Behavioral Therapy vs Supportive Therapy for Youths With Social Anxiety Disorder | Anxiety Disorders | JN Learning | AMA Ed Hub [Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]

Therapist-Guided Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy vs Internet-Delivered Supportive Therapy for Children and Adolescents With Social Anxiety DisorderA Randomized Clinical Trial

Educational Objective
To assess the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of therapist-guided internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT) for social anxiety disorder (SAD) in youths vs an active comparator, internet-delivered supportive therapy (ISUPPORT).
1 Credit CME
Key Points

Question  Is internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT) an efficacious and cost-effective treatment for youths with social anxiety disorder (SAD)?

Findings  In this randomized clinical trial of 103 children and adolescents with a principal diagnosis of SAD and their parents, a 10-week course of ICBT was efficacious and cost-effective compared with an active comparator.

Meaning  Internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy has the potential to overcome common treatment barriers and increase the availability of evidence-based psychological treatments for young people with SAD; policy makers could consider ICBT with minimal therapist support a promising, low-intensity treatment for children and adolescents with SAD.

Abstract

Importance  Social anxiety disorder (SAD) is a prevalent childhood-onset disorder associated with lifelong adversity and high costs for the individual and society at large. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an established evidence-based treatment for SAD, but its availability is limited.

Objective  To assess the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of therapist-guided internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT) for SAD in youths vs an active comparator, internet-delivered supportive therapy (ISUPPORT).

Design, Setting, and Participants  This single-masked, superiority randomized clinical trial enrolled participants at a clinical research unit integrated within the child and adolescent mental health services in Stockholm, Sweden, from September 1, 2017, to October 31, 2018. The final participant reached the 3-month follow-up (primary end point) in May 2019. Children and adolescents 10 to 17 years of age with a principal diagnosis of SAD and their parents were included in the study.

Interventions  ICBT and ISUPPORT, both including 10 online modules, 5 separate parental modules, and 3 video call sessions with a therapist.

Main Outcomes and Measures  The Clinician Severity Rating (CSR), derived from the Anxiety Disorder Interview Schedule, rated by masked assessors 3 months after the end of treatment. The CSR ranges from 0 to 8, with scores of 4 or higher indicating caseness. Secondary outcomes included masked assessor–rated diagnostic status of SAD and global functioning, child- and parent-reported social anxiety and depressive symptoms, and health-related costs.

Results  Of the 307 youths assessed for eligibility, 103 were randomized to 10 weeks of therapist-guided ICBT (n = 51) or therapist-guided ISUPPORT (n = 52) for SAD. The sample consisted of 103 youths (mean [SD] age, 14.1 [2.1] years; 79 [77%] female). Internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy was significantly more efficacious than ISUPPORT in reducing the severity of SAD symptoms. Mean (SD) CSR scores for ICBT at baseline and at the 3-month follow-up were 5.06 (0.95) and 3.96 (1.46), respectively, compared with 4.94 (0.94) and 4.48 (1.30) for ISUPPORT. There was a significant between-group effect size of d = 0.67 (95% CI, 0.21-1.12) at the 3-month follow-up. Similarly, all of the secondary outcome measures demonstrated significant differences with small to large effect sizes, except for child-rated quality of life (nonsignificant). The cost-effectiveness analyses indicated cost savings associated with ICBT compared with ISUPPORT, with the main drivers of the savings being lower medication costs (z = 2.38, P = .02) and increased school productivity (z = 1.99, P = .047) in the ICBT group. There was 1 suicide attempt in the ISUPPORT group; no other serious adverse events occurred in either group.

Conclusions and Relevance  In this randomized clinical trial, internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy was an efficacious and cost-effective intervention for children and adolescents with SAD. Implementation in clinical practice could markedly increase the availability of effective interventions for SAD.

Trial Registration  ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03247075

Sign in to take quiz and track your certificates

Buy This Activity

JN Learning™ is the home for CME and MOC from the JAMA Network. Search by specialty or US state and earn AMA PRA Category 1 CME Credit™ from articles, audio, Clinical Challenges and more. Learn more about CME/MOC

CME Disclosure Statement: Unless noted, all individuals in control of content reported no relevant financial relationships. If applicable, all relevant financial relationships have been mitigated.

Article Information

Accepted for Publication: February 22, 2021.

Published Online: May 12, 2021. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.0469

Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2021 Nordh M et al. JAMA Psychiatry.

Corresponding Author: Martina Nordh, PhD, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, CAP Research Centre, Gävlegatan 22, SE-113 30, Stockholm, Sweden (martina.nord@ki.se).

Author Contributions: Drs Högström and Serlachius contributed equally to this work and share last authorship. Drs Nordh and Serlachius had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Concept and design: Nordh, Salomonsson, Lenhard, Mataix-Cols, Högström, Serlachius.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Nordh, Wahlund, Jolstedt, Sahlin, Bjureberg, Ahlen, Lalouni, Vigerland, Lavner, Öst, Lenhard, Hesser, Mataix-Cols, Högström, Serlachius.

