[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]

Rethinking Routine Peripheral Intravenous Line PlacementA Teachable Moment

Educational Objective
To describe the relative benefit vs harm of the routine insertion of peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) in patients who are hospitalized.
1 Credit CME

A 40-year-old woman with sickle cell disease and a history of numerous deep vein thromboses presented to the emergency department in an acute pain crisis with pain focused in her hips and lower back. A peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) was placed in her left arm for fluid administration.

The PIVC infiltrated and was no longer usable by the next day. The patient’s clinical status remained stable, and her pain was controlled with oral analgesics, albeit at a higher dose than her home regimen. Even though the patient was able to hydrate with oral fluids, the medicine team placed another PIVC in her left arm as a precaution. Soon thereafter, the second PIVC infiltrated and the patient’s left arm became swollen and tender at the insertion site. She reported sweats and general malaise. Multiple unsuccessful attempts were made to place another PIVC to administer antibiotics for possible infectious phlebitis. While waiting for PIVC placement, the patient began treatment with a course of oral antibiotics. The following day, a PIVC was placed in her right forearm. This third PIVC subsequently infiltrated, and the insertion site became inflamed. Results of an ultrasonography showed phlebitis in both arms. Despite a lack of intravenous access, the patient improved with oral antibiotics, oral pain medications, and oral rehydration (ie, electrolyte replacement solutions and water) and without further complication until she was discharged to home.

Sign in to take quiz and track your certificates

Buy This Activity

JN Learning™ is the home for CME and MOC from the JAMA Network. Search by specialty or US state and earn AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ from articles, audio, Clinical Challenges and more. Learn more about CME/MOC

CME Disclosure Statement: Unless noted, all individuals in control of content reported no relevant financial relationships. If applicable, all relevant financial relationships have been mitigated.

Article Information

Corresponding Author: Tarik Silk, MD, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 550 First Ave, New York, NY 10016 (tarik.silk@nyulangone.org).

Published Online: April 19, 2021. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.1212

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Additional Contributions: We thank the patient for granting permission to publish this information.

References
1.
Ray-Barruel  G , Cooke  M , Mitchell  M , Chopra  V , Rickard  CM .  Implementing the I-DECIDED clinical decision-making tool for peripheral intravenous catheter assessment and safe removal: protocol for an interrupted time-series study.   BMJ Open. 2018;8(6):e021290. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021290PubMedGoogle Scholar
2.
Becerra  MB , Shirley  D , Safdar  N .  Prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes of idle intravenous catheters: an integrative review.   Am J Infect Control. 2016;44(10):e167-e172. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2016.03.073PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Helm  RE , Klausner  JD , Klemperer  JD , Flint  LM , Huang  E .  Accepted but unacceptable: peripheral IV catheter failure.   J Infus Nurs. 2015;38(3):189-203. doi:10.1097/NAN.0000000000000100PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Webster  J , Osborne  S , Rickard  CM , Marsh  N .  Clinically-indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters.   Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;1(1):CD007798. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007798.pub5PubMedGoogle Scholar
5.
Patel  SA , Alebich  MM , Feldman  LS .  Routine replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters.   J Hosp Med. 2017;12(1):42-45. doi:10.1002/jhm.2676PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
AMA CME Accreditation Information

Credit Designation Statement: The American Medical Association designates this Journal-based CME activity activity for a maximum of 1.00  AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

Successful completion of this CME activity, which includes participation in the evaluation component, enables the participant to earn up to:

  • 1.00 Medical Knowledge MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine's (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program;;
  • 1.00 Self-Assessment points in the American Board of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery’s (ABOHNS) Continuing Certification program;
  • 1.00 MOC points in the American Board of Pediatrics’ (ABP) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program;
  • 1.00 Lifelong Learning points in the American Board of Pathology’s (ABPath) Continuing Certification program; and
  • 1.00 credit toward the CME of the American Board of Surgery’s Continuous Certification program

It is the CME activity provider's responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting MOC credit.

Close
Want full access to the AMA Ed Hub?
After you sign up for AMA Membership, make sure you sign in or create a Physician account with the AMA in order to access all learning activities on the AMA Ed Hub
Buy this activity
Close
Want full access to the AMA Ed Hub?
After you sign up for AMA Membership, make sure you sign in or create a Physician account with the AMA in order to access all learning activities on the AMA Ed Hub
Buy this activity
Close
With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Education Center Collection Sign In Modal Right
Close

Name Your Search

Save Search
With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Close
Close

Lookup An Activity

or

My Saved Searches

You currently have no searches saved.

Close

My Saved Courses

You currently have no courses saved.

Close