Association of CABG vs PCI With Memory Decline in Older Adults Undergoing Coronary Revascularization | Cardiology | JN Learning | AMA Ed Hub [Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]

Association of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting vs Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Memory Decline in Older Adults Undergoing Coronary Revascularization

Educational Objective
To understand the association of memory decline and coronary revascularization.
1 Credit CME
Key Points

Question  Among older adults undergoing coronary revascularization, is the type of procedure (coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG] or percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]) associated with differences in memory decline over time?

Findings  In this retrospective cohort study of 1680 US older adults, the change in the rate of memory decline from pre- to postprocedure was not significantly different for those undergoing CABG vs PCI.

Meaning  There was no significant difference in the change in the rate of memory decline after CABG compared with PCI in a cohort of older adults.

Abstract

Importance  It is uncertain whether coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is associated with cognitive decline in older adults compared with a nonsurgical method of coronary revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]).

Objective  To compare the change in the rate of memory decline after CABG vs PCI.

Design, Setting, and Participants  Retrospective cohort study of community-dwelling participants in the Health and Retirement Study, who underwent CABG or PCI between 1998 and 2015 at age 65 years or older. Data were modeled for up to 5 years preceding and 10 years following revascularization or until death, drop out, or the 2016-2017 interview wave. The date of final follow-up was November 2017.

Exposures  CABG (including on and off pump) or PCI, ascertained from Medicare fee-for-service billing records.

Main Outcomes and Measures  The primary outcome was a summary measure of cognitive test scores and proxy cognition reports that were performed biennially in the Health and Retirement Study, referred to as memory score, normalized as a z score (ie, mean of 0, SD of 1 in a reference population of adults aged ≥72 years). Memory score was analyzed using multivariable linear mixed-effects models, with a prespecified subgroup analysis of on-pump and off-pump CABG. The minimum clinically important difference was a change of 1 SD of the population-level rate of memory decline (0.048 memory units/y).

Results  Of 1680 participants (mean age at procedure, 75 years; 41% female), 665 underwent CABG (168 off pump) and 1015 underwent PCI. In the PCI group, the mean rate of memory decline was 0.064 memory units/y (95% CI, 0.052 to 0.078) before the procedure and 0.060 memory units/y (95% CI, 0.048 to 0.071) after the procedure (within-group change, 0.004 memory units/y [95% CI, −0.010 to 0.018]). In the CABG group, the mean rate of memory decline was 0.049 memory units/y (95% CI, 0.033 to 0.065) before the procedure and 0.059 memory units/y (95% CI, 0.047 to 0.072) after the procedure (within-group change, −0.011 memory units/y [95% CI, −0.029 to 0.008]). The between-group difference-in-differences estimate for memory decline for PCI vs CABG was 0.015 memory units/y (95% CI, −0.008 to 0.038; P = .21). There was statistically significant increase in the rate of memory decline after off-pump CABG compared with after PCI (difference-in-differences: mean increase in the rate of decline of 0.046 memory units/y [95% CI, 0.008 to 0.084] after off-pump CABG), but not after on-pump CABG compared with PCI (difference-in-differences: mean slowing of decline of 0.003 memory units/y [95% CI, −0.024 to 0.031] after on-pump CABG).

Conclusions and Relevance  Among older adults undergoing coronary revascularization with CABG or PCI, the type of revascularization procedure was not significantly associated with differences in the change of rate of memory decline.

Sign in to take quiz and track your certificates

Buy This Activity

JN Learning™ is the home for CME and MOC from the JAMA Network. Search by specialty or US state and earn AMA PRA Category 1 CME Credit™ from articles, audio, Clinical Challenges and more. Learn more about CME/MOC

Article Information

Corresponding Author: Elizabeth L. Whitlock, MD, MSc, Department of Anesthesia & Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, Box 0648, 521 Parnassus Ave, Floor 04, San Francisco, CA 94143 (elizabeth.whitlock@ucsf.edu).

Accepted for Publication: March 19, 2021.

Author Contributions: Dr Whitlock and Ms Diaz-Ramirez had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Concept and design: Whitlock, Covinsky, Avidan, Glymour.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Whitlock, Diaz-Ramirez, Smith, Boscardin, Glymour.

Drafting of the manuscript: Whitlock.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.

Statistical analysis: Whitlock, Diaz-Ramirez, Boscardin, Glymour.

Obtained funding: Whitlock.

Supervision: Smith, Avidan.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Whitlock reported receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (National Institute on Aging [NIA]). Ms Diaz-Ramirez reported receiving grants from the NIH (NIA). Dr Smith reported receiving grants from the NIH (NIA) and the National Palliative Care Research Center. Dr Boscardin reported receiving grants from NIH (NIA, National Institute of Mental Health [NIMH], National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences), the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, and the Centers for Disease Control Foundation. Dr Covinsky reported receiving grants from the NIH (NIA). Dr Avidan reported receiving grants from the NIH (National Institute of Nursing Research, NIMH, NIA, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Heart, Lung, Blood, and Institute), the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the COVID-19 Therapeutics Accelerator. Dr Glymour reported receiving grants from the NIH (NIA, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism) and the Robert Wood Johnson Evidence for Action Program.

