[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]

Adolescents’ Substance Use and Physical Activity Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Educational Objective
To identify the key insights or developments described in this article
1 Credit CME
Key Points

Question  How have adolescents’ substance use and physical activity behaviors changed under stay-at-home orders related to the COVID-19 pandemic?

Findings  In this cohort study of adolescents in Northern California, the overall prevalence of e-cigarette, cannabis, or alcohol use did not meaningfully change with a statewide stay-at-home order, but physical activity declined considerably.

Meaning  While youth substance use prevention and cessation support should continue, enhanced efforts to increase physical activity are needed.

Abstract

Importance  Stay-at-home policies related to the COVID-19 pandemic could disrupt adolescents’ substance use and physical activity.

Objective  To compare adolescents’ substance use and physical activity behaviors before and after stay-at-home restrictions.

Design, Setting, and Participants  Ongoing prospective cohort study of tobacco use behaviors among ninth- and tenth-grade students enrolled at 8 public high schools in Northern California from March 2019 to February 2020 and followed up from September 2019 to September 2020. Race/ethnicity was self-classified from investigator-provided categories and collected owing to racial/ethnic differences in tobacco and substance use.

Exposures  In California, a COVID-19 statewide stay-at-home order was imposed March 19, 2020. In this study, 521 six-month follow-up responses were completed before the order and 485 were completed after the order.

Main Outcomes and Measures  The prevalence of substance use (ie, past 30-day use of e-cigarettes, other tobacco, cannabis, and alcohol) and physical activity (active ≥5 days/week) was compared at baseline and follow-up. A difference-in-difference approach was used to assess whether changes from baseline to 6-month follow-up varied if follow-up occurred after the stay-at-home order, adjusting for baseline behaviors and characteristics. All models were weighted for losses to follow-up using the inverse probability method. Weights were derived from a logistic regression model for having a follow-up response (dependent variable), as predicted by baseline characteristics and behaviors.

Results  Of 1423 adolescents enrolled at baseline, 1006 completed 6-month follow-up (623 [62%] were female, and 492 [49%] were non-Hispanic White). e-Cigarette use declined from baseline to 6-month follow-up completed before the stay-at-home order (17.3% [89 of 515] to 11.3% [58 of 515]; McNemar χ2 = 13.54; exact P < .001) and 6-month follow-up completed after the stay-at-home order (19.9% [96 of 482] to 10.8% [52 of 482]; McNemar χ2 = 26.16; exact P < .001), but the extent of decline did not differ statistically between groups responding before vs after the stay-at-home order (difference-in-difference adjusted odds ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.47-1.52; P = .58). In contrast, being physically active was unchanged from baseline if follow-up was before the order (53.7% [279 of 520] to 52.9% [275 of 520]; McNemar χ2 = 0.09; exact P = .82) but declined sharply from baseline if follow-up was after the order (54.0% [261 of 483] to 38.1% [184 of 483]; McNemar χ2 = 30.72; exact P < .001), indicating a pronounced difference in change from baseline after the stay-at-home order (difference-in-difference adjusted odds ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.35-0.69; P < .001). Overall in the cohort, reported use of other tobacco, cannabis, and alcohol did not differ meaningfully before and after the order.

Conclusions and Relevance  In this cohort, a reduction in e-cigarette use occurred independently of COVID-19 stay-at-home restrictions, but persistent cannabis and alcohol use suggest continued need for youth substance use prevention and cessation support. Declining physical activity during the pandemic is a health concern.

Sign in to take quiz and track your certificates

Buy This Activity

JN Learning™ is the home for CME and MOC from the JAMA Network. Search by specialty or US state and earn AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ from articles, audio, Clinical Challenges and more. Learn more about CME/MOC

CME Disclosure Statement: Unless noted, all individuals in control of content reported no relevant financial relationships. If applicable, all relevant financial relationships have been mitigated.

Article Information

Corresponding Author: Benjamin W. Chaffee, DDS, MPH, PhD, University of California, San Francisco, 3333 California St, Ste 495, San Francisco, CA 94118 (benjamin.chaffee@ucsf.edu).

Accepted for Publication: February 3, 2021.

Published Online: May 3, 2021. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.0541

Author Contributions: Dr Chaffee had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Concept and design: Chaffee, Couch, Hoeft, Halpern-Felsher.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Chaffee, Cheng, Hoeft.

Drafting of the manuscript: Chaffee, Halpern-Felsher.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.

