[Skip to Content]

Claim CME

Public Health

Comparison of Help-Seeking Consultations for Domestic Violence Before vs During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan

Educational Objective
To identify the key insights or developments described in this article

1 Credit CME

JAMA Network Open

Published Online: August 30, 2022

Research Letter

Article Information and Disclosures

Xerxes T. Seposo, PhD, MPH^1,2

Author Affiliations

¹Department of Hygiene, Faculty of Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
²School of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan

Read article on JAMA Network

Read Article Claim CME

Since 2011, rates of professional help-seeking consultations (ie, inquiries) for domestic violence (DV) have been increasing steadily in Japan, with a considerable upward trend during the COVID-19 pandemic.¹ Pandemic-related restrictions have increased time spent in domestic settings and contributed to income instability for both perpetrators and survivors of DV.² These living conditions affect households with potentially abusive individuals, with survivors of DV bearing most of the physical and mental health burden.³ We compared rates of incident DV inquiries during the COVID-19 pandemic with years before onset in Japan.

Claim CME

Sign in to take quiz and track your certificates

Buy This Activity

Article Information

Accepted for Publication: July 15, 2022.

Published: August 30, 2022. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.29421

Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2022 Seposo XT. JAMA Network Open.

Corresponding Author: Xerxes T. Seposo, PhD, MPH, Department of Hygiene, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita 15, Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan (seposo.xerxestesoro@pop.med.hokudai.ac.jp).

Author Contributions: Dr Seposo had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Concept and design: Seposo.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Seposo.

Drafting of the manuscript: Seposo.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Seposo.

Statistical analysis: Seposo.

Obtained funding: Seposo.

Administrative, technical, or material support: Seposo.

Supervision: Seposo.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Funding/Support: This study was supported by the Hokkaido University Fiscal Year 2022 SOUSEI Support Program for Young Researchers.

Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funder had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

AMA CME Accreditation Information

Credit Designation Statement: The American Medical Association designates this Journal-based CME activity activity for a maximum of 1.00  AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

Successful completion of this CME activity, which includes participation in the evaluation component, enables the participant to earn up to:

1.00 Medical Knowledge MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine's (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program;;
1.00 Self-Assessment points in the American Board of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery’s (ABOHNS) Continuing Certification program;
1.00 MOC points in the American Board of Pediatrics’ (ABP) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program;
1.00 Lifelong Learning points in the American Board of Pathology’s (ABPath) Continuing Certification program; and
1.00 credit toward the CME [and Self-Assessment requirements] of the American Board of Surgery’s Continuous Certification program

It is the CME activity provider's responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting MOC credit.