[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]

Quantitative Evaluation of Aerosol Generation During In-Office Flexible Laryngoscopy

Educational Objective
To identify the key insights or developments described in this article
1 Credit CME
Key Points

Question  Is office flexible laryngoscopy an aerosol-generating procedure?

Findings  In this cohort study of 134 patients, there were no significant changes in aerosol counts identified in patients undergoing flexible laryngoscopy, including when topical nasal spray was applied and regardless of whether the mouth was covered with a mask.

Meaning  Protocols to mitigate risk associated with aerosol-generating procedures are probably not necessary for office flexible laryngoscopy.

Abstract

Importance  Despite growing scientific knowledge and research, it is still unknown if office flexible laryngoscopy (FL) is aerosol generating and thereby potentially increases the risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission. The limited literature that exists is conflicting, precluding formal conclusions.

Objective  To determine whether FL is aerosol generating.

Design, Setting, and Participants  This prospective cohort study included 134 patients seen in the otolaryngology clinic at a single tertiary care academic institution between February and May 2021. Two optical particle sizer instruments were used, quantifying particles ranging from 0.02 μm to 5 μm. Measurements were taken every 30 seconds, with sample periods of 15 seconds throughout the patient encounter. Instruments were located 12 inches from the patient’s nares. Timing of events was recorded, including the start and end of physical examination, topical spray administration, start and end of laryngoscopy, and other potential aerosol-generating events (eg, coughing, sneezing). Data analysis was performed from February to May 2021.

Exposures  Office examination and office FL.

Main Outcomes and Measures  Bayesian online change point detection (OCPD) algorithm was used to detect significant change points (CPs) in this time-series data. The primary outcome was significant CP after FL compared with baseline physiologic variations, such as breathing and phonation.

Results  Data were collected from 134 patients between February and May 2021. Ninety-one encounters involved FL. Of this group, 51 patients (56%) wore no mask over their mouth during FL. There was no statistically significant CP in either visits involving FL or visits where FL was not performed. Use of nasal spray did not result in CP in aerosol levels. Overall, neither the number of people present in the examination room, masks over patients’ mouth, the duration of the visit, nor the duration of FL were associated with mean aerosol counts, regardless of the exposure. For larger aerosol sizes (≥1 μm), however, rooms with higher air exchange rates had significantly higher reductions in mean aerosol counts for visits involving FL.

Conclusions and Relevance  The findings of this cohort study support that FL, including topical spray administration, is not a significant aerosol-generating procedure. The Bayesian OCPD model has a promising application for future aerosol studies in otolaryngology.

Sign in to take quiz and track your certificates

Buy This Activity

JN Learning™ is the home for CME and MOC from the JAMA Network. Search by specialty or US state and earn AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ from articles, audio, Clinical Challenges and more. Learn more about CME/MOC

CME Disclosure Statement: Unless noted, all individuals in control of content reported no relevant financial relationships. If applicable, all relevant financial relationships have been mitigated.

Article Information

Accepted for Publication: September 1, 2022.

Published Online: October 27, 2022. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2022.3316

Corresponding Author: Joseph A. Paydarfar, MD, Section of Otolaryngology, Audiology, & Maxillofacial Surgery, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, One Medical Center Dr, Lebanon, NH 03766 (joseph.a.paydarfar@hitchcock.org).

Author Contributions: Drs Bastien and Paydarfar had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Concept and design: Bastien, Wiredu, Lee, Hinchcliff, Paydarfar.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.

Drafting of the manuscript: Bastien, Wiredu, Lee, Hinchcliff, Paydarfar.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Bastien, Wiredu, Rees, Paydarfar.

Statistical analysis: Bastien, Wiredu, Rees.

Administrative, technical, or material support: Bastien, Lee, Paydarfar.

Supervision: Paydarfar.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Meeting Presentation: This research was presented at the 2021 Fall Voice Conference; October 21-23, 2021; Miami, Florida.

