Risk of Hematologic Malignant Neoplasms From Abdominopelvic CT Radiation | Emergency Medicine | JN Learning | AMA Ed Hub [Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]

Risk of Hematologic Malignant Neoplasms From Abdominopelvic Computed Tomographic Radiation in Patients Who Underwent Appendectomy

Educational Objective
To identify the extent to which abdominopelvic computed tomography radiation may be associated with future hematologic malignant neoplasm.
1 Credit CME
Key Points

Question  Is there a risk of hematologic malignant neoplasms from abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) radiation when reverse causation bias is controlled for by defining the reasons for CT scan?

Findings  In this nationwide population-based cohort study that included 825 820 patients who underwent appendectomy for acute appendicitis, there was a substantial excess risk of hematologic malignant neoplasms in the CT-exposed group compared with the CT-unexposed group. The carcinogenic risk was most pronounced in patients aged 0 to 15 years.

Meaning  In this study, perioperative abdominopelvic CT was associated with a higher incidence of hematologic malignant neoplasms.

Abstract

Importance  Whether computed tomography (CT) radiation is truly carcinogenic remains controversial. Large epidemiological studies that purportedly showed an association between CT radiation and carcinogenesis were limited by confounding by indication and reverse causation, because the reasons for CT examination were unknown.

Objective  To measure the risk of hematologic malignant neoplasms associated with perioperative abdominopelvic CT radiation among patients who underwent appendectomy for acute appendicitis.

Design, Setting, and Participants  This nationwide population-based cohort study used the National Health Insurance Service claims database in South Korea to assess 825 820 patients who underwent appendectomy for appendicitis from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2015, and had no underlying risk factors for cancer. Patients were divided into CT-exposed (n = 306 727) or CT-unexposed (n = 519 093) groups. The study was terminated on December 31, 2017, and data were analyzed from October 30, 2018, to September 27, 2020.

Exposures  Perioperative abdominopelvic CT examination from 7 days before to 7 days after appendectomy.

Main Outcomes and Measures  The primary outcome was the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of hematologic malignant neoplasms for both groups. The secondary outcomes were IRR of abdominopelvic organ cancers and IRR of all cancers. The lag period was 2 years for the primary outcome and 5 years for secondary outcomes. The IRRs were calculated using Poisson regression models with adjustment for age and sex.

Results  Among the study population of 825 820 patients (52.9% male; median age, 28 [interquartile range, 15-41] years), hematologic malignant neoplasms developed in 323 patients in the CT-exposed group during 1 486 518 person-years and 500 patients in the CT-unexposed group during 3 422 059 person-years. For all hematologic malignant neoplasms, the IRR for the CT-exposed vs CT-unexposed group was 1.26 (95% CI, 1.09-1.45; P = .002). In terms of individual categories of hematologic malignant neoplasms, the CT-exposed group had an elevated risk only for leukemia (IRR, 1.40 [98.75% CI, 1.04-1.87, adjusted by Bonferroni correction]; P = .005). There was no between-group difference in incidence rate of abdominopelvic organ cancers (IRR, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.00-1.15]; P = .06) and that of all cancers (IRR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.99-1.09]; P = .14).

Conclusions and Relevance  This study controlled for reverse causation bias by defining the reasons for CT scan, and findings suggest that abdominopelvic CT radiation is associated with a higher incidence of hematologic malignant neoplasms. Efforts should be continued for judicious use of CT examinations.

Sign in to take quiz and track your certificates

Buy This Activity

JN Learning™ is the home for CME and MOC from the JAMA Network. Search by specialty or US state and earn AMA PRA Category 1 CME Credit™ from articles, audio, Clinical Challenges and more. Learn more about CME/MOC

Article Information

Accepted for Publication: November 7, 2020.

Published Online: January 20, 2021. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2020.6357

Corresponding Author: Ji Hoon Park, MD, PhD, Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 82, Gumi-ro 173 Beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do 13620, Korea (pjihoon79@gmail.com).

Author Contributions: Dr Kyung Hee Lee and Mr Seungjae Lee contributed equally as co–first authors. Dr Park had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Concept and design: Kyung Hee Lee, S. Lee, Park, Kyoung Ho Lee.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Kyung Hee Lee, S. Lee, Park, S. S. Lee, H. Kim, W. J. Lee, Cha, K. Kim, W. Lee, J. Y. Lee.

Drafting of the manuscript: Kyung Hee Lee, Park, S. S. Lee, H. Kim, K. Kim.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Kyung Hee Lee, S. Lee, Park, W. J. Lee, Cha, W. Lee, J. Y. Lee, Kyoung Ho Lee.

Statistical analysis: Kyung Hee Lee, S. Lee, Park, S. S. Lee, K. Kim, W. Lee.

Obtained funding: Park.

Administrative, technical, or material support: Park.

Supervision: Kyung Hee Lee, S. Lee, Park, W. J. Lee, J. Y. Lee.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Kyung Hee Lee reported receiving grants from the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Korea government outside the submitted work. Dr Park reported receiving grants from the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education and Seoul National University Bundang Hospital Research Fund. No other disclosures were reported.

