Shared Decision-making and Decisional Conflict in Otolaryngologic Surgery | Otolaryngology | JN Learning | AMA Ed Hub [Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]

Patients’ Views of Shared Decision-making and Decisional Conflict in Otolaryngologic Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Educational Objective
To identify the key insights or developments described in this article
1 Credit CME
Key Points

Question  What is the prevalence of decisional conflict for surgical patients during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic?

Findings  In this cross-sectional survey study of 182 patients scheduled for otolaryngologic surgery during the pandemic, non-White participants without college education were 10 times more likely to screen positive for decisional conflict compared with college-educated White participants. Concerns about intraoperative and postoperative processes were more prominent than COVID-19 concerns.

Meaning  The results of this survey study suggest the need for health care professionals to converse with patients about patient values, beliefs, and specific concerns about treatment; future studies to elucidate racial health care inequities are warranted.

Abstract

Importance  A patient’s decision to undergo surgery may be fraught with uncertainty and decisional conflict. The unpredictable nature of the COVID-19 pandemic warrants further study into factors associated with patient decision-making.

Objective  To assess decisional conflict and patient-specific concerns for people undergoing otolaryngologic surgery during the pandemic.

Design, Setting, Participants  This prospective cross-sectional survey study was conducted via telephone from April 22 to August 31, 2020. English-speaking adults scheduled for surgery from a single academic surgical center were invited to participate. Individuals who were non-English speaking, lacked autonomous medical decision-making capacity, scheduled for emergent surgery, or had a communication disability were excluded. For race and ethnicity reporting, participants were classified dichotomously as White according to the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or non-White as a collective term including Black or African American, American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, or Pacific Islander race and ethnicity.

Exposures  The SURE Questionnaire (sure of myself, understand information, risks/benefits ratio, and encouragement) was used to screen for decisional conflict, with a total score greater than or equal to 3 indicating clinically significant decisional conflict. Participants were asked to share their specific concerns about having surgery.

Main Outcome and Measures  Decisional conflict and patient demographic data were assessed via bivariate analyses, multivariable logistic regression and conjunctive consolidation. Patient-specific concerns were qualitatively analyzed for summative themes.

Results  Of 444 patients screened for eligibility, 182 (40.9%) respondents participated. The median age was 60.5 years (interquartile range, 48-70 years). The racial and ethnic identity of the participants was classified as binary White (84% [153 of 182]) and non-White (16% [29 of 182]). The overall prevalence of decisional conflict was 19% (34 of 182). Decisional conflict was more prevalent among non-White than White participants (proportion difference 18.8%, 95% CI, 0.6%-37.0% and adjusted odds ratio 3.0; 95% CI, 1.2-7.4). Combining information from multiple variables through conjunctive consolidation, the group with the highest rate of decisional conflict was non-White patients with no college education receiving urgent surgery (odds ratio, 10.8; 95% CI, 2.6-45.0). Intraoperative and postoperative concerns were the most common themes expressed by participants. There was a clinically significant difference in the proportion of participants who screened positive for decisional conflict (30%) and expressed postoperative concerns than those who screened negative for decisional conflict (17%) (proportion difference, 13%; 95% CI, 1%-25%). Among patients reporting concerns about COVID-19, most screened positive for decisional conflict.

Conclusions and Relevance  Results of this cross-sectional survey study suggest that the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with decisional conflict in patients undergoing otolaryngologic surgery. Consistent discussion of risks and benefits is essential. The role of race and ethnicity in decisional conflict warrants further study.

Sign in to take quiz and track your certificates

Buy This Activity

JN Learning™ is the home for CME and MOC from the JAMA Network. Search by specialty or US state and earn AMA PRA Category 1 CME Credit™ from articles, audio, Clinical Challenges and more. Learn more about CME/MOC

Article Information

Accepted for Publication: July 14, 2021.

Published Online: September 9, 2021. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2021.2230

Corresponding Author: John J. Chi, MD, MPHS, Division of Facial Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, 660 S Euclid Ave, Campus Box 8115, St Louis, MO 63110 (johnchi@wustl.edu).

Author Contributions: Drs Wamkpah and Chi had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Concept and design: Wamkpah, Piccirillo, Chi.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Wamkpah, Gerndt, Kallogjeri, Chi.

