Outcomes Associated With Social Distancing Policies During the COVID-19 Pandemic | Public Health | JN Learning | AMA Ed Hub [Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]

Outcomes Associated With Social Distancing Policies in St Louis, Missouri, During the Early Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Educational Objective
To identify the key insights or developments described in this article
1 Credit CME
Key Points

Question  Given the geographic heterogeneity of the COVID-19 pandemic, is it possible to assess the outcomes of delayed social distancing policies within any one geographic location?

Findings  In this decision analytical model of 1.3 million people in St Louis, Missouri, a delay of 2 weeks in public health policies initiated on March 17, 2020, was estimated to be associated with a nearly 6-fold total increase in deaths due to COVID-19 by June 15, 2020.

Meaning  These findings suggest that timely local social distancing policies are associated with the number of COVID-19–related hospitalizations and deaths; local public health policies may avoid more severe pandemic consequences even in a widespread pandemic.

Abstract

Importance  In the absence of a national strategy in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, many public health decisions fell to local elected officials and agencies. Outcomes of such policies depend on a complex combination of local epidemic conditions and demographic features as well as the intensity and timing of such policies and are therefore unclear.

Objective  To use a decision analytical model of the COVID-19 epidemic to investigate potential outcomes if actual policies enacted in March 2020 (during the first wave of the epidemic) in the St Louis region of Missouri had been delayed.

Design, Setting, and Participants  A previously developed, publicly available, open-source modeling platform (Local Epidemic Modeling for Management & Action, version 2.1) designed to enable localized COVID-19 epidemic projections was used. The compartmental epidemic model is programmed in R and Stan, uses bayesian inference, and accepts user-supplied demographic, epidemiologic, and policy inputs. Hospital census data for 1.3 million people from St Louis City and County from March 14, 2020, through July 15, 2020, were used to calibrate the model.

Exposures  Hypothetical delays in actual social distancing policies (which began on March 13, 2020) by 1, 2, or 4 weeks. Sensitivity analyses were conducted that explored plausible spontaneous behavior change in the absence of social distancing policies.

Main Outcomes and Measures  Hospitalizations and deaths.

Results  A model of 1.3 million residents of the greater St Louis, Missouri, area found an initial reproductive number (indicating transmissibility of an infectious agent) of 3.9 (95% credible interval [CrI], 3.1-4.5) in the St Louis region before March 15, 2020, which fell to 0.93 (95% CrI, 0.88-0.98) after social distancing policies were implemented between March 15 and March 21, 2020. By June 15, a 1-week delay in policies would have increased cumulative hospitalizations from an observed actual number of 2246 hospitalizations to 8005 hospitalizations (75% CrI: 3973-15 236 hospitalizations) and increased deaths from an observed actual number of 482 deaths to a projected 1304 deaths (75% CrI, 656-2428 deaths). By June 15, a 2-week delay would have yielded 3292 deaths (75% CrI, 2104-4905 deaths)—an additional 2810 deaths or a 583% increase beyond what was actually observed. Sensitivity analyses incorporating a range of spontaneous behavior changes did not avert severe epidemic projections.

Conclusions and Relevance  The results of this decision analytical model study suggest that, in the St Louis region, timely social distancing policies were associated with improved population health outcomes, and small delays may likely have led to a COVID-19 epidemic similar to the most heavily affected areas in the US. These findings indicate that an open-source modeling platform designed to accept user-supplied local and regional data may provide projections tailored to, and more relevant for, local settings.

Sign in to take quiz and track your certificates

Buy This Activity

JN Learning™ is the home for CME and MOC from the JAMA Network. Search by specialty or US state and earn AMA PRA Category 1 CME Credit™ from articles, audio, Clinical Challenges and more. Learn more about CME/MOC

CME Disclosure Statement: Unless noted, all individuals in control of content reported no relevant financial relationships. If applicable, all relevant financial relationships have been mitigated.

Article Information

Accepted for Publication: June 27, 2021.

Published: September 1, 2021. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.23374

Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2021 Geng EH et al. JAMA Network Open.

Corresponding Author: Elvin H. Geng, MD, MPH, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, 4523 Clayton Ave, CB 8051, St Louis, MO 63110 (elvin.geng@wustl.edu).

Author Contributions: Dr Geng and Mr Schwab had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Concept and design: Geng, Fox, Schootman, Mody, Powderly, Yount, Petersen.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Geng, Schwab, Foraker, Fox, Hoehner, Schootman, Mody, Powderly, Woeltje, Petersen.

Drafting of the manuscript: Geng, Petersen.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.

Statistical analysis: Geng, Schwab, Fox, Schootman, Petersen.

Obtained funding: Geng, Powderly.

Administrative, technical, or material support: Mody, Yount, Woeltje.

Supervision: Geng, Woeltje, Petersen.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Geng reported receiving an educational grant from Viiv Healthcare and grants from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences/the National Institutes of Health Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences during the conduct of the study. Dr Schwab reported receiving personal fees from Washington University in St Louis during the conduct of the study. Dr Powderly reported receiving personal fees from Merck Labs outside the submitted work. Dr Petersen reported receiving personal fees from University of Washington as a methodology consultant outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Funding/Support: This study was supported by grant No. 5221 from the Institute for Public Health, Washington University in St Louis, Missouri (Dr Geng).

Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funder had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

References
1.
IHME COVID-19 Forecasting Team.  Modeling COVID-19 scenarios for the United States.   Nat Med. 2021;27(1):94-105. doi:10.1038/s41591-020-1132-9PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Zhang  S , Diao  M , Yu  W , Pei  L , Lin  Z , Chen  D .  Estimation of the reproductive number of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) and the probable outbreak size on the Diamond Princess cruise ship: a data-driven analysis.   Int J Infect Dis. 2020;93:201-204. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2020.02.033 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Billah  MA , Miah  MM , Khan  MN .  Reproductive number of coronavirus: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on global level evidence.   PLoS One. 2020;15(11):e0242128. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0242128 PubMedGoogle Scholar
4.
Huang  C , Wang  Y , Li  X ,  et al.  Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China.   Lancet. 2020;395(10223):497-506. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Schwab  J , Balzer  L , Peng  J , Geng  E , Petersen  M . Local epidemiological modeling for management and action. Accessed June 15, 2021. https://github.com/LocalEpi/LEMMA
6.
Gelman  A , Lee  D , Guo  J .  Stan: a probabilistic programming language for bayesian inference and optimization.   J Educ Behav Stat. 2015;40(5):530-543. doi:10.3102/1076998615606113 Google Scholar
7.
Verity  R , Okell  LC , Dorigatti  I ,  et al.  Estimates of the severity of coronavirus disease 2019: a model-based analysis.   Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(6):669-677. PubMedGoogle Scholar
8.
McAloon  C , Collins  Á , Hunt  K ,  et al.  Incubation period of COVID-19: a rapid systematic review and meta-analysis of observational research.   BMJ Open. 2020;10(8):e039652. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039652 PubMedGoogle Scholar
9.
Chu  DK , Akl  EA , Duda  S ,  et al; COVID-19 Systematic Urgent Review Group Effort (SURGE) study authors.  Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.   Lancet. 2020;395(10242):1973-1987. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31142-9 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Byambasuren  O , Cardona  M , Bell  K , Clark  J , McLaws  ML , Glasziou  P .  Estimating the extent of asymptomatic COVID-19 and its potential for community transmission: systematic review and meta-analysis.   Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2020;5(4):223-234. doi:10.1101/2020.05.10.20097543Google Scholar
11.
Faust  JS , Lin  Z , Del Rio  C .  Comparison of estimated excess deaths in New York City during the COVID-19 and 1918 influenza pandemics.   JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(8):e2017527. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.17527 PubMedGoogle Scholar
12.
Markel  H , Lipman  HB , Navarro  JA ,  et al.  Nonpharmaceutical interventions implemented by US cities during the 1918-1919 influenza pandemic.   JAMA. 2007;298(6):644-654. doi:10.1001/jama.298.6.644 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Betsch  C .  How behavioural science data helps mitigate the COVID-19 crisis.   Nat Hum Behav. 2020;4(5):438. doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0866-1 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
McClure  ES , Vasudevan  P , Bailey  Z , Patel  S , Robinson  WR .  Racial capitalism within public health—how occupational settings drive COVID-19 disparities.   Am J Epidemiol. 2020;189(11):1244-1253. doi:10.1093/aje/kwaa126 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Kerkhoff  AD , Sachdev  D , Mizany  S ,  et al.  Evaluation of a novel community-based COVID-19 ‘Test-to-Care’ model for low-income populations.   PLoS One. 2020;15(10):e0239400. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0239400 PubMedGoogle Scholar
16.
Pichler  S , Wen  K , Ziebarth  NR .  COVID-19 emergency sick leave has helped flatten the curve in the United States.   Health Aff. 2020;39(12):2197–204. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00863 Google ScholarCrossref
17.
Price-Haywood  EG , Burton  J , Fort  D , Seoane  L .  Hospitalization and mortality among Black patients and White patients with Covid-19.   N Engl J Med. 2020;382(26):2534-2543. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa2011686 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
If you are not a JN Learning subscriber, you can either:
Subscribe to JN Learning for one year
Buy this activity
jn-learning_Modal_Multimedia_LoginSubscribe_Purchase
Close
If you are not a JN Learning subscriber, you can either:
Subscribe to JN Learning for one year
Buy this activity
jn-learning_Modal_Multimedia_LoginSubscribe_Purchase
Close
With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Education Center Collection Sign In Modal Right
Close

Name Your Search

Save Search
Close
With a personal account, you can:
  • Track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
jn-learning_Modal_SaveSearch_NoAccess_Purchase
Close

Lookup An Activity

or

Close

My Saved Searches

You currently have no searches saved.

Close

My Saved Courses

You currently have no courses saved.

Close
With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Education Center Collection Sign In Modal Right
Close