Corresponding Author: Anthony J. Viera, MD, MPH, Duke University School of Medicine, 2200 W Main St, Ste 400, Durham, NC 27705 (anthony.viera@duke.edu).
Accepted for Publication: May 24, 2021.
Author Contributions: Drs Viera and Lin had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Concept and design: A. Viera, Yano, Simel, Voisin, Jonas.
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: A. Viera, Yano, Lin, Simel, Yun, Dave, Von Holle, L. Viera, Shimbo, Hardy, Donahue, Hinderliter, Jonas.
Drafting of the manuscript: A. Viera, Lin, Simel, Yun.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
Statistical analysis: Lin, Simel, Hardy.
Administrative, technical, or material support: Yun, Dave, Von Holle, L. Viera, Shimbo, Hardy, Voisin, Jonas.
Supervision: A. Viera, Yano, Jonas.
Other - Abstract and text reviewer: Dave.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Simel reported receiving honoraria for contributions to JAMAEvidence.com outside the submitted work. Dr Yun reported receiving grants from the Health Resources and Services Administration (T32-HP14001) during the conduct of the study. Dr Shimbo reported being a consultant for Abbott Vascular, Edward Lifesciences, Medtronic, and Tryton Medical and conducting event ascertainment for trials that they are conducting (testing coronary and valvular disease interventions), which have nothing to do with blood pressure measurement and hypertension, make no products in the area of blood pressure measurement and hypertension (including treatment), and are not related to the content area of the manuscript. No other disclosures were reported.
Funding/Support: Dr Viera reported past funding from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute to study out-of-office blood pressure monitoring. Dr Yun's work was supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (grant No. T32-HP14001). Dr Simel’s work was supported by the Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT) (CIN 13-410) at the Durham VA Health Care System. Dr Hardy’s work was supported by R01HL139716 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Disclaimer: Dr Simel, section editor of The Rational Clinical Examination, was not involved in the editorial review of or decision to publish this article.
Additional Contributions: The authors would like to thank Jeffrey Kravetz, MD (Connecticut Veterans Affairs Healthcare System and Yale University, New Haven, CT); Benjamin Powers, MD (St Luke’s Internal Medicine, Boise, ID; University of Washington, Seattle, WA); and Michael Goldstein, MD (Veterans Health Administration National Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Durham, NC), for their advice and expertise in manuscript preparation. These contributors were not financially compensated.
1.Whelton
PK , Carey
RM , Aronow
WS ,
et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.
Hypertension. 2018;71(6):e13-e115.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 6.Krist
AH , Davidson
KW , Mangione
CM ,
et al; US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for hypertension in adults: US Preventive Services Task Force reaffirmation recommendation statement.
JAMA. 2021;325(16):1650-1656. doi:
10.1001/jama.2021.4987PubMedGoogle Scholar 9.Simel
DL . A primer on the precision and accuracy of the clinical examination. In Simel
DL , Rennie
D , eds. The Rational Clinical Examination. McGraw-Hill; 2009.
11.Borenstein
M , Hedges
L , Higgins
J , Rothstein
H . Comprehensive Meta-Analysis, Version 3. Biostat; 2013.
12.Leeflang
MM , Deeks
JJ , Rutjes
AW , Reitsma
JB , Bossuyt
PM . Bivariate meta-analysis of predictive values of diagnostic tests can be an alternative to bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;65(10):1088-1097. doi:
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.03.006PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 14.Ishikawa
J , Hoshide
S , Eguchi
K ,
et al. Masked hypertension defined by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is associated with an increased serum glucose level and urinary albumin-creatinine ratio.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2010;12(8):578-587. doi:
10.1111/j.1751-7176.2010.00286.xPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 18.Poudel
B , Booth
JN
III , Sakhuja
S ,
et al. Prevalence of ambulatory blood pressure phenotypes using the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association blood pressure guideline thresholds: data from the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults study.
J Hypertens. 2019;37(7):1401-1410. doi:
10.1097/HJH.0000000000002055PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 21.Tocci
G , Presta
V , Figliuzzi
I ,
et al. Prevalence and clinical outcomes of white-coat and masked hypertension: analysis of a large ambulatory blood pressure database.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2018;20(2):297-305. doi:
10.1111/jch.13181PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 26.Zhuo
S , Wen
W , Li-Yuan
M , Shu-Yu
W , Yi-Xin
W . Home blood pressure measurement in prehypertension and untreated hypertension: comparison with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and office blood pressure.
Blood Press Monit. 2009;14(6):245-250. doi:
10.1097/MBP.0b013e328332fd25PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 30.Guirguis-Blake
JM , Evans
CV , Webber
EM , Coppola
EL , Perdue
LA , Weyrich
MS . Screening for hypertension in adults: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
JAMA. 2021;325(16):1657-1669. doi:
10.1001/jama.2020.21669PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 34.Viera
AJ , Lin
FC , Tuttle
LA ,
et al. Levels of office blood pressure and their operating characteristics for detecting masked hypertension based on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.
Am J Hypertens. 2015;28(1):42-49. doi:
10.1093/ajh/hpu099PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 35.Hodgkinson
J , Mant
J , Martin
U ,
et al. Relative effectiveness of clinic and home blood pressure monitoring compared with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in diagnosis of hypertension: systematic review.
BMJ. 2011;342:d3621. doi:
10.1136/bmj.d3621PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 36.Kronish
IM , Hughes
C , Quispe
K , Viera
AJ . Implementing ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in primary care practice.
Fam Pract Manag. 2020;27(3):19-25.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 38.Fryar
CD , Ostchega
Y , Hales
CM , Zhang
G , Kruszon-Moran
D . Hypertension Prevalence and Control Among Adults: United States, 2015–2016. National Center for Health Statistics; 2017.
40.Roerecke
M , Kaczorowski
J , Myers
MG . Comparing automated office blood pressure readings with other methods of blood pressure measurement for identifying patients with possible hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(3):351-362. doi:
10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.6551PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 41.Myers
MG , Matangi
M , Kaczorowski
J . Comparison of awake ambulatory blood pressure and automated office blood pressure using linear regression analysis in untreated patients in routine clinical practice.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2018;20(12):1696-1702. doi:
10.1111/jch.13409PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref