Perspectives of Triage Team Members on Simulations for Scarce Resource Allocation During COVID-19 | Critical Care Medicine | JN Learning | AMA Ed Hub [Skip to Content]
Outline
Claim CME
PDF
Public Health

Perspectives of Triage Team Members Participating in Statewide Triage Simulations for Scarce Resource Allocation During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Washington State

Educational Objective
To identify the key insights or developments described in this article
1 Credit CME
JAMA Network Open
April 18, 2022
Original Investigation
Catherine R. Butler, MD, MA1,2;
Laura B. Webster, DBe, RN, HEC-C3,4;
Douglas S. Diekema, MD, MPH5,6;
Megan M. Gray, MD5;
Vicki L. Sakata, MD5,7;
Mark R. Tonelli, MD, MA8;
Kelly C. Vranas, MD, MCR9,10
Author Affiliations
  • 1Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
  • 2Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Seattle, Washington
  • 3Bioethics Program, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
  • 4Department of Bioethics and Humanities, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle
  • 5Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle
  • 6Trueman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
  • 7Northwest Healthcare Response Network, Seattle, Washington
  • 8Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
  • 9Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon
  • 10Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland
Read article on JAMA Network

MOC/CME Information

editorial comment icon
Editorial
Comment
 related articles icon
Related
Articles
 author interview icon
Interviews
 multimedia icon
Multimedia
Read Article Claim CME
Key Points

Question  What are the experiences of individuals participating in scarce resource triage teams during the COVID-19 pandemic, and how can clinicians prepare for this role?

Findings  In this qualitative study of 41 triage team members participating in multi-institutional triage simulations in Washington state, participants described how they grappled with clinical uncertainty and ethical challenges and how the triage task could conflict with professional values and required transformation of the usual clinical mindset.

Meaning  These findings highlight challenges that triage team members may face and suggest that clinical experience, education in ethical and operational foundations of triage, and experiential training may help prepare them for this difficult role.

Abstract

Importance  The COVID-19 pandemic prompted health care institutions worldwide to develop plans for allocation of scarce resources in crisis capacity settings. These plans frequently rely on rapid deployment of institutional triage teams that would be responsible for prioritizing patients to receive scarce resources; however, little is known about how these teams function or how to support team members participating in this unique task.

Objective  To identify themes illuminating triage team members’ perspectives and experiences pertaining to the triage process.

Design, Setting, and Participants  This qualitative study was conducted using inductive thematic analysis of observations of Washington state triage team simulations and semistructured interviews with participants during the COVID-19 pandemic from December 2020 to February 2021. Participants included clinician and ethicist triage team members. Data were analyzed from December 2020 through November 2021.

Main Outcomes and Measures  Emergent themes describing the triage process and experience of triage team members.

Results  Among 41 triage team members (mean [SD] age, 50.3 [11.4] years; 21 [51.2%] women) who participated in 12 simulations and 21 follow-up interviews, there were 5 Asian individuals (12.2%) and 35 White individuals (85.4%); most participants worked in urban hospital settings (32 individuals [78.0%]). Three interrelated themes emerged from qualitative analysis: (1) understanding the broader approach to resource allocation: participants strove to understand operational and ethical foundations of the triage process, which was necessary to appreciate their team’s specific role; (2) contending with uncertainty: team members could find it difficult or feel irresponsible making consequential decisions based on limited clinical and contextual patient information, and they grappled with ethically ambiguous features of individual cases and of the triage process as a whole; and (3) transforming mindset: participants struggled to disentangle narrow determinations about patients’ likelihood of survival to discharge from implicit biases and other ethically relevant factors, such as quality of life. They cited the team’s open deliberative process, as well as practice and personal experience with triage as important in helping to reshape their usual cognitive approach to align with this unique task.

Conclusions and Relevance  This study found that there were challenges in adapting clinical intuition and training to a distinctive role in the process of scarce resource allocation. These findings suggest that clinical experience, education in ethical and operational foundations of triage, and experiential training, such as triage simulations, may help prepare clinicians for this difficult role.

Sign in to take quiz and track your certificates

Buy This Activity

JN Learning™ is the home for CME and MOC from the JAMA Network. Search by specialty or US state and earn AMA PRA Category 1 CME Credit™ from articles, audio, Clinical Challenges and more. Learn more about CME/MOC

CME Disclosure Statement: Unless noted, all individuals in control of content reported no relevant financial relationships. If applicable, all relevant financial relationships have been mitigated.

See More About

Critical Care Medicine Emergency Medicine Ethics Public Health Coronavirus (COVID-19)
Article Information

Accepted for Publication: February 28, 2022.

Published: April 18, 2022. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.7639

Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2022 Butler CR et al. JAMA Network Open.

Corresponding Author: Catherine R. Butler, MD, MA, Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, 325 Ninth Ave, Seattle, WA 98104 (cathb@uw.edu).

Author Contributions: Dr Butler had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Concept and design: Butler, Webster, Diekema, Gray, Sakata, Tonelli.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Butler, Webster, Diekema, Gray, Tonelli, Vranas.

Drafting of the manuscript: Butler, Vranas.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.

Statistical analysis: Butler.

Obtained funding: Butler.

Administrative, technical, or material support: Butler, Gray, Sakata, Tonelli.

Supervision: Butler, Diekema.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the US government.

Additional Contributions: The authors would like to acknowledge Josh Edrich, MPH (Northwest Healthcare Response Network), for his contributions to study coordination. They also thank the study participants, whose efforts made this work possible. The contributor and participants were not compensated for this work.

References
1.
Butler  CR , Wong  SPY , Wightman  AG , O’Hare  AMUS .  US clinicians’ experiences and perspectives on resource limitation and patient care during the COVID-19 pandemic.   JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(11):e2027315. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.27315 PubMedGoogle Scholar
2.
Toner  E , Mukherjee  V , Hanfling  D ,  et al. Crisis standards of care: lessons from New York City hospitals’ COVID-19 experience: a meeting report. Greater New York Hospital Association. Accessed March 15, 2022. https://www.gnyha.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/1_20201124-NYC-csc.pdf
3.
Emanuel  EJ , Phillips  J , Persad  G . How the coronavirus may force doctors to decide who can live and who dies. The New York Times. Accessed October 29, 2021. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/12/opinion/coronavirus-hospital-shortage.html
4.
Idaho Department of Health and Welfare. Idaho activates crisis standards of care in north Idaho due to surge in COVID-19 patients requiring hospitalization. Accessed October 29, 2021. https://healthandwelfare.idaho.gov/news/idaho-activates-crisis-standards-care-north-idaho-due-surge-covid-19-patients-requiring
5.
Knowles  H . Hospitals overwhelmed by covid are turning to “crisis standards of care”: what does that mean? The Washington Post. Accessed October 29, 2021. https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2021/09/22/crisis-standards-of-care/
6.
Committee on Guidance for Establishing Crisis Standards of Care for Use in Disaster Situations; Institute of Medicine.  Crisis Standards of Care: A Systems Framework for Catastrophic Disaster Response. US National Academies Press; 2012.
7.
Christian  MD , Devereaux  AV , Dichter  JR , Rubinson  L , Kissoon  N ; Task Force for Mass Critical Care; Task Force for Mass Critical Care.  Introduction and executive summary: care of the critically ill and injured during pandemics and disasters: CHEST consensus statement.   Chest. 2014;146(4)(suppl):8S-34S. doi:10.1378/chest.14-0732 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
World Health Organization. Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Framework for the sharing of influenza viruses and access to vaccines and other benefits. Accessed June 26, 2020. https://apps.who.int/gb/pip/
9.
The Pandemic Influenza Ethics Initiative Work Group of the Veterans Health Administration’s National Center for Ethics in Health Care. Meeting the challenge of pandemic influenza: ethical guidance for leaders and healthcare professionals in the Veterans Health Administration. Accessed March 15, 2022. https://www.ethics.va.gov/docs/pandemicflu/Meeting_the_Challenge_of_Pan_Flu-Ethical_Guidance_VHA_20100701.pdf
10.
Daugherty Biddison  EL , Faden  R , Gwon  HS ,  et al.  Too many patients…a framework to guide statewide allocation of scarce mechanical ventilation during disasters.   Chest. 2019;155(4):848-854. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2018.09.025 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Piscitello  GM , Kapania  EM , Miller  WD , Rojas  JC , Siegler  M , Parker  WF .  Variation in ventilator allocation guidelines by US state during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: a systematic review.   JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(6):e2012606. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.12606 PubMedGoogle Scholar
12.
Antommaria  AHM , Gibb  TS , McGuire  AL ,  et al; Task Force of the Association of Bioethics Program Directors.  Ventilator triage policies during the COVID-19 pandemic at U.S. hospitals associated with members of the Association of Bioethics Program Directors.   Ann Intern Med. 2020;173(3):188-194. doi:10.7326/M20-1738 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
McGuire  AL , Aulisio  MP , Davis  FD ,  et al; COVID-19 Task Force of the Association of Bioethics Program Directors (ABPD).  Ethical challenges arising in the COVID-19 pandemic: an overview from the Association of Bioethics Program Directors (ABPD) Task Force.   Am J Bioeth. 2020;20(7):15-27. doi:10.1080/15265161.2020.1764138 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Aziz  S , Arabi  YM , Alhazzani  W ,  et al.  Managing ICU surge during the COVID-19 crisis: rapid guidelines.   Intensive Care Med. 2020;46(7):1303-1325. doi:10.1007/s00134-020-06092-5 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Miller  WD , Han  X , Peek  ME , Charan Ashana  D , Parker  WF .  Accuracy of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score for in-hospital mortality by race and relevance to crisis standards of care.   JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(6):e2113891. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.13891 PubMedGoogle Scholar
16.
Kanter  RK .  Would triage predictors perform better than first-come, first-served in pandemic ventilator allocation?   Chest. 2015;147(1):102-108. doi:10.1378/chest.14-0564 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Maves  RC , Downar  J , Dichter  JR ,  et al; ACCP Task Force for Mass Critical Care.  Triage of scarce critical care resources in COVID-19 an implementation guide for regional allocation: an expert panel report of the Task Force for Mass Critical Care and the American College of Chest Physicians.   Chest. 2020;158(1):212-225. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.063 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Chuang  E , Cuartas  PA , Powell  T , Gong  MN .  “We’re not ready, but I don’t think you’re ever ready”: clinician perspectives on implementation of crisis standards of care.   AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2020;11(3):148-159. doi:10.1080/23294515.2020.1759731 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Dittmar  MS , Wolf  P , Bigalke  M , Graf  BM , Birkholz  T .  Primary mass casualty incident triage: evidence for the benefit of yearly brief re-training from a simulation study.   Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018;26(1):35. doi:10.1186/s13049-018-0501-6 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Rosoff  PM .  Who should ration?   AMA J Ethics. 2017;19(2):164-173. doi:10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.2.ecas4-1702 PubMedGoogle Scholar
21.
Gowing  JR , Walker  KN , Elmer  SL , Cummings  EA .  Disaster preparedness among health professionals and support staff: what is effective: an integrative literature review.   Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017;32(3):321-328. doi:10.1017/S1049023X1700019X PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Gray  MM , Butler  CR , Webster  LB , Tonelli  MR , Sakata  VL , Diekema  DS .  Patient information items needed to guide the allocation of scarce life-sustaining resources: a Delphi study of multidisciplinary experts.   Disaster Med Public Health Prep. Preprint posted online February 10, 2022:1-7. doi:10.1017/dmp.2021.351 PubMedGoogle Scholar
23.
Butler  CR , Webster  LB , Sakata  VL , Tonelli  MR , Diekema  DS , Gray  MM .  Functionality of scarce healthcare resource triage teams during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multi-institutional simulation study.   Crit Care Explor. 2022;4(1):e0627. doi:10.1097/CCE.0000000000000627 PubMedGoogle Scholar
24.
Giacomini  MK , Cook  DJ .  Users’ guides to the medical literature: XXIII: qualitative research in health care A: are the results of the study valid: evidence-based medicine working group.   JAMA. 2000;284(3):357-362. doi:10.1001/jama.284.3.357 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Glaser  BG , Strauss  AL .  The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine Publishing; 1967.
26.
Braun  V , Clarke  V .  Using thematic analysis in psychology.   Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77-101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa Google ScholarCrossref
27.
Birks  M , Mills  J .  Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide. 2nd ed. Sage Publications Inc; 2015.
28.
Chapman  EN , Kaatz  A , Carnes  M .  Physicians and implicit bias: how doctors may unwittingly perpetuate health care disparities.   J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(11):1504-1510. doi:10.1007/s11606-013-2441-1 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Malterud  K .  The art and science of clinical knowledge: evidence beyond measures and numbers.   Lancet. 2001;358(9279):397-400. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05548-9 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Croskerry  P .  From mindless to mindful practice—cognitive bias and clinical decision making.   N Engl J Med. 2013;368(26):2445-2448. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1303712 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
