Voucher-Based Kidney Donation and Redemption for Future Transplant | Nephrology | JN Learning | AMA Ed Hub [Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]

Voucher-Based Kidney Donation and Redemption for Future Transplant

Educational Objective
(1) To identify the extent to which the use of family vouchers for future kidney transplant will help to expand the living donor pool. (2) Are voucher redemptions capable of facilitating timely kidney allografts?
1 Credit CME
Key Points

Question  Does the use of family vouchers for future kidney transplant help to expand the living donor pool, and are voucher redemptions capable of facilitating timely kidney allografts?

Findings  In this cohort study of 250 family voucher–based kidney donations across 79 transplant centers in the US, the use of vouchers precipitated 573 downstream kidney transplants. Although the reasons were multifactorial, the waiting time until transplant among candidate recipients in this kidney exchange registry decreased by 3 months since the inception of family voucher–based donation.

Meaning  These findings suggest that the family voucher program facilitated living kidney donations that may not otherwise have occurred by overcoming chronological incompatibility between donor-recipient pairs.

Abstract

Importance  Policy makers, transplant professionals, and patient organizations agree that there is a need to increase the number of kidney transplants by facilitating living donation. Vouchers for future transplant provide a means of overcoming the chronological incompatibility that occurs when the ideal time for living donation differs from the time at which the intended recipient actually needs a transplant. However, uncertainty remains regarding the actual change in the number of living kidney donors associated with voucher programs and the capability of voucher redemptions to produce timely transplants.

Objective  To examine the consequences of voucher-based kidney donation and the capability of voucher redemptions to provide timely kidney allografts.

Design, Setting, and Participants  This multicenter cohort study of 79 transplant centers across the US used data from the National Kidney Registry from January 1, 2014, to January 31, 2021, to identify all family vouchers and patterns in downstream kidney-paired donations. The analysis included living kidney donors and recipients participating in the National Kidney Registry family voucher program.

Exposures  A voucher was provided to the intended recipient at the time of donation. Vouchers had no cash value and could not be sold, bartered, or transferred to another person. When a voucher was redeemed, a living donation chain was used to return a kidney to the voucher holder.

Main Outcomes and Measures  Deidentified demographic and clinical data from each kidney donation were evaluated, including the downstream patterns in kidney-paired donation. Voucher redemptions were separately evaluated and analyzed.

Results  Between 2014 and 2021, 250 family voucher–based donations were facilitated. Each donation precipitated a transplant chain with a mean (SD) length of 2.3 (1.6) downstream kidney transplants, facilitating 573 total transplants. Of those, 111 transplants (19.4%) were performed in highly sensitized recipients. Among 250 voucher donors, the median age was 46 years (range, 19-78 years), and 157 donors (62.8%) were female, 241 (96.4%) were White, and 104 (41.6%) had blood type O. Over a 7-year period, the waiting time for those in the National Kidney Registry exchange pool decreased by more than 3 months. Six vouchers were redeemed, and 3 of those redemptions were among individuals with blood type O. The time from voucher redemption to kidney transplant ranged from 36 to 155 days.

Conclusions and Relevance  In this study, the family voucher program appeared to mitigate a major disincentive to living kidney donation, namely the reluctance to donate a kidney in the present that could be redeemed in the future if needed. The program facilitated kidney donations that may not otherwise have occurred. All 6 of the redeemed vouchers produced timely kidney transplants, indicating the capability of the voucher program.

Sign in to take quiz and track your certificates

Buy This Activity

JN Learning™ is the home for CME and MOC from the JAMA Network. Search by specialty or US state and earn AMA PRA Category 1 CME Credit™ from articles, audio, Clinical Challenges and more. Learn more about CME/MOC

Article Information

Accepted for Publication: March 20, 2021.

Published Online: June 23, 2021. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2021.2375

Corresponding Author: Jeffrey L. Veale, MD, Kidney Transplant Exchange Program, UCLA Health, Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California, Los Angeles, 200 Medical Plaza Dr, Ste 140, Los Angeles, CA 90095 (jveale@mednet.ucla.edu).

Author Contributions: Drs Nassiri and Veale had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Concept and design: Veale, Nassiri, Capron, Danovitch, Cooper, Kapur.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Veale, Nassiri, Gritsch, Cooper, Redfield, Kennealey.

Drafting of the manuscript: Veale, Nassiri, Capron, Cooper, Kennealey.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Veale, Nassiri, Danovitch, Gritsch, Cooper, Redfield, Kennealey, Kapur.

Statistical analysis: Nassiri.

Administrative, technical, or material support: Nassiri, Gritsch, Cooper, Redfield, Kapur.

Supervision: Veale, Nassiri, Capron, Danovitch, Cooper.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Drs Veale, Cooper, Redfield, Kennealey, and Kapur reported serving as members of the medical board of the National Kidney Registry during the conduct of the study.