Funding/Support: Funding was provided by the National Institute on Aging (grant P30AG044281 to Drs Whitlock, Smith, Boscardin, and Covinsky and Ms Diaz-Ramirez; grant R03AG059822 to Dr Whitlock and Ms Diaz-Ramirez; and grants R01AG057751 and K24AG068312 to Dr Smith) and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (grant KL2TR001879 to Dr Whitlock and Ms Diaz-Ramirez), both of the National Institutes of Health, and the Foundation for Anesthesia Education and Research (to Dr Whitlock).

Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

References
1.
Newman  MF , Kirchner  JL , Phillips-Bute  B ,  et al; Neurological Outcome Research Group and the Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology Research Endeavors Investigators.  Longitudinal assessment of neurocognitive function after coronary-artery bypass surgery.   N Engl J Med. 2001;344(6):395-402. doi:10.1056/NEJM200102083440601PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Branthwaite  MA .  Neurological damage related to open-heart surgery: a clinical survey.   Thorax. 1972;27(6):748-753. doi:10.1136/thx.27.6.748PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Sotaniemi  KA .  Brain damage and neurological outcome after open-heart surgery.   J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1980;43(2):127-135. doi:10.1136/jnnp.43.2.127PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Diegeler  A , Hirsch  R , Schneider  F ,  et al.  Neuromonitoring and neurocognitive outcome in off-pump versus conventional coronary bypass operation.   Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69(4):1162-1166. doi:10.1016/S0003-4975(99)01574-XPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Van Dijk  D , Jansen  EW , Hijman  R ,  et al; Octopus Study Group.  Cognitive outcome after off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomized trial.   JAMA. 2002;287(11):1405-1412. doi:10.1001/jama.287.11.1405PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Lamy  A , Devereaux  PJ , Prabhakaran  D ,  et al; CORONARY Investigators.  Effects of off-pump and on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting at 1 year.   N Engl J Med. 2013;368(13):1179-1188. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1301228PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Shroyer  AL , Grover  FL , Hattler  B ,  et al; Veterans Affairs Randomized On/Off Bypass (ROOBY) Study Group.  On-pump versus off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery.   N Engl J Med. 2009;361(19):1827-1837. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0902905PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
van Dijk  D , Spoor  M , Hijman  R ,  et al; Octopus Study Group.  Cognitive and cardiac outcomes 5 years after off-pump vs on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery.   JAMA. 2007;297(7):701-708. doi:10.1001/jama.297.7.701PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Sonnega  A , Faul  JD , Ofstedal  MB , Langa  KM , Phillips  JW , Weir  DR .  Cohort profile: the Health and Retirement Study (HRS).   Int J Epidemiol. 2014;43(2):576-585. doi:10.1093/ije/dyu067PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Benedetto  U , Angelini  GD , Caputo  M ,  et al.  Off- vs on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery on hospital outcomes in 134,117 octogenarians.   J Thorac Dis. 2017;9(12):5085-5092. doi:10.21037/jtd.2017.11.10PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Langa  KM , Plassman  BL , Wallace  RB ,  et al.  The Aging, Demographics, and Memory Study: study design and methods.   Neuroepidemiology. 2005;25(4):181-191. doi:10.1159/000087448PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Wu  Q , Tchetgen  EJ , Osypuk  TL , White  K , Mujahid  M , Maria Glymour  M .  Combining direct and proxy assessments to reduce attrition bias in a longitudinal study.   Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2013;27(3):207-212. doi:10.1097/WAD.0b013e31826cfe90PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Marden  JR , Mayeda  ER , Tchetgen Tchetgen  EJ , Kawachi  I , Glymour  MM .  High hemoglobin A1c and diabetes predict memory decline in the Health and Retirement Study.   Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2017;31(1):48-54. doi:10.1097/WAD.0000000000000182PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Wang  Q , Mejía-Guevara  I , Rist  PM , Walter  S , Capistrant  BD , Glymour  MM .  Changes in memory before and after stroke differ by age and sex, but not by race.   Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014;37(4):235-243. doi:10.1159/000357557PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Marden  JR , Mayeda  ER , Walter  S ,  et al.  Using an Alzheimer disease polygenic risk score to predict memory decline in Black and White Americans over 14 years of follow-up.   Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2016;30(3):195-202. doi:10.1097/WAD.0000000000000137PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Vable  AM , Eng  CW , Mayeda  ER ,  et al.  Mother’s education and late-life disparities in memory and dementia risk among US military veterans and non-veterans.   J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018;72(12):1162-1167. doi:10.1136/jech-2018-210771PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Whitlock  EL , Diaz-Ramirez  LG , Glymour  MM , Boscardin  WJ , Covinsky  KE , Smith  AK .  Association between persistent pain and memory decline and dementia in a longitudinal cohort of elders.   JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(8):1146-1153. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1622PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Singh-Manoux  A , Kivimäki  M .  