Funding/Support: This research was supported by grant NRF-2018R1D1A1B07050976 for the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea from the Ministry of Education and grant 14-2018-008 from the Seoul National University Bundang Hospital Research Fund.

Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The sponsors had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Additional Contributions: Choonsik Lee, PhD, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, provided advice in improving the manuscript, for which he was not compensated.

References
1.
Walsh  L , Shore  R , Auvinen  A , Jung  T , Wakeford  R .  Risks from CT scans—what do recent studies tell us?   J Radiol Prot. 2014;34(1):E1-E5. doi:10.1088/0952-4746/34/1/E1 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Boice  JD  Jr .  Radiation epidemiology and recent paediatric computed tomography studies.   Ann ICRP. 2015;44(1, suppl):236-248. doi:10.1177/0146645315575877 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Harvey  HB , Brink  JA , Frush  DP .  Informed consent for radiation risk from CT is unjustified based on the current scientific evidence.   Radiology. 2015;275(2):321-325. doi:10.1148/radiol.2015142859 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Pearce  MS , Salotti  JA , Little  MP ,  et al.  Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study.   Lancet. 2012;380(9840):499-505. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60815-0 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Mathews  JD , Forsythe  AV , Brady  Z ,  et al.  Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians.   BMJ. 2013;346:f2360. doi:10.1136/bmj.f2360 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Huang  WY , Muo  CH , Lin  CY ,  et al.  Paediatric head CT scan and subsequent risk of malignancy and benign brain tumour: a nation-wide population-based cohort study.   Br J Cancer. 2014;110(9):2354-2360. doi:10.1038/bjc.2014.103 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Meulepas  JM , Ronckers  CM , Smets  AMJB ,  et al.  Radiation exposure from pediatric CT scans and subsequent cancer risk in the Netherlands.   J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019;111(3):256-263. doi:10.1093/jnci/djy104 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Hong  JY , Han  K , Jung  JH , Kim  JS .  Association of exposure to diagnostic low-dose ionizing radiation with risk of cancer among youths in South Korea.   JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(9):e1910584. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10584 PubMedGoogle Scholar
9.
Shore  RE , Beck  HL , Boice  JD ,  et al.  Implications of recent epidemiologic studies for the linear nonthreshold model and radiation protection.   J Radiol Prot. 2018;38(3):1217-1233. doi:10.1088/1361-6498/aad348PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Journy  N , Rehel  JL , Ducou Le Pointe  H ,  et al.  Are the studies on cancer risk from CT scans biased by indication? elements of answer from a large-scale cohort study in France.   Br J Cancer. 2015;112(1):185-193. doi:10.1038/bjc.2014.526 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Krille  L , Dreger  S , Schindel  R ,  et al.  Risk of cancer incidence before the age of 15 years after exposure to ionising radiation from computed tomography: results from a German cohort study.   Radiat Environ Biophys. 2015;54(1):1-12. doi:10.1007/s00411-014-0580-3 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Berrington de Gonzalez  A , Salotti  JA , McHugh  K ,  et al.  Relationship between paediatric CT scans and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: assessment of the impact of underlying conditions.   Br J Cancer. 2016;114(4):388-394. doi:10.1038/bjc.2015.415 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Coursey  CA , Nelson  RC , Patel  MB ,  et al.  Making the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: do more preoperative CT scans mean fewer negative appendectomies? a 10-year study.   Radiology. 2010;254(2):460-468. doi:10.1148/radiol.09082298 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Cuschieri  J , Florence  M , Flum  DR ,  et al; SCOAP Collaborative.  Negative appendectomy and imaging accuracy in the Washington State surgical care and outcomes assessment program.   Ann Surg. 2008;248(4):557-563.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Park  JH ; LOCAT Group.  Diagnostic imaging utilization in cases of acute appendicitis: multi-center experience.   J Korean Med Sci. 2014;29(9):1308-1316. doi:10.3346/jkms.2014.29.9.1308 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Ferris  M , Quan  S , Kaplan  BS ,  et al.  The global incidence of appendicitis: a systematic review of population-based studies.   Ann Surg. 2017;266(2):237-241. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000002188 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Little  MP , Wakeford  R , Borrego  D ,  et al.  Leukaemia and myeloid malignancy among people exposed to low doses (<100 mSv) of ionising radiation during childhood: a pooled analysis of nine historical cohort studies.   Lancet Haematol. 2018;5(8):e346-e358. doi:10.1016/S2352-3026(18)30092-9 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
 Basic anatomical and physiological data for use in radiological protection: reference values: ICRP publication 89.   Ann ICRP. 2002;32(3-4):1-277. doi:10.1016/S0146-6453(03)00002-2PubMedGoogle Scholar
19.
ClinicalTrials.gov. CT carcinogenic risk in patients with appendicitis. NCT03776435. Accessed December 5, 2020. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03776435
20.
Vandenbroucke  JP , von Elm  E , Altman  DG ,  et al; STROBE Initiative.  Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration.   PLoS Med. 2007;4(10):e297. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040297 PubMedGoogle Scholar
21.
Benchimol  EI , Smeeth  L , Guttmann  A ,  et al; RECORD Working Committee.  The reporting of studies conducted using observational routinely-collected health data (RECORD) statement.   PLoS Med. 2015;12(10):e1001885. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001885 PubMedGoogle Scholar