Drafting of the manuscript: Wamkpah, Gerndt.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Wamkpah, Kallogjeri, Piccirillo, Chi.

Statistical analysis: Wamkpah, Kallogjeri.

Administrative, technical, or material support: Chi.

Supervision: Piccirillo, Chi.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Kallogjeri reported receiving personal fees as Statistics Editor for JAMA Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery and owning stock in Potentia Metrics. No other disclosures were reported.

Funding/Support: Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Deafness and Other Communication Disorders within the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under award 5T32DC000022-30 and by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the NIH under award UL1TR002345. The use of Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) for this project was supported by the Clinical and Translational Science Award grant UL1 TR000448 and Siteman Comprehensive Cancer Center and NCI Cancer Center support grant P30 CA091842.

Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funding organizations had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Disclaimer: The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. Dr Piccirillo is Editor and Dr Kallogjeri is Statistics Editor of JAMA Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, but they were not involved in any of the decisions regarding review of the manuscript or its acceptance.

Additional Contributions: We thank the patients for granting permission to publish this information, and the details about race and ethnicity as collective descriptions were included in verbal phone consent. We thank Drs Joseph Bradley, Gregory Branham, Molly Huston, Randal Paniello, Patrik Pipkorn, Jason Rich, and Emily Spataro (Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO) for access to patients from their practices for recruitment.