The importance of cognitive aging for understanding dementia.   Age (Dordr). 2010;32(4):509-512. doi:10.1007/s11357-010-9147-7PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Gianattasio  KZ , Ciarleglio  A , Power  MC .  Development of Algorithmic dementia ascertainment for racial/ethnic disparities research in the US Health and Retirement Study.   Epidemiology. 2020;31(1):126-133. doi:10.1097/EDE.0000000000001101PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Evered  L , Silbert  B , Knopman  DS ,  et al; Nomenclature Consensus Working Group.  Recommendations for the nomenclature of cognitive change associated with anaesthesia and surgery-2018.   Br J Anaesth. 2018;121(5):1005-1012. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2017.11.087PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Weintraub  WS , Grau-Sepulveda  MV , Weiss  JM ,  et al.  Comparative effectiveness of revascularization strategies.   N Engl J Med. 2012;366(16):1467-1476. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1110717PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Cigolle  CT , Ofstedal  MB , Tian  Z , Blaum  CS .  Comparing models of frailty: the Health and Retirement Study.   J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57(5):830-839. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02225.xPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
Whitlock  EL , Diaz-Ramirez  LG , Smith  AK , Boscardin  WJ , Avidan  MS , Glymour  MM .  Cognitive change after cardiac surgery versus cardiac catheterization: a population-based study.   Ann Thorac Surg. 2019;107(4):1119-1125. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.10.021PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Package ‘logitnorm’: Functions for the Logitnormal Distribution. Version 0.8.372018. The R Project.
25.
Kuźma  E , Airdrie  J , Littlejohns  TJ ,  et al.  Coronary artery bypass graft surgery and dementia risk in the Cardiovascular Health Study.   Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2017;31(2):120-127. doi:10.1097/WAD.0000000000000191PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Evered  LA , Silbert  BS , Scott  DA , Maruff  P , Ames  D .  Prevalence of dementia 7.5 years after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.   Anesthesiology. 2016;125(1):62-71. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000001143PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Diegeler  A , Börgermann  J , Kappert  U ,  et al.  Five-year outcome after off-pump or on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in elderly patients.   Circulation. 2019;139(16):1865-1871. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035857PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Shroyer  AL , Hattler  B , Wagner  TH ,  et al; Veterans Affairs ROOBY-FS Group.  Five-year outcomes after on-pump and off-pump coronary-artery bypass.   N Engl J Med. 2017;377(7):623-632. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1614341PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Nadelson  MR , Sanders  RD , Avidan  MS .  Perioperative cognitive trajectory in adults.   Br J Anaesth. 2014;112(3):440-451. doi:10.1093/bja/aet420PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Krause  BM , Sabia  S , Manning  HJ , Singh-Manoux  A , Sanders  RD .  Association between major surgical admissions and the cognitive trajectory: 19 year follow-up of Whitehall II cohort study.   BMJ. 2019;366:l4466. doi:10.1136/bmj.l4466PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
31.
Selnes  OA , Grega  MA , Bailey  MM ,  et al.  Do management strategies for coronary artery disease influence 6-year cognitive outcomes?   Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88(2):445-454. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.04.061PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Evered  L , Scott  DA , Silbert  B , Maruff  P .  Postoperative cognitive dysfunction is independent of type of surgery and anesthetic.   Anesth Analg. 2011;112(5):1179-1185. doi:10.1213/ANE.0b013e318215217ePubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
33.
Figueroa  JF , Blumenthal  DM , Feyman  Y ,  et al.  Differences in management of coronary artery disease in patients with Medicare advantage vs traditional fee-for-service Medicare among cardiology practices.   JAMA Cardiol. 2019;4(3):265-271. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2019.0007PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
34.
Matlock  DD , Groeneveld  PW , Sidney  S ,  et al.  Geographic variation in cardiovascular procedure use among Medicare fee-for-service vs Medicare Advantage beneficiaries.   JAMA. 2013;310(2):155-162. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.7837PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
If you are not a JN Learning subscriber, you can either:
Subscribe to JN Learning for one year
Buy this activity
jn-learning_Modal_Multimedia_LoginSubscribe_Purchase
Close
If you are not a JN Learning subscriber, you can either:
Subscribe to JN Learning for one year
Buy this activity
jn-learning_Modal_Multimedia_LoginSubscribe_Purchase
Close
With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Education Center Collection Sign In Modal Right
Close

Name Your Search

Save Search
Close
With a personal account, you can:
  • Track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
jn-learning_Modal_SaveSearch_NoAccess_Purchase
Close

Lookup An Activity

or

Close

My Saved Searches

You currently have no searches saved.

Close
With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Education Center Collection Sign In Modal Right
Close