[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]

Clinical Guideline Synopsis of Evaluation and Management of Well-Appearing Febrile Infants Aged 8 to 60 Days

Educational Objective
To identify the key insights or developments described in this article
1 Credit CME

Efforts to develop an evidence-based approach to the evaluation and management of young febrile infants have spanned decades. Nonadherence to previous clinical prediction models1 as well as changing bacteriology,2 cost of unnecessary care, advances in testing, and evolving research provided the impetus for this guideline.3,4

Sign in to take quiz and track your certificates

Buy This Activity

JN Learning™ is the home for CME and MOC from the JAMA Network. Search by specialty or US state and earn AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ from articles, audio, Clinical Challenges and more. Learn more about CME/MOC

CME Disclosure Statement: Unless noted, all individuals in control of content reported no relevant financial relationships. If applicable, all relevant financial relationships have been mitigated.

Article Information

Corresponding Author: Eileen Murtagh Kurowski, MD, MS, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave, MLC 2008 Cincinnati, OH 45229-3039 (eileen.murtagh-kurowski@cchmc.org).

Published Online: March 14, 2022. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.0066

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

References
1.
Aronson  PL , Thurm  C , Alpern  ER ,  et al; Febrile Young Infant Research Collaborative.  Variation in care of the febrile young infant <90 days in US pediatric emergency departments.   Pediatrics. 2014;134(4):667-677. doi:10.1542/peds.2014-1382PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Powell  EC , Mahajan  PV , Roosevelt  G ,  et al; Febrile Infant Working Group of the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN).  Epidemiology of bacteremia in febrile infants aged 60 days and younger.   Ann Emerg Med. 2018;71(2):211-216. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.07.488PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Gomez  B , Mintegi  S , Bressan  S , Da Dalt  L , Gervaix  A , Lacroix  L ; European Group for Validation of the Step-by-Step Approach.  Validation of the “step-by-step” approach in the management of young febrile infants.   Pediatrics. 2016;138(2):e20154381. doi:10.1542/peds.2015-4381PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Kuppermann  N , Dayan  PS , Levine  DA ,  et al; Febrile Infant Working Group of the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN).  A clinical prediction rule to identify febrile infants 60 days and younger at low risk for serious bacterial infections.   JAMA Pediatr. 2019;173(4):342-351. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.5501PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Hui  C , Neto  G , Tsertsvadze  A ,  et al.  Diagnosis and management of febrile infants (0-3 months).   Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2012;(205):1-297.PubMedGoogle Scholar
6.
Ladhani  SN , Henderson  KL , Muller-Pebody  B , Ramsay  ME , Riordan  A .  Risk of invasive bacterial infections by week of age in infants.   Arch Dis Child. 2019;104(9):874-878. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2018-316191PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Aronson  PL , Schaeffer  P , Niccolai  LM , Shapiro  ED , Fraenkel  L .  Parents’ perspectives on communication and shared decision making for febrile infants ≤60 days old.   Pediatr Emerg Care. 2021;37(12):e1213-e1219.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Aronson  PL , Shabanova  V , Shapiro  ED ,  et al; Febrile Young Infant Research Collaborative.  A prediction model to identify febrile infants ≤60 days at low risk of invasive bacterial infection.   Pediatrics. 2019;144(1):e20183604. doi:10.1542/peds.2018-3604PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
AMA CME Accreditation Information

Credit Designation Statement: The American Medical Association designates this Journal-based CME activity activity for a maximum of 1.00  AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

Successful completion of this CME activity, which includes participation in the evaluation component, enables the participant to earn up to:

  • 1.00 Medical Knowledge MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine's (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program;;
  • 1.00 Self-Assessment points in the American Board of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery’s (ABOHNS) Continuing Certification program;
  • 1.00 MOC points in the American Board of Pediatrics’ (ABP) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program;
  • 1.00 Lifelong Learning points in the American Board of Pathology’s (ABPath) Continuing Certification program; and
  • 1.00 credit toward the CME [and Self-Assessment requirements] of the American Board of Surgery’s Continuous Certification program

It is the CME activity provider's responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting MOC credit.

Close
Want full access to the AMA Ed Hub?
After you sign up for AMA Membership, make sure you sign in or create a Physician account with the AMA in order to access all learning activities on the AMA Ed Hub
Buy this activity
Close
Want full access to the AMA Ed Hub?
After you sign up for AMA Membership, make sure you sign in or create a Physician account with the AMA in order to access all learning activities on the AMA Ed Hub
Buy this activity
Close
With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Education Center Collection Sign In Modal Right
Close

Name Your Search

Save Search
With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Close
Close

Lookup An Activity

or

My Saved Searches

You currently have no searches saved.

Close

My Saved Courses

You currently have no courses saved.

Close