Drafting of the manuscript: Nordh, Jolstedt, Lenhard, Hesser, Högström.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.

Statistical analysis: Nordh, Lenhard, Hesser.

Obtained funding: Vigerland, Mataix-Cols, Serlachius.

Administrative, technical, or material support: Nordh, Wahlund, Jolstedt, Sahlin, Bjureberg, Ahlen, Lalouni, Salomonsson, Vigerland, Lavner, Högström, Serlachius.

Supervision: Nordh, Öst, Mataix-Cols, Högström, Serlachius.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Mataix-Cols reported receiving personal fees from UpToDate, Wolters Kluwer Health, and Elsevier outside the submitted work. Dr Serlachius reported receiving grants from the Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life, and Welfare and Region Stockholm during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.

Funding/Support: This work was funded by grant Forte 2014-4052 from the Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life, and Welfare and grant HNSV 14099 from Region Stockholm. Dr Högström was supported by grant K0173-2016 from Region Stockholm (clinical postdoctoral appointment: 2017-2020). Dr Serlachius was supported by Region Stockholm (clinical research appointment: 2017-0605).

Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funding sources had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Data Sharing Statement: See Supplement 3.

Additional Contributions: Karin Sundström, MSc, and Viktor Eriksson, MSc, provided invaluable clinical work, Mathilde Annerstedt, MSc, assisted with participant assessments, and Malin Burman, BSc, provided administrative support. All were compensated with salaries funded by grant 2014-4052 from the Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life, and Welfare and grant HNSV 14099 from Region Stockholm. We thank all participating families and Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services practitioners who made the study possible.