31.
Croskerry  P , Singhal  G , Mamede  S .  Cognitive debiasing 1: origins of bias and theory of debiasing.   BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22(Suppl 2)(suppl 2):ii58-ii64. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001712 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Vanstone  M , Monteiro  S , Colvin  E ,  et al.  Experienced physician descriptions of intuition in clinical reasoning: a typology.   Diagnosis (Berl). 2019;6(3):259-268. doi:10.1515/dx-2018-0069 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
33.
Hamric  AB .  Empirical research on moral distress: issues, challenges, and opportunities.   HEC Forum. 2012;24(1):39-49. doi:10.1007/s10730-012-9177-x PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
34.
Lamiani  G , Borghi  L , Argentero  P .  When healthcare professionals cannot do the right thing: a systematic review of moral distress and its correlates.   J Health Psychol. 2017;22(1):51-67. doi:10.1177/1359105315595120 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
35.
Zivot  J .  Coronavirus disease 2019 triage teams: death by number.   Crit Care Med. 2020;48(8):1241-1242. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000004435PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
36.
Butler  CR , Wong  SPY , Vig  EK , Neely  CS , O’Hare  AM .  Professional roles and relationships during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study among US clinicians.   BMJ Open. 2021;11(3):e047782.PubMedGoogle Scholar
37.
Sharma  M , Creutzfeldt  CJ , Lewis  A ,  et al.  Health-care professionals’ perceptions of critical care resource availability and factors associated with mental well-being during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): results from a US survey.   Clin Infect Dis. 2021;72(10):e566-e576 doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa1311 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
38.
West  CP , Dyrbye  LN , Sinsky  C ,  et al.  Resilience and burnout among physicians and the general US working population.   JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(7):e209385. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9385 PubMedGoogle Scholar
39.
Joebges  S , Biller-Andorno  N .  Ethics guidelines on COVID-19 triage-an emerging international consensus.   Crit Care. 2020;24(1):201. doi:10.1186/s13054-020-02927-1PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
40.
La Puma  J , Schiedermayer  DL .  Ethics consultation: skills, roles, and training.   Ann Intern Med. 1991;114(2):155-160. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-114-2-155 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
41.
Croskerry  P , Singhal  G , Mamede  S .  Cognitive debiasing 2: impediments to and strategies for change.   BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22(Suppl 2)(suppl 2):ii65-ii72. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001713 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
42.
Gershon  RR , Vandelinde  N , Magda  LA , Pearson  JM , Werner  A , Prezant  D .  Evaluation of a pandemic preparedness training intervention of emergency medical services personnel.   Prehosp Disaster Med. 2009;24(6):508-511. doi:10.1017/S1049023X00007421 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
43.
Devnani  M .  Factors associated with the willingness of health care personnel to work during an influenza public health emergency: an integrative review.   Prehosp Disaster Med. 2012;27(6):551-566. doi:10.1017/S1049023X12001331 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
44.
Association of American Medical Colleges. Washington physician workforce profile: 2019-2020. Accessed February 20, 2022. https://www.aamc.org/media/58361/download
If you are not a JN Learning subscriber, you can either:
Subscribe to JN Learning for one year
Buy this activity
jn-learning_Modal_Multimedia_LoginSubscribe_Purchase
Close
If you are not a JN Learning subscriber, you can either:
Subscribe to JN Learning for one year
Buy this activity
jn-learning_Modal_Multimedia_LoginSubscribe_Purchase
Close
With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Education Center Collection Sign In Modal Right
Close

Name Your Search

Save Search
Privacy Policy|Terms of Use
Close
With a personal account, you can:
  • Track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
jn-learning_Modal_SaveSearch_NoAccess_Purchase
Close

Lookup An Activity

or

Close

My Saved Searches

You currently have no searches saved.

Close

My Saved Courses

You currently have no courses saved.

Close
With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Education Center Collection Sign In Modal Right
Close
Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue