[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]

Practical Guide to Quality Control in Surgical Trials

To identify the key insights or developments described in this article
1 Credit CME

Quality control in clinical trials can comprise several different domains (Box). In many trials, this may primarily include ensuring adherence to study protocols and data integrity. Procedural trials introduce an additional difficulty, ie, the variability inherent in procedures performed by different health care professionals in heterogeneous environments for slightly variable clinical conditions.

Data integrity is fundamental to the performance of a quality clinical trial. Intentional falsifications are much less common than unintentional errors and oversights. Good data begin with accurate data entry and are greatly facilitated by electronic medical record systems and automated data transfer. Participants can directly enter their pain scores or questionnaire answers into electronic systems, thereby obviating the chance for transcriptional errors. A surveillance strategy to prevent missing data should be created, as well as a plan for the statistical handling of missing data. Data integrity should be maintained by periodic audits verifying the recorded study data against original source documents. The timing and frequency of audits should be determined before study commencement, with a frequency and rigor appropriate to the risks and complexity of the study.

Sign in to take quiz and track your certificates

Buy This Activity

JN Learning™ is the home for CME and MOC from the JAMA Network. Search by specialty or US state and earn AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ from articles, audio, Clinical Challenges and more. Learn more about CME/MOC

CME Disclosure Statement: Unless noted, all individuals in control of content reported no relevant financial relationships. If applicable, all relevant financial relationships have been mitigated.

Article Information

Corresponding Author: Lawrence T. Kim, MD, Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology and Endocrine Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Dr, CB #7213, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7213 (lawrence_kim@med.unc.edu).

Published Online: October 26, 2022. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2022.4898

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

References
1.
Robinson  NB , Fremes  S , Hameed  I ,  et al.  Characteristics of randomized clinical trials in surgery from 2008 to 2020: a systematic review.   JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(6):e2114494. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.14494PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Abraham  NS , Young  JM , Solomon  MJ .  A systematic review of reasons for nonentry of eligible patients into surgical randomized controlled trials.   Surgery. 2006;139(4):469-483. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2005.08.014PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Lilford  RJ , Braunholtz  DA , Greenhalgh  R , Edwards  SJ .  Trials and fast changing technologies: the case for tracker studies.   BMJ. 2000;320(7226):43-46. doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7226.43PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Richman  JS , Boughey  JC . Adaptive trial designs. In: Itani  KMF , Reda  DJ , eds.  Clinical Trials Design in Operative and Non Operative Invasive Procedures. Springer; 2017:99-107.
5.
Cook  JA .  The challenges faced in the design, conduct and analysis of surgical randomised controlled trials.   Trials. 2009;10:9. doi:10.1186/1745-6215-10-9PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Farrokhyar  F , Karanicolas  PJ , Thoma  A ,  et al.  Randomized controlled trials of surgical interventions.   Ann Surg. 2010;251(3):409-416. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181cf863dPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Cook  JA , Elders  A , Boachie  C ,  et al.  A systematic review of the use of an expertise-based randomised controlled trial design.   Trials. 2015;16:241. doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0739-5PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
AMA CME Accreditation Information

Credit Designation Statement: The American Medical Association designates this Journal-based CME activity activity for a maximum of 1.00  AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

Successful completion of this CME activity, which includes participation in the evaluation component, enables the participant to earn up to:

  • 1.00 Medical Knowledge MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine's (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program;;
  • 1.00 Self-Assessment points in the American Board of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery’s (ABOHNS) Continuing Certification program;
  • 1.00 MOC points in the American Board of Pediatrics’ (ABP) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program;
  • 1.00 Lifelong Learning points in the American Board of Pathology’s (ABPath) Continuing Certification program; and
  • 1.00 CME points in the American Board of Surgery’s (ABS) Continuing Certification program

It is the CME activity provider's responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting MOC credit.

Close
Want full access to the AMA Ed Hub?
After you sign up for AMA Membership, make sure you sign in or create a Physician account with the AMA in order to access all learning activities on the AMA Ed Hub
Buy this activity
Close
Want full access to the AMA Ed Hub?
After you sign up for AMA Membership, make sure you sign in or create a Physician account with the AMA in order to access all learning activities on the AMA Ed Hub
Buy this activity
Close
With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Education Center Collection Sign In Modal Right
Close

Name Your Search

Save Search
With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Close
Close

Lookup An Activity

or

My Saved Searches

You currently have no searches saved.

Close

My Saved Courses

You currently have no courses saved.

Close