References
1.
Stein  DJ , Lim  CCW , Roest  AM ,  et al; WHO World Mental Health Survey Collaborators.  The cross-national epidemiology of social anxiety disorder: data from the World Mental Health Survey Initiative.   BMC Med. 2017;15(1):143. doi:10.1186/s12916-017-0889-2 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Patel  A , Knapp  M , Henderson  J , Baldwin  D .  The economic consequences of social phobia.   J Affect Disord. 2002;68(2-3):221-233. doi:10.1016/S0165-0327(00)00323-2 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Scaini  S , Belotti  R , Ogliari  A , Battaglia  M .  A comprehensive meta-analysis of cognitive-behavioral interventions for social anxiety disorder in children and adolescents.   J Anxiety Disord. 2016;42:105-112. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.05.008 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Pilling  S , Mayo-Wilson  E , Mavranezouli  I , Kew  K , Taylor  C , Clark  DM ; Guideline Development Group.  Recognition, assessment and treatment of social anxiety disorder: summary of NICE guidance.   BMJ. 2013;346:f2541. doi:10.1136/bmj.f2541 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Burstein  M , He  JP , Kattan  G , Albano  AM , Avenevoli  S , Merikangas  KR .  Social phobia and subtypes in the National Comorbidity Survey-Adolescent Supplement: prevalence, correlates, and comorbidity.   J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2011;50(9):870-880. doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2011.06.005 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Merikangas  KR , He  JP , Burstein  M ,  et al.  Service utilization for lifetime mental disorders in U.S. adolescents: results of the National Comorbidity Survey-Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A).   J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2011;50(1):32-45. doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2010.10.006 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Dalrymple  KL , Zimmerman  M .  Treatment-seeking for social anxiety disorder in a general outpatient psychiatry setting.   Psychiatry Res. 2011;187(3):375-381. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2011.01.004 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Holmes  EA , Ghaderi  A , Harmer  CJ ,  et al.  The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on psychological treatments research in tomorrow’s science.   Lancet Psychiatry. 2018;5(3):237-286. doi:10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30513-8 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Podina  IR , Podina  IR , Mogoase  C ,  et al.  A meta-analysis on the efficacy of technology mediated CBT for anxious children and adolescents.   J Ration Emot Cogn Behav Ther. 2016;34(1):31-50. doi:10.1007/s10942-015-0228-5 Google ScholarCrossref
10.
Rooksby  M , Elouafkaoui  P , Humphris  G , Clarkson  J , Freeman  R .  Internet-assisted delivery of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for childhood anxiety: systematic review and meta-analysis.   J Anxiety Disord. 2015;29:83-92. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2014.11.006 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Kampmann  IL , Emmelkamp  PM , Morina  N .  Meta-analysis of technology-assisted interventions for social anxiety disorder.   J Anxiety Disord. 2016;42:71-84. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.06.007 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Spence  SH , Donovan  CL , March  S , Kenardy  JA , Hearn  CS .  Generic versus disorder specific cognitive behavior therapy for social anxiety disorder in youth: a randomized controlled trial using internet delivery.   Behav Res Ther. 2017;90:41-57. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2016.12.003 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Chambless  DL , Hollon  SD .  Defining empirically supported therapies.   J Consult Clin Psychol. 1998;66(1):7-18. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.66.1.7 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Jolstedt  M , Wahlund  T , Lenhard  F ,  et al.  Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of therapist-guided internet cognitive behavioural therapy for paediatric anxiety disorders: a single-centre, single-blind, randomised controlled trial.   Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2018;2(11):792-801. doi:10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30275-X PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Lenhard  F , Andersson  E , Mataix-Cols  D ,  et al.  Therapist-guided, internet-delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy for adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder: a randomized controlled trial.   J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017;56(1):10-19.e2. doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2016.09.515 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
American Psychiatric Association.  Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed. American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013.
17.
Silverman  WK , Albano  AM .  Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule: ADIS-IV Child Interview Schedule. Vol 2. Graywind Publications; 1996.
18.
Nordh  M , Vigerland  S , Öst  L-G ,  et al.  Therapist-guided internet-delivered cognitive-behavioural therapy supplemented with group exposure sessions for adolescents with social anxiety disorder: a feasibility trial.   BMJ Open. 2017;7(12):e018345. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018345 PubMedGoogle Scholar
19.
Faul  F , Erdfelder  E , Lang  AG , Buchner  A .  G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.   Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175-191. doi:10.3758/BF03193146 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Hudson  JL , Rapee  RM , Lyneham  HJ , McLellan  LF , Wuthrich  VM , Schniering  CA .  Comparing outcomes for children with different anxiety disorders following cognitive behavioural therapy.   Behav Res Ther. 2015;72:30-37. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2015.06.007 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Hedeker  D , Gibbons  RD .  Longitudinal Data Analysis. Vol 451. John Wiley & Sons; 2006.
22.
Bouwmans C, Jong KD, Timman R, et al. Feasibility, reliability and validity of a questionnaire on healthcare consumption and productivity loss in patients with a psychiatric disorder (TiC-P). BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:217. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-13-217
23.
Assessing the performance of a new generic measure of health-related quality of life for children and refining it for use in health state valuation. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2011;9(3):157-169. doi:10.2165/11587350-000000000-00000
24.
Herbert  JD , Gaudiano  BA , Rheingold  AA ,  et al.  Cognitive behavior therapy for generalized social anxiety disorder in adolescents: a randomized controlled trial.   J Anxiety Disord. 2009;23(2):167-177. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2008.06.004 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Masia-Warner  C , Klein  RG , Dent  HC ,  et al.  School-based intervention for adolescents with social anxiety disorder: results of a controlled study.   J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2005;33(6):707-722. doi:10.1007/s10802-005-7649-z PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Beidel  DC , Turner  SM , Sallee  FR , Ammerman  RT , Crosby  LA , Pathak  S .  SET-C versus fluoxetine in the treatment of childhood social phobia.   J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2007;46(12):1622-1632. doi:10.1097/chi.0b013e318154bb57 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Spence  SH , Donovan  C , Brechman-Toussaint  M .  The treatment of childhood social phobia: the effectiveness of a social skills training-based, cognitive-behavioural intervention, with and without parental involvement.   J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2000;41(6):713-726. doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00659 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Olivares  J , García-López  LJ , Beidel  DC , Turner  SM , Albano  AM , Hidalgo  MD .  Results at long-term among three psychological treatments for adolescents with generalized social phobia (I): statistical significance.   Psicología Conductual. 2002;10(1):147-166.Google Scholar
29.
Hedman  E , Andersson  G , Ljótsson  B ,  et al.  Internet-based cognitive behavior therapy vs. cognitive behavioral group therapy for social anxiety disorder: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.   PLoS One. 2011;6(3):e18001. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018001 PubMedGoogle Scholar
30.
Öst  LG , Cederlund  R , Reuterskiöld  L .  Behavioral treatment of social phobia in youth: does parent education training improve the outcome?   Behav Res Ther. 2015;67:19-29. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2015.02.001 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
31.
Pennant  ME , Loucas  CE , Whittington  C ,  et al; Expert Advisory Group.  Computerised therapies for anxiety and depression in children and young people: a systematic review and meta-analysis.   Behav Res Ther. 2015;67:1-18. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2015.01.009 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
If you are not a JN Learning subscriber, you can either:
Subscribe to JN Learning for one year
Buy this activity
jn-learning_Modal_Multimedia_LoginSubscribe_Purchase
Close
If you are not a JN Learning subscriber, you can either:
Subscribe to JN Learning for one year
Buy this activity
jn-learning_Modal_Multimedia_LoginSubscribe_Purchase
Close
With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Education Center Collection Sign In Modal Right
Close

Name Your Search

Save Search
Close
With a personal account, you can:
  • Track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
jn-learning_Modal_SaveSearch_NoAccess_Purchase
Close

Lookup An Activity

or

Close

My Saved Searches

You currently have no searches saved.

Close

My Saved Courses

You currently have no courses saved.

Close
With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Education Center Collection Sign In Modal Right
Close