[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]

Success Story: Reducing Hospitalist Burnout with Hospitalist-Driven Improvement Initiatives

Learn how hospitalists at University of Colorado created an improvement program with 4 domains to restore joy in medicine.

What Was the Problem?

Recent investigation identified a sense of clinician workforce crisis in the United States, described as an epidemic of burnout. Increasingly, correlation is being drawn between clinician burnout and the quality of care delivered. Unfortunately, hospital medicine remains among the specialties most impacted by high burnout rates and related turnover.

Developing the Intervention

In 2014, the Hospital Medicine Group leadership team at the University of Colorado set an explicit vision: to become the best academic hospitalist group in the nation by being an outstanding place to work. The team asked the question: If everyone in our group were thriving in their profession, what would that look like? The team committed to regularly measuring the experience of the group every 12-18 months within several important domains using standardized survey instruments. Importantly, measurement was not an end, but rather a springboard for group dialogue that explored insights, surfaced shared core values, and identified intervention priorities.

The Intervention

Based on the dialogue that emerged from the measurement tool, interventions focused on 4 domains:

  1. The emotional experience of work

  2. Translating empathy to action

  3. Professional development

  4. Redesign of structures and processes

Organizational leaders often exclusively focus on the fourth domain. While this is no doubt important, it is insufficient for the purposes of promoting joy in practice and overall well-being. Smaller interventions at the level of the hospitalist team members and team leaders in all 4 domains were the focus of these quality improvement (QI) projects. Examples included:

Emotional Experience of Work: Something Awesome

In this domain, an agenda item called “Something Awesome” was added to the monthly hospitalist group meetings. For this item, a hospitalist shared a 3-minute story of a recent “awesome” encounter he or she had while providing care for patients.

Translating Empathy to Action: Flash Mobs

In this domain, the group developed their own spin on flash mobs. Here, “Flash Mobs” were group conversations—facilitated by a group leader and convened in the hospital in real-time—in order to hear from people and discuss topics of concern. Topics ranged from strategies to manage patient volume surges, to how holidays should be scheduled, to disagreements between specialties. These conversations often have led to direct and timely interventions.

Professional Development: Launch-Pad

In this domain, the group created a novel, year-long “Launch-Pad” seminar series for new faculty. The series included practical training related to clinical and academic success in four areas: Clinical Skills, Quality and Safety, Leadership, and Education and Scholarship. Continuing Medical Education (CME) funding rules were also changed to allow a broader range of activities of interest. Whereas traditional CME funding was limited to clinically focused professional conference attendance, the expanded rules supported a range of activities, from purchasing board review materials to attending a leadership development course.

Redesign of Structures and Processes: Improving the Clinical Schedule

In the domain of redesign of processes and structures, one clear target for improvement was the clinical schedule. To better understand the goals for change, a working group conducted multiple structured individual interviews with more than 20 hospitalists to define the core values of the group related to the clinical schedule (eg, fairness, flexibility, timeliness, alignment with other hospital responsibilities). The group then used QI tools such as value-stream mapping to analyze and improve the clinical shift schedule. This enhanced the ability for clinicians to more fairly and predictably place PTO requests, and to have the clinical schedule in place with more lead time.

Additional examples included a collaborative case review for tough clinical cases, “Above and Beyond” awards, a leadership development series, leader rounding, annual review revamp, leadership role expansion by placing more practice members in new “associate” leadership roles in key strategic domains such as quality and safety, faculty coaching, a parental leave task force, and an excellence in communication course.

To support these efforts, it was essential to create venues to tap into the fundamental knowledge and creativity of hospitalists to build novel solutions for themselves. A select group of “incubators” received a small amount of funding to apply design-thinking processes to key questions. In this way, solutions were not “rolled-out” from the top-down, but rather co-created by the group itself. This allowed for quicker timelines for changes to be made, which is often not possible for top-down policy changes.


From 2014-2019, the hospitalist group developed over a dozen tangible and sustainable interventions as a