22.
Medical Radiation Bulletin Board. Guidelines for the reference level of diagnosis in computed tomography: diagnostic reference level in Korea—national survey in 2008. Updated March 8, 2008. Accessed April 1, 2020. http://www.cdc.go.kr/board.es?mid=a20305050000&bid=0003&act=view&list_no=127231
23.
Hwang  JY , Do  KH , Yang  DH ,  et al.  A survey of pediatric CT protocols and radiation doses in South Korean hospitals to optimize the radiation dose for pediatric CT scanning.   Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94(50):e2146. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000002146 PubMedGoogle Scholar
24.
Kim  KP , Berrington de González  A , Pearce  MS ,  et al.  Development of a database of organ doses for paediatric and young adult CT scans in the United Kingdom.   Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012;150(4):415-426. doi:10.1093/rpd/ncr429 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Miglioretti  DL , Johnson  E , Williams  A ,  et al.  The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk.   JAMA Pediatr. 2013;167(8):700-707. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.311 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Berrington de Gonzalez  A , Journy  N , Lee  C ,  et al.  No association between radiation dose from pediatric CT scans and risk of subsequent Hodgkin lymphoma.   Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017;26(5):804-806. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-1011 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Effects of ionizing radiation: UNSCEAR 2006 report to the general assembly, with scientific annexes. Updated June 26, 2016. Accessed December 5, 2020. https://www.unscear.org/unscear/en/publications/2006_1.html
28.
Hwangbo  Y , Kang  D , Kang  M ,  et al.  Incidence of diabetes after cancer development: a Korean national cohort study.   JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(8):1099-1105. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.1684 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Kim  GA , Lim  YS , Han  S ,  et al.  High risk of hepatocellular carcinoma and death in patients with immune-tolerant-phase chronic hepatitis B.   Gut. 2018;67(5):945-952. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314904 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Seo  HJ , Oh  IH , Yoon  SJ .  A comparison of the cancer incidence rates between the national cancer registry and insurance claims data in Korea.   Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(12):6163-6168. doi:10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.12.6163 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
31.
Siegel  RL , Miller  KD , Jemal  A .  Cancer statistics, 2020.   CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(1):7-30. doi:10.3322/caac.21590 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Hsu  WL , Preston  DL , Soda  M ,  et al.  The incidence of leukemia, lymphoma and multiple myeloma among atomic bomb survivors: 1950-2001.   Radiat Res. 2013;179(3):361-382. doi:10.1667/RR2892.1 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
33.
Ozasa  K , Grant  EJ , Kodama  K .  Japanese legacy cohorts: the life span study atomic bomb survivor cohort and survivors’ offspring.   J Epidemiol. 2018;28(4):162-169. doi:10.2188/jea.JE20170321 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
34.
Drake  FT , Florence  MG , Johnson  MG ,  et al; SCOAP Collaborative.  Progress in the diagnosis of appendicitis: a report from Washington State’s surgical care and outcomes assessment program.   Ann Surg. 2012;256(4):586-594. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31826a9602 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
35.
Raman  SS , Osuagwu  FC , Kadell  B , Cryer  H , Sayre  J , Lu  DS .  Effect of CT on false positive diagnosis of appendicitis and perforation.   N Engl J Med. 2008;358(9):972-973. doi:10.1056/NEJMc0707000 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
36.
LOCAT Group.  Low-dose CT for the diagnosis of appendicitis in adolescents and young adults (LOCAT): a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.   Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;2(11):793-804. doi:10.1016/S2468-1253(17)30247-9 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
37.
Kim  K , Kim  YH , Kim  SY ,  et al.  Low-dose abdominal CT for evaluating suspected appendicitis.   N Engl J Med. 2012;366(17):1596-1605. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1110734 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
38.
Hendee  WR , O’Connor  MK .  Radiation risks of medical imaging: separating fact from fantasy.   Radiology. 2012;264(2):312-321. doi:10.1148/radiol.12112678 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
39.
Ekpo  EU , Adejoh  T , Akwo  JD ,  et al.  Diagnostic reference levels for common computed tomography (CT) examinations: results from the first Nigerian nationwide dose survey.   J Radiol Prot. 2018;38(2):525-535. doi:10.1088/1361-6498/aaaaf8 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
If you are not a JN Learning subscriber, you can either:
Subscribe to JN Learning for one year
Buy this activity
jn-learning_Modal_Multimedia_LoginSubscribe_Purchase
Close
If you are not a JN Learning subscriber, you can either:
Subscribe to JN Learning for one year
Buy this activity
jn-learning_Modal_Multimedia_LoginSubscribe_Purchase
Close
With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Education Center Collection Sign In Modal Right
Close

Name Your Search

Save Search
Close
With a personal account, you can:
  • Track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
jn-learning_Modal_SaveSearch_NoAccess_Purchase
Close

Lookup An Activity

or

Close

My Saved Searches

You currently have no searches saved.

Close
With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Education Center Collection Sign In Modal Right
Close