[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]

Screening for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in AdultsUS Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement

To identify the key insights or developments described in this article
1 Credit CME
Abstract

Importance  Current prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in the US is not well established; however, based on cohort and survey data, in 2007-2010 the estimated prevalence of at least mild OSA (defined as an apnea-hypoxia index [AHI] ≥5) plus symptoms of daytime sleepiness among adults aged 30 to 70 years was 14% for men and 5% for women, and the estimated prevalence of moderate to severe OSA (defined as AHI ≥15) was 13% for men and 6% for women. Severe OSA is associated with increased all-cause mortality. Other adverse health outcomes associated with untreated OSA include cardiovascular disease and cerebrovascular events, type 2 diabetes, cognitive impairment, decreased quality of life, and motor vehicle crashes.

Objective  To update its 2017 recommendation, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) commissioned a systematic review to evaluate the benefits and harms of screening for OSA in adults.

Population  Asymptomatic adults (18 years or older) and adults with unrecognized symptoms of OSA.

Evidence Assessment  The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for OSA in the general adult population.

Recommendation  The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for OSA in the general adult population. (I statement)

Sign in to take quiz and track your certificates

Buy This Activity

JN Learning™ is the home for CME and MOC from the JAMA Network. Search by specialty or US state and earn AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ from articles, audio, Clinical Challenges and more. Learn more about CME/MOC

CME Disclosure Statement: Unless noted, all individuals in control of content reported no relevant financial relationships. If applicable, all relevant financial relationships have been mitigated.

Article Information

Corresponding Author: Carol M. Mangione, MD, MSPH, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, 10940 Wilshire Blvd, Ste 700, Los Angeles, CA 90024 (chair@uspstf.net).

Accepted for Publication: October 14, 2022.

The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) Members: Carol M. Mangione, MD, MSPH; Michael J. Barry, MD; Wanda K. Nicholson, MD, MPH, MBA; Michael Cabana, MD, MA, MPH; David Chelmow, MD; Tumaini Rucker Coker, MD, MBA; Karina W. Davidson, PhD, MASc; Esa M. Davis, MD, MPH; Katrina E. Donahue, MD, MPH; Carlos Roberto Jaén, MD, PhD, MS; Martha Kubik, PhD, RN; Li Li, MD, PhD, MPH; Gbenga Ogedegbe, MD, MPH; Lori Pbert, PhD; John M. Ruiz, PhD; James Stevermer, MD, MSPH; John B. Wong, MD.

Affiliations of The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) Members: University of California, Los Angeles (Mangione); Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (Barry); University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (Nicholson, Donahue); Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, New York (Cabana); Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (Chelmow); University of Washington, Seattle (Rucker Coker); Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research at Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York (Davidson); University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Davis); The University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio (Jaén); George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia (Kubik); University of Virginia, Charlottesville (Li); New York University, New York, New York (Ogedegbe); University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester (Pbert); University of Arizona, Tucson (Ruiz); University of Missouri, Columbia (Stevermer); Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts (Wong).

Author Contributions: Dr Mangione had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. The USPSTF members contributed equally to the recommendation statement.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Authors followed the policy regarding conflicts of interest described at https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Name/conflict-of-interest-disclosures. All members of the USPSTF receive travel reimbursement and an honorarium for participating in USPSTF meetings.

Funding/Support: The USPSTF is an independent, voluntary body. The US Congress mandates that the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) support the operations of the USPSTF.

Role of the Funder/Sponsor: AHRQ staff assisted in the following: development and review of the research plan, commission of the systematic evidence review from an Evidence-based Practice Center, coordination of expert review and public comment of the draft evidence report and draft recommendation statement, and the writing and preparation of the final recommendation statement and its submission for publication. AHRQ staff had no role in the approval of the final recommendation statement or the decision to submit for publication.

Disclaimer: Recommendations made by the USPSTF are independent of the US government. They should not be construed as an official position of AHRQ or the US Department of Health and Human Services.

Additional Contributions: We thank Justin Mills, MD, MPH (AHRQ), who contributed to the writing of the manuscript, and Lisa Nicolella, MA (AHRQ), who assisted with coordination and editing.

Additional Information: The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) makes recommendations about the effectiveness of specific preventive care services for patients without obvious related signs or symptoms. It bases its recommendations on the evidence of both the benefits and harms of the service and an assessment of the balance. The USPSTF does not consider the costs of providing a service in this assessment. The USPSTF recognizes that clinical decisions involve more considerations than evidence alone. Clinicians should understand the evidence but individualize decision-making to the specific patient or situation. Similarly, the USPSTF notes that policy and coverage decisions involve considerations in addition to the evidence of clinical benefits and harms. Published by JAMA®—Journal of the American Medical Association under arrangement with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). ©2022 AMA and United States Government, as represented by the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), by assignment from the members of the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). All rights reserved.

References
1.
Peppard  PE , Young  T , Barnet  JH ,  et al.  Increased prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing in adults.   Am J Epidemiol. 2013;177(9):1006-1014. doi:10.1093/aje/kws342PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Balk  EM , Moorthy  D , Obadan  NO ,  et al.  Diagnosis and Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Adults. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2011. AHRQ publication 11-EHC052.
3.
Knauert  M , Naik  S , Gillespie  MB , Kryger  M .  Clinical consequences and economic costs of untreated obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.   World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;1(1):17-27. doi:10.1016/j.wjorl.2015.08.001PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
US Preventive Services Task Force Procedure Manual. Updated May 2021. Accessed September 30, 2022. https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/procedure-manual
5.
Osman  AM , Carter  SG , Carberry  JC , Eckert  DJ .  Obstructive sleep apnea: current perspectives.   Nat Sci Sleep. 2018;10:21-34. doi:10.2147/NSS.S124657PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Veasey  SC , Rosen  IM .  Obstructive sleep apnea in adults.   N Engl J Med. 2019;380(15):1442-1449.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Stansbury  RC , Strollo  PJ .  Clinical manifestations of sleep apnea.   J Thorac Dis. 2015;7(9):E298-E310.PubMedGoogle Scholar
8.
Dudley  KA , Patel  SR .  Disparities and genetic risk factors in obstructive sleep apnea.   Sleep Med. 2016;18:96-102. doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2015.01.015PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Johns  MW .  A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth Sleepiness Scale.   Sleep. 1991;14(6):540-545.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Chung  F , Yegneswaran  B , Liao  P ,  et al.  STOP questionnaire: a tool to screen patients for obstructive sleep apnea.   Anesthesiology. 2008;108(5):812-821. doi:10.1097/ALN.0b013e31816d83e4PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Chung  F , Subramanyam  R , Liao  P ,  et al.  High STOP-Bang score indicates a high probability of obstructive sleep apnoea.   Br J Anaesth. 2012;108(5):768-775. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Netzer  NC , Stoohs  RA , Netzer  CM ,  et al.  Using the Berlin Questionnaire to identify patients at risk for the sleep apnea syndrome.   Ann Intern Med. 1999;131(7):485-491.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Young  T , Palta  M , Dempsey  J ,  et al.  The occurrence of sleep-disordered breathing among middle-aged adults.   N Engl J Med. 1993;328(17):1230-1235. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Maislin  G , Pack  AI , Kribbs  NB ,  et al.  A survey screen for prediction of apnea.   Sleep. 1995;18(3):158-166. doi:10.1093/sleep/18.3.158PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Feltner  C , Jonas  DE , Wallace  I ,  et al.  Screening for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Adults: An Evidence Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Evidence Synthesis No. 220. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2022. AHRQ publication 22-05292-EF-1.
16.
Feltner  C , Wallace  IF , Aymes  S ,  et al.  Screening for obstructive sleep apnea in adults: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.   JAMA. Published November 15, 2022. doi:10.1001/jama.2022.18357Google Scholar
17.
Iber  C , Ancoli-Israel  S , Chesson  A ,  et al.  The AASM Manual for the Scoring of Sleep and Associated Events: Rules, Terminology and Technical Specifications. American Academy of Sleep Medicine; 2007.
18.
Ford  ES , Wheaton  AG , Cunningham  TJ ,  et al.  Trends in outpatient visits for insomnia, sleep apnea, and prescriptions for sleep medications among US adults: findings from the National Ambulatory Medical Care survey 1999-2010.   Sleep. 2014;37(8):1283-1293. doi:10.5665/sleep.3914PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Mold  JW , Quattlebaum  C , Schinnerer  E ,  et al.  Identification by primary care clinicians of patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a Practice-Based Research Network (PBRN) study.   J Am Board Fam Med. 2011;24(2):138-145. doi:10.3122/jabfm.2011.02.100095PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Sánchez-Quiroga  MÁ , Corral  J , Gómez-de-Terreros  FJ ,  et al; Spanish Sleep Network and Primary Care Group.  Primary care physicians can comprehensively manage patients with sleep apnea.   Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;198(5):648-656. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
US Preventive Services Task Force.  Screening for obstructive sleep apnea in adults: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.   JAMA. 2017;317(4):407-414. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.20325PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
US Department of Veterans Affairs. The management of chronic insomnia disorder and obstructive sleep apnea (insomnia/OSA). 2019. Accessed September 30, 2022. https://www.healthquality.va.gov/guidelines/CD/insomnia/index.asp
23.
Aurora  RN , Quan  SF .  Quality measure for screening for adult obstructive sleep apnea by primary care physicians.   J Clin Sleep Med. 2016;12(8):1185-1187. doi:10.5664/jcsm.6064PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Qaseem  A , Dallas  P , Owens  DK ,  et al.  Diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea in adults: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians.   Ann Intern Med. 2014;161(3):210-220. doi:10.7326/M12-3187PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
AMA CME Accreditation Information

Credit Designation Statement: The American Medical Association designates this Journal-based CME activity activity for a maximum of 1.00  AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

Successful completion of this CME activity, which includes participation in the evaluation component, enables the participant to earn up to:

  • 1.00 Medical Knowledge MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine's (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program;;
  • 1.00 Self-Assessment points in the American Board of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery’s (ABOHNS) Continuing Certification program;
  • 1.00 MOC points in the American Board of Pediatrics’ (ABP) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program;
  • 1.00 Lifelong Learning points in the American Board of Pathology’s (ABPath) Continuing Certification program; and
  • 1.00 CME points in the American Board of Surgery’s (ABS) Continuing Certification program

It is the CME activity provider's responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting MOC credit.

Close
Want full access to the AMA Ed Hub?
After you sign up for AMA Membership, make sure you sign in or create a Physician account with the AMA in order to access all learning activities on the AMA Ed Hub
Buy this activity
Close
Want full access to the AMA Ed Hub?
After you sign up for AMA Membership, make sure you sign in or create a Physician account with the AMA in order to access all learning activities on the AMA Ed Hub
Buy this activity
Close
With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Education Center Collection Sign In Modal Right
Close

Name Your Search

Save Search
With a personal account, you can:
  • Access free activities and track your credits
  • Personalize content alerts
  • Customize your interests
  • Fully personalize your learning experience
Close
Close

Lookup An Activity

or

My Saved Searches

You currently have no searches saved.

Close

My Saved Courses

You currently have no courses saved.

Close