References
1.
Veale  JL , Capron  AM , Nassiri  N ,  et al.  Vouchers for future kidney transplants to overcome “chronological incompatibility” between living donors and recipients.   Transplantation. 2017;101(9):2115-2119. doi:10.1097/TP.0000000000001744 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Tushla  L , LaPointe Rudow  D , Milton  J , Rodrigue  JR , Schold  JD , Hays  R ; American Society of Transplantation.  Living-donor kidney transplantation: reducing financial barriers to live kidney donation—recommendations from a consensus conference.   Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;10(9):1696-1702. doi:10.2215/CJN.01000115 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
LaPointe Rudow  D , Hays  R , Baliga  P ,  et al.  Consensus conference on best practices in live kidney donation: recommendations to optimize education, access, and care.   Am J Transplant. 2015;15(4):914-922. doi:10.1111/ajt.13173 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Advancing American kidney health. EO No. 13879 of July 10, 2019. Fed Regist. 2019;84(135):33817-33819. Accessed November 8, 2019. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/07/15/2019-15159/advancing-american-kidney-health
5.
McCormick  F , Held  PJ , Chertow  GM , Peters  TG , Roberts  JP .  Removing disincentives to kidney donation: a quantitative analysis.   J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019;30(8):1349-1357. doi:10.1681/ASN.2019030242 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Salomon  DR , Langnas  AN , Reed  AI , Bloom  RD , Magee  JC , Gaston  RS ; AST/ASTS Incentives Workshop Group (IWG).  AST/ASTS workshop on increasing organ donation in the United States: creating an “arc of change” from removing disincentives to testing incentives.   Am J Transplant. 2015;15(5):1173-1179. doi:10.1111/ajt.13233 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Pruett  TL , Chandraker  A .  The White House Organ Summit: what it means for our field.   Am J Transplant. 2016;16(8):2245-2246. doi:10.1111/ajt.13947 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Warren  PH , Gifford  KA , Hong  BA , Merion  RM , Ojo  AO .  Development of the National Living Donor Assistance Center: reducing financial disincentives to living organ donation.   Prog Transplant. 2014;24(1):76-81. doi:10.7182/pit2014593 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Cartwright  M , Beutler  JL . Letter from members of Congress to Health and Human Services secretary urging him to expand the mandate of the National Living Donor Assistance Center. March 8, 2019. Accessed March 20, 2020. https://cartwright.house.gov/sites/cartwright.house.gov/files/letter%20to%20azar.pdf
10.
Health Resources and Services Administration. Trump administration proposes new rules to increase accountability and availability of the organ supply. HRSA eNews, US Department of Health and Human Services. December 19, 2019. Accessed March 14, 2020. https://www.hrsa.gov/enews/past-issues/2019/december-19
11.
National Kidney Registry. Info for centers: medical board policies. 2016. Accessed March 20, 2020. http://www.kidneyregistry.org/transplant_center.php#policies
12.
Davis  CL , Cooper  M .  The state of U.S. living kidney donors.   Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5(10):1873-1880. doi:10.2215/CJN.01510210 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Grams  ME , Sang  Y , Levey  AS ,  et al; Chronic Kidney Disease Prognosis Consortium.  Kidney-failure risk projection for the living kidney-donor candidate.   N Engl J Med. 2016;374(5):411-421. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1510491 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Melcher  ML , Leeser  DB , Gritsch  HA ,  et al.  Chain transplantation: initial experience of a large multicenter program.   Am J Transplant. 2012;12(9):2429-2436. doi:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04156.x PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Nassiri  N , Kwan  L , Pearman  E , Veale  JL .  The impact of minorities and immigrants in kidney transplantation.   Ann Surg. 2019;270(6):966-968. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000003394 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Cooper  M , Leeser  DB , Flechner  SM ,  et al.  Ensuring the need is met: a 50-year simulation study of the National Kidney Registry’s family voucher program.   Am J Transplant. 2021;21(3):1128-1137. doi:10.1111/ajt.16101PubMedGoogle Scholar
17.
National Kidney Registry. Member Center terms & conditions. National Kidney Registry; 2018. Updated April 23, 2021. Accessed March 20, 2020. https://www.kidneyregistry.org/docs/NKR_MC_Terms_Conditions.pdf
18.
Wong  K , Owen-Smith  A , Caskey  F ,  et al.  Investigating ethnic disparity in living-donor kidney transplantation in the UK: patient-identified reasons for non-donation among family members.   J Clin Med. 2020;9(11):3751. doi:10.3390/jcm9113751 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Purnell  TS , Hall  YN , Boulware  LE .  Understanding and overcoming barriers to living kidney donation among racial and ethnic minorities in the United States.   Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2012;19(4):244-251. doi:10.1053/j.ackd.2012.01.008 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
If you are not a JN Learning subscriber, you can either:
Subscribe to JN Learning for one year
Buy this activity
jn-learning_Modal_Multimedia_LoginSubscribe_Purchase
Close
If you are not a JN Learning subscriber, you can either:
Subscribe to JN Learning for one year
Buy this activity
jn-learning_Modal_Multimedia_LoginSubscribe_Purchase
Close
With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Education Center Collection Sign In Modal Right
Close

Name Your Search

Save Search
Close
With a personal account, you can:
  • Track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
jn-learning_Modal_SaveSearch_NoAccess_Purchase
Close

Lookup An Activity

or

Close

My Saved Searches

You currently have no searches saved.

Close
With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Education Center Collection Sign In Modal Right
Close