References
1.
Politi  MC , Street  RL  Jr .  The importance of communication in collaborative decision making: facilitating shared mind and the management of uncertainty.   J Eval Clin Pract. 2011;17(4):579-584. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01549.x PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Chi  JJ .  Reflections on shared decision making.   Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;159(5):809-810. doi:10.1177/0194599818792212 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Chi  JJ , Rosenberg  A , Hahn  S ,  et al.  Patient concerns about nasal reconstruction after Mohs surgery and implications for shared decision making.   JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;144(12):1180-1181. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2018.2368 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Graham  ME , Westerberg  BD , Lea  J ,  et al.  Shared decision making and decisional conflict in the management of vestibular schwannoma: a prospective cohort study.   J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;47(1):52. doi:10.1186/s40463-018-0297-4 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Ferron Parayre  A , Labrecque  M , Rousseau  M , Turcotte  S , Légaré  F .  Validation of SURE, a four-item clinical checklist for detecting decisional conflict in patients.   Med Decis Making. 2014;34(1):54-62. doi:10.1177/0272989X13491463PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Chen  N , Zhou  M , Dong  X ,  et al.  Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study.   Lancet. 2020;395(10223):507-513. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30211-7 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
McMichael  TM , Currie  DW , Clark  S ,  et al; Public Health–Seattle and King County, EvergreenHealth, and CDC COVID-19 Investigation Team.  Epidemiology of covid-19 in a long-term care facility in King County, Washington.   N Engl J Med. 2020;382(21):2005-2011. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2005412 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Chorney  J , Haworth  R , Graham  ME , Ritchie  K , Curran  JA , Hong  P .  Understanding shared decision making in pediatric otolaryngology.   Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;152(5):941-947. doi:10.1177/0194599815574998 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Hong  P , Gorodzinsky  AY , Taylor  BA , Chorney  JM .  Parental decision making in pediatric otoplasty: the role of shared decision making in parental decisional conflict and decisional regret.   Laryngoscope. 2016;126(suppl 5):S5-S13. doi:10.1002/lary.26071 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Hong  P , Maguire  E , Purcell  M , Ritchie  KC , Chorney  J .  Decision-making quality in parents considering adenotonsillectomy or tympanostomy tube insertion for their children.   JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;143(3):260-266. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2016.3365 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Manning  AM , Duggins  AL , Tiemeyer  KA ,  et al.  Characterizing decisional conflict for caregivers of children with obstructive sleep apnea without tonsillar hypertrophy.   J Clin Sleep Med. 2018;14(5):849-855. doi:10.5664/jcsm.7122 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Ritchie  KC , Chorney  J , Hong  P .  Parents’ decisional conflict, self-determination and emotional experiences in pediatric otolaryngology: a prospective descriptive-comparative study.   Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;86:114-117. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.04.034 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Taylor  BA , Hart  RD , Rigby  MH , Trites  J , Taylor  SM , Hong  P .  Decisional conflict in patients considering diagnostic thyroidectomy with indeterminate fine needle aspirate cytopathology.   J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;45:16. doi:10.1186/s40463-016-0130-x PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Graham  ME , Haworth  R , Chorney  J , Bance  M , Hong  P .  Decisional conflict in parents considering bone-anchored hearing devices in children with unilateral aural atresia.   Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2015;124(12):925-930. doi:10.1177/0003489415592000 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Shuman  AG , Larkin  K , Thomas  D ,  et al.  Patient reflections on decision making for laryngeal cancer treatment.   Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;156(2):299-304. doi:10.1177/0194599816683377 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Harris  PA , Taylor  R , Minor  BL ,  et al; REDCap Consortium.  The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners.   J Biomed Inform. 2019;95:103208. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208 PubMedGoogle Scholar
17.
Harris  PA , Taylor  R , Thielke  R , Payne  J , Gonzalez  N , Conde  JG .  Research electronic data capture (REDCap): a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.   J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377-381. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
O’Connor  AM .  Validation of a decisional conflict scale.   Med Decis Making. 1995;15(1):25-30. doi:10.1177/0272989X9501500105 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Hwang  R , Lambrechts  S , Liu  H ,  et al.  Decisional conflict among patients considering treatment options for lumbar herniated disc.   World Neurosurg. 2018;116:e680-e690. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.05.068 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. July 2021. Accessed August 10, 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/questionnaires/pdf-ques/2020-BRFSS-Questionnaire-508.pdf
21.
American College of Surgeons. COVID-19: Guidance for triage of non-emergent surgical procedures. Published March 17, 2020. Accessed February 12, 2021. https://www.facs.org/covid-19/clinical-guidance/triage
22.
Kallogjeri  D , Piccirillo  JF , Spitznagel  EL  Jr , Steyerberg  EW .  Comparison of scoring methods for ACE-27: simpler is better.   J Geriatr Oncol. 2012;3(3):238-245. doi:10.1016/j.jgo.2012.01.006 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
National Governors Association. Coronavirus state actions. July 31, 2020. Accessed September 29, 2020. https://www.nga.org/coronavirus-state-actions-all/
24.
Feinstein  AR , Wells  CK , Walter  SD .  A comparison of multivariable mathematical methods for predicting survival—I: introduction, rationale, and general strategy.   J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(4):339-347. doi:10.1016/0895-4356(90)90120-E PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Neely  JG , Lieu  JE , Sequeira  SM ,  et al.  Practical guide to understanding multivariable analyses, Part B: conjunctive consolidation.   Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;148(3):359-365. doi:10.1177/0194599812471500 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Harris  VC , Links  AR , Walsh  J ,  et al.  A systematic review of race/ethnicity and parental treatment decision-making.   Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2018;57(12):1453-1464. doi:10.1177/0009922818788307 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Ikeda  AK , Hong  P , Ishman  SL , Joe  SA , Randolph  GW , Shin  JJ .  Evidence-based medicine in otolaryngology, part 8: shared decision making-impact, incentives, and instruments.   Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;159(1):11-16. doi:10.1177/0194599818763600 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Peek  ME , Wilson  SC , Gorawara-Bhat  R , Odoms-Young  A , Quinn  MT , Chin  MH .  Barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making among African-Americans with diabetes.   J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(10):1135-1139. doi:10.1007/s11606-009-1047-0 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
If you are not a JN Learning subscriber, you can either:
Subscribe to JN Learning for one year
Buy this activity
jn-learning_Modal_Multimedia_LoginSubscribe_Purchase
Close
If you are not a JN Learning subscriber, you can either:
Subscribe to JN Learning for one year
Buy this activity
jn-learning_Modal_Multimedia_LoginSubscribe_Purchase
Close
With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Education Center Collection Sign In Modal Right
Close

Name Your Search

Save Search
Close
With a personal account, you can:
  • Track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
jn-learning_Modal_SaveSearch_NoAccess_Purchase
Close

Lookup An Activity

or

Close

My Saved Searches

You currently have no searches saved.

Close
With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Education Center Collection Sign In Modal Right
Close