Statistical analysis: Chaffee, Cheng.

Obtained funding: Chaffee, Halpern-Felsher.

Administrative, technical, or material support: Couch, Halpern-Felsher.

Supervision: Chaffee.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Chaffee reports personal fees from Westat for consulting related to design and data analysis of studies of tobacco and oral health. Dr Halpern-Felsher reports personal fees from e-cigarette litigation outside the submitted work and is an unpaid scientific advisor and expert witness regarding some tobacco-related policies. No other disclosures were reported.

Funding/Support: Support was from the National Institutes of Health (grant U54 HL147127).

Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funder had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Disclaimer: The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funder.

Additional Contributions: We thank Manali V. Vora, BDS, MPH, Divya Persai, BDS, MPH, and Claudia Guerra, MSW, of the University of California, San Francisco, for contributing to data collection. We also thank Janelle Urata, RDH, MS, and Miranda Werts, BA, of the University of California, San Francisco, and David Cash, BA, of Stanford University for contributing to data collection and project management. These individuals made their contributions as part of their roles as paid employees of their institutions at the time of the study.

References
1.
Czeisler  MÉ , Lane  RI , Petrosky  E ,  et al.  Mental health, substance use, and suicidal ideation during the COVID-19 pandemic—United States, June 24-30, 2020.   MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(32):1049-1057. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6932a1PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Landry  BW , Driscoll  SW .  Physical activity in children and adolescents.   PM R. 2012;4(11):826-832. doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.09.585PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Dumas  TM , Ellis  W , Litt  DM .  What does adolescent substance use look like during the COVID-19 pandemic? examining changes in frequency, social contexts, and pandemic-related predictors.   J Adolesc Health. 2020;67(3):354-361. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.06.018PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Gaiha  SM , Lempert  LK , Halpern-Felsher  B .  Underage youth and young adult e-cigarette use and access before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.   JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(12):e2027572. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.27572PubMedGoogle Scholar
5.
Office of Governor Gavin Newsom. Governor Gavin Newsom issues stay at home order. Press release. Published March 19, 2020. Accessed October 12, 2020. https://www.gov.ca.gov/2020/03/19/governor-gavin-newsom-issues-stay-at-home-order/
6.
Chaffee  BW , Couch  ET , Urata  J , Cash  D , Werts  M , Halpern-Felsher  B .  Electronic cigarette and moist snuff product characteristics independently associated with youth tobacco product perceptions.   Tob Induc Dis. 2020;18:71. doi:10.18332/tid/125513PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Hewitt  M . Defining “rural” areas: impact on health care policy and research. Health Program, Office of Technology Assessment, Congress of the United States; 1989.
8.
US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: NHANES 2011-2012. Accessed March 26, 2021. https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/continuousnhanes/default.aspx?BeginYear=2011
9.
Keyes  KM , Vo  T , Wall  MM ,  et al.  Racial/ethnic differences in use of alcohol, tobacco, and marijuana: is there a cross-over from adolescence to adulthood?   Soc Sci Med. 2015;124:132-141. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.11.035PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Chzhen  Y , Moor  I , Pickett  W , Toczydlowska  E , Stevens  G .  Family Affluence and Inequality in Adolescent Health and Life Satisfaction: Evidence From the HBSC Study 2002-2014. UNICEF Office of Research-Innocenti. Published April 2016. https://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/IWP_2016_10.pdf
11.
Kessler  RC , Andrews  G , Colpe  LJ ,  et al.  Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress.   Psychol Med. 2002;32(6):959-976. doi:10.1017/S0033291702006074PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Stephenson  MT , Hoyle  RH , Palmgreen  P , Slater  MD .  Brief measures of sensation seeking for screening and large-scale surveys.   Drug Alcohol Depend. 2003;72(3):279-286. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2003.08.003PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Dimick  JB , Ryan  AM .  Methods for evaluating changes in health care policy: the difference-in-differences approach.   JAMA. 2014;312(22):2401-2402. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.16153PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
French  B , Stuart  EA .  Study designs and statistical methods for studies of child and adolescent health policies.   JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174(10):925-927. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.3408PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Biddle  SJ , Asare  M .  Physical activity and mental health in children and adolescents: a review of reviews.   Br J Sports Med. 2011;45(11):886-895. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2011-090185PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Armstrong  S , Wong  CA , Perrin  E , Page  S , Sibley  L , Skinner  A .  Association of physical activity with income, race/ethnicity, and sex among adolescents and young adults in the United States: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2007-2016.   JAMA Pediatr. 2018;172(8):732-740. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.1273PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Levin  R. Shut down your computers, kids, and lace up. New York Times. Published November 28, 2020. Accessed December 1, 2020. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/28/at-home/exercise-for-kids.html
18.
Perrine  CG , Pickens  CM , Boehmer  TK ,  et al; Lung Injury Response Epidemiology/Surveillance Group.  Characteristics of a multistate outbreak of lung injury associated with e-cigarette use, or vaping: United States, 2019.   MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019;68(39):860-864. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6839e1PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Dave  D , Dench  D , Kenkel  D , Mathios  A , Wang  H .  News that takes your breath away: risk perceptions during an outbreak of vaping-related lung injuries.   J Risk Uncertain. 2020;60(3):281-307. doi:10.1007/s11166-020-09329-2Google ScholarCrossref
20.
Tattan-Birch  H , Brown  J , Shahab  L , Jackson  SE .  Association of the US outbreak of vaping-associated lung injury with perceived harm of e-cigarettes compared with cigarettes.   JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(6):e206981. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.6981PubMedGoogle Scholar
21.
California Department of Public Health. New public education campaign targets deadly outbreak of vaping-related illness. Press release. Published October 24, 2019. Accessed October 12, 2020. https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/OPA/Pages/NR19-028.aspx
22.
Wang  TW , Neff  LJ , Park-Lee  E , Ren  C , Cullen  KA , King  BA .  E-cigarette use among middle and high school students: United States, 2020.   MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(37):1310-1312. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6937e1PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
Oosterhoff  B , Palmer  CA , Wilson  J , Shook  N .  Adolescents’ motivations to engage in social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic: associations with mental and social health.   J Adolesc Health. 2020;67(2):179-185. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.05.004PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Gaiha  SM , Cheng  J , Halpern-Felsher  B .  Association between youth smoking, electronic cigarette use, and COVID-19.   J Adolesc Health. 2020;67(4):519-523. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.07.002PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
UCLA Center for Health Policy Research. 2020 California health interview survey preliminary COVID-19 estimates provided by the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research. Published May 2020. Accessed September 29, 2020. https://healthpolicy.ucla.edu/health-profiles/Pages/COVID-19-Preliminary-Estimates.aspx
26.
Gentzke  AS , Creamer  M , Cullen  KA ,  et al.  Vital Signs: Tobacco product use among middle and high school students: United States, 2011-2018.   MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019;68(6):157-164. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6806e1PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Zhu  S-H , Zhuang  Y-L , Braden  K ,  et al. Results of the statewide 2017-18 California Student Tobacco Survey. Accessed October 12, 2020. https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CCDPHP/DCDIC/CTCB/CDPH%20Document%20Library/ResearchandEvaluation/Reports/2017-18CaliforniaStudentTobaccoSurveyBiennialReport.pdf
AMA CME Accreditation Information