References
1.
Klompas  M , Baker  M , Rhee  C .  What is an aerosol-generating procedure?   JAMA Surg. 2021;156(2):113-114. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2020.6643 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Wilson  NM , Marks  GB , Eckhardt  A ,  et al.  The effect of respiratory activity, non-invasive respiratory support and facemasks on aerosol generation and its relevance to COVID-19.   Anaesthesia. 2021;76(11):1465-1474. doi:10.1111/anae.15475 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Davies  A , Thomson  G , Walker  J , Bennett  A .  A review of the risks and disease transmission associated with aerosol generating medical procedures.   J Infect Prev. 2009;10(4):122-126. doi:10.1177/1757177409106456Google ScholarCrossref
4.
US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Clinical questions about COVID-19: questions and answers. Accessed March 2, 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/faq.html
5.
Fowler  RA , Guest  CB , Lapinsky  SE ,  et al.  Transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome during intubation and mechanical ventilation.   Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;169(11):1198-1202. doi:10.1164/rccm.200305-715OC PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Christian  MD , Loutfy  M , McDonald  LC ,  et al; SARS Investigation Team.  Possible SARS coronavirus transmission during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.   Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10(2):287-293. doi:10.3201/eid1002.030700 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Zheng  S , Fan  J , Yu  F ,  et al.  Viral load dynamics and disease severity in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Zhejiang province, China, January-March 2020: retrospective cohort study.   BMJ. 2020;369:m1443. doi:10.1136/bmj.m1443 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Zou  L , Ruan  F , Huang  M ,  et al.  SARS-CoV-2 viral load in upper respiratory specimens of infected patients.   N Engl J Med. 2020;382(12):1177-1179. doi:10.1056/NEJMc2001737 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Tran  K , Cimon  K , Severn  M , Pessoa-Silva  CL , Conly  J .  Aerosol generating procedures and risk of transmission of acute respiratory infections to healthcare workers: a systematic review.   PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35797. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0035797 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
World Health Organization. Infection prevention and control during health care when coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is suspected or confirmed. Published July 12, 2021. Accessed March 2, 2022. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-IPC-2021.1
11.
Rameau  A , Young  VN , Amin  MR , Sulica  L .  Flexible laryngoscopy and COVID-19.   Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;162(6):813-815. doi:10.1177/0194599820921395 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Lammers  MJW , Lea  J , Westerberg  BD .  Guidance for otolaryngology health care workers performing aerosol generating medical procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic.   J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;49(1):36. doi:10.1186/s40463-020-00429-2 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Quereshy  HA , Jella  TK , Ruthberg  JS ,  et al.  “Hot zones” for otolaryngologists: assessing the geographic distribution of aerosol-generating procedures amidst the COVID-19 pandemic.   Am J Otolaryngol. 2020;41(4):102550. doi:10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102550 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Mick  P , Murphy  R .  Aerosol-generating otolaryngology procedures and the need for enhanced PPE during the COVID-19 pandemic: a literature review.   J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;49(1):29. doi:10.1186/s40463-020-00424-7 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Matos  S , Sharma  A , Crosby  D .  Objective assessment of aerosolization during transnasal endoscopy: a systematic review.   Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022;167(3):417-424. doi:10.1177/01945998211050632 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Kay  JK , Parsel  SM , Marsh  JJ , McWhorter  AJ , Friedlander  PL .  Risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission during flexible laryngoscopy: a systematic review.   JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;146(9):851-856. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2020.1973 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Workman  AD , Jafari  A , Welling  DB ,  et al.  Airborne aerosol generation during endonasal procedures in the era of COVID-19: risks and recommendations.   Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;163(3):465-470. doi:10.1177/0194599820931805 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Murr  A , Lenze  NR , Brown  WC ,  et al.  Quantification of aerosol particle concentrations during endoscopic sinonasal surgery in the operating room.   Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2021;35(4):426-431. doi:10.1177/1945892420962335 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Adams  RP , MacKay  DJC .  Bayesian online changepoint detection.  arXiv. Posted online October 19, 2007. https://arxiv.org/abs/0710.3742
20.
Rameau  A , Lee  M , Enver  N , Sulica  L .  Is office laryngoscopy an aerosol-generating procedure?   Laryngoscope. 2020;130(11):2637-2642. doi:10.1002/lary.28973 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Boorgu  DSSK , Dharmarajan  H , Sim  ES ,  et al.  Aerosol and droplet risk of common otolaryngology clinic procedures.   Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2021;130(11):1245-1253. doi:10.1177/00034894211000502 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Appendix B. Air. guidelines for environmental infection control in health-care facilities (2003). Accessed September 27, 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/infectioncontrol/guidelines/environmental/appendix/air.html
23.
Zheng  M , Lui  C , O’Dell  K , M Johns  M , Ference  EH , Hur  K .  Aerosol generation during laryngology procedures in the operating room.   Laryngoscope. 2021;131(12):2759-2765. doi:10.1002/lary.29729 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Brown  J , Gregson  FKA , Shrimpton  A ,  et al.  A quantitative evaluation of aerosol generation during tracheal intubation and extubation.   Anaesthesia. 2021;76(2):174-181. doi:10.1111/anae.15292 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
O’Neil  CA , Li  J , Leavey  A ,  et al; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Epicenters Program.  Characterization of aerosols generated during patient care activities.   Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65(8):1335-1341. doi:10.1093/cid/cix535 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Pu  Y , Kline  LC , Khawaja  N , Van Liew  M , Berry  J .  Comparison of optical particle sizing and cascade impaction for measuring the particle size of a suspension metered dose inhaler.   Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2015;41(5):737-743. doi:10.3109/03639045.2014.900079 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Malladi  R , Kalamangalam  GP , Aazhang  B . Online Bayesian change point detection algorithms for segmentation of epileptic activity. In:  2013 Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; 2013:1833-1837. doi:10.1109/ACSSC.2013.6810619
28.
Gee  AH , Chang  J , Ghosh  J , Paydarfar  D .  Bayesian online changepoint detection of physiological transitions.   Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2018;2018:45-48. doi:10.1109/EMBC.2018.8512204Google Scholar
29.
Jiang  S , Zhou  Q , Zhan  X , Li  Q .  BayesSMILES: Bayesian segmentation modeling for longitudinal epidemiological studies.   J Data Sci. 2021;19(3):365-389.doi:10.6339/21-JDS1009 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
World Health Organization. Infection prevention and control of epidemic- and pandemic-prone acute respiratory infections in health care. Published April 7, 2014. Accessed September 27, 2022. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/infection-prevention-and-control-of-epidemic-and-pandemic-prone-acute-respiratory-infections-in-health-care
Close
Want full access to the AMA Ed Hub?
After you sign up for AMA Membership, make sure you sign in or create a Physician account with the AMA in order to access all learning activities on the AMA Ed Hub
Buy this activity
Close
Want full access to the AMA Ed Hub?
After you sign up for AMA Membership, make sure you sign in or create a Physician account with the AMA in order to access all learning activities on the AMA Ed Hub
Buy this activity
Close
With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Education Center Collection Sign In Modal Right
Close

Name Your Search

Save Search
With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Close
Close

Lookup An Activity

or

My Saved Searches

You currently have no searches saved.

Close

My Saved Courses

You currently have no courses saved.

Close