the health information national trends survey.   J Med internet Res. 2019;21(6):e13300. doi:10.2196/13300PubMedGoogle Scholar
14.
Dooley  DG , Bandealy  A , Tschudy  MM .  Low-income children and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the US.   JAMA Pediatr. 2020. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.2065PubMedGoogle Scholar
15.
Kossek  EE , Lautsch  BA .  Work–life flexibility for whom? occupational status and work–life inequality in upper, middle, and lower level jobs.   Acad Manag Ann. 2017;12(1):5-36. doi:10.5465/annals.2016.0059Google ScholarCrossref
16.
Deniz Can  D , Ginsburg-Block  M.   Parenting stress and home-based literacy interactions in low-income preschool families.   J Appl Dev Psychol. 2016;46:51-62. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2016.07.002Google ScholarCrossref
17.
Verdoni  L , Mazza  A , Gervasoni  A ,  et al.  An outbreak of severe Kawasaki-like disease at the Italian epicentre of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic: an observational cohort study.   Lancet. 2020;395(10239):1771-1778. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31103-XPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Baker  BD . America’s Most Financially Disadvantaged School Districts and How They Got That Way: How State and Local Governance Causes School Funding Disparities. Center for American Progress. Published 2014. Accessed June 16, 2020. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED561094
19.
Simpkins  SD , Fredricks  JA , Lin  AR . Families and organized after-school activities for youth. In: APA Handbook of Contemporary Family Psychology: Applications and Broad Impact of Family Psychology, Vol. 2. 2019:235-248. doi:10.1037/0000100-015
20.
Brown  M , Pitt-Catsouphes  M.   A mediational model of workplace flexibility, work–family conflict, and perceived stress among caregivers of older adults.   Community Work Fam. 2016;19(4):379-395. doi:10.1080/13668803.2015.1034656Google ScholarCrossref
21.
The Return of the Multi-Generational Family Household. Pew Res Center’s Soc Demogr Trends Proj. Accessed July 24, 2020. https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2010/03/18/the-return-of-the-multi-generational-family-household/
22.
Tucker-Seeley  RD , Li  Y , Sorensen  G , Subramanian  SV .  Lifecourse socioeconomic circumstances and multimorbidity among older adults.   BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1):313. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-313PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
Chandler  J , Rosenzweig  C , Moss  AJ , Robinson  J , Litman  L .  Online panels in social science research: expanding sampling methods beyond Mechanical Turk.   Behav Res Methods. 2019;51(5):2022-2038. doi:10.3758/s13428-019-01273-7PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Callegaro  M , DiSogra  C.   Computing response metrics for online panels.   Public Opin Q. 2008;72(5):1008-1032. doi:10.1093/poq/nfn065Google ScholarCrossref
25.
Standard Definitions - AAPOR. Accessed July 24, 2020. https://www.aapor.org/Standards-Ethics/Standard-Definitions-(1).aspx
26.
Gee  GC , Ro  MJ , Rimoin  AW .  Seven reasons to care about racism and COVID-19 and seven things to do to stop it.   Am J Public Health. 2020;110(7):954-955. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2020.305712Google ScholarCrossref
27.
Raifman  MA , Raifman  JR .  Disparities in the population at risk of severe illness from COVID-19 by race/ethnicity and income.   Am J Prev Med. 2020;59(1):137-139. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2020.04.003PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
The COVID-19 pandemic: a call to action to identify and address racial and ethnic disparities. Europe PMC. Accessed July 24, 2020. https://europepmc.org/article/med/32306369
29.
Taylor  S , Landry  CA , Paluszek  MM , Fergus  TA , McKay  D , Asmundson  GJG .  Development and initial validation of the COVID stress scales.   J Anxiety Disord. 2020;72:102232. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102232PubMedGoogle Scholar
30.
Lumley  T.   Analysis of complex survey samples.   J Stat Softw. 2004;9(1):1-19. doi:10.18637/jss.v009.i08Google Scholar
31.
Deville  J-C , Särndal  C-E , Sautory  O .  Generalized raking procedures in survey sampling.   J Am Stat Assoc. 1993;88(423):1013-1020. doi:10.1080/01621459.1993.10476369Google ScholarCrossref
32.
Bureau  UC . Current Population Survey Data Tables. The United States Census Bureau. Accessed June 15, 2020. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/cps/data/tables.html
33.
Agresti  A .  Modelling ordered categorical data: recent advances and future challenges.   Stat Med. 1999;18(17-18):2191-2207. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990915/30)18:17/18<2191::AID-SIM249>3.0.CO;2-MPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
34.
Winship  C , Radbill  L.   Sampling weights and regression analysis.   Sociol Methods Res. 1994;23(2):230-257. doi:10.1177/0049124194023002004Google ScholarCrossref
35.
Mplus User’s Guide. Accessed June 15, 2020. https://www.statmodel.com/html_ug.shtml
36.
Benjamini  Y , Hochberg  Y.   Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing.   J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol. 1995;57(1):289-300. doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.xGoogle Scholar
37.
Murphy  J.   The social and educational outcomes of homeschooling.   Sociol Spectr. 2014;34(3):244-272. doi:10.1080/02732173.2014.895640Google ScholarCrossref
38.
Martin-Chang  S , Levesque  K.  Academic Achievement. In:  The Wiley Handbook of Home Education. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2017:121-134. doi:10.1002/9781118926895.ch5
39.
Davies  NG , Klepac  P , Liu  Y , Prem  K , Jit  M , Eggo  RM ; CMMID COVID-19 working group.  Age-dependent effects in the transmission and control of COVID-19 epidemics.   Nat Med. 2020:1-7. doi:10.1038/s41591-020-0962-9PubMedGoogle Scholar
40.
Schools Should Prioritize Reopening in Fall 2020, Especially for Grades K-5, While Weighing Risks and Benefits | National Academies. Accessed July 20, 2020. https://www.nationalacademies.org/news/2020/07/schools-should-prioritize-reopening-in-fall-2020-especially-for-grades-k-5-while-weighing-risks-and-benefits
42.
Yank  V , Agarwal  S , Loftus  P , Asch  S , Rehkopf  D .  Crowdsourced health data: comparability to a US national survey, 2013-2015.   Am J Public Health. 2017;107(8):1283-1289. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2017.303824PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
43.
Leiner  DJ .  Too fast, too straight, too weird: non-reactive indicators for meaningless data in internet surveys.   Surv Res Methods. 2019;13(3):229-248. doi:10.18148/srm/2019.v13i3.7403Google Scholar
If you are not a JN Learning subscriber, you can either:
Subscribe to JN Learning for one year
Buy this activity
jn-learning_Modal_Multimedia_LoginSubscribe_Purchase
Close
If you are not a JN Learning subscriber, you can either:
Subscribe to JN Learning for one year
Buy this activity
jn-learning_Modal_Multimedia_LoginSubscribe_Purchase
Close
With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Education Center Collection Sign In Modal Right
Close

Name Your Search

Save Search
Close
With a personal account, you can:
  • Track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
jn-learning_Modal_SaveSearch_NoAccess_Purchase
Close

Lookup An Activity

or

Close

My Saved Searches

You currently have no searches saved.

Close
With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Education Center Collection Sign In Modal Right
Close