Credit Designation Statement: The American Medical Association designates this Journal-based CME activity activity for a maximum of 1.00  AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

Successful completion of this CME activity, which includes participation in the evaluation component, enables the participant to earn up to:

  • 1.00 Medical Knowledge MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine's (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program;;
  • 1.00 Self-Assessment points in the American Board of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery’s (ABOHNS) Continuing Certification program;
  • 1.00 MOC points in the American Board of Pediatrics’ (ABP) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program;
  • 1.00 Lifelong Learning points in the American Board of Pathology’s (ABPath) Continuing Certification program; and
  • 1.00 CME points in the American Board of Surgery’s (ABS) Continuing Certification program

It is the CME activity provider's responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting MOC credit.

Close
Want full access to the AMA Ed Hub?
After you sign up for AMA Membership, make sure you sign in or create a Physician account with the AMA in order to access all learning activities on the AMA Ed Hub
Buy this activity
Close
Want full access to the AMA Ed Hub?
After you sign up for AMA Membership, make sure you sign in or create a Physician account with the AMA in order to access all learning activities on the AMA Ed Hub
Buy this activity
Close
With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Education Center Collection Sign In Modal Right
Close

Name Your Search

Save Search
With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Close
Close

Lookup An Activity

or

My Saved Searches

You currently have no searches saved.

Close

My Saved Courses

You currently have no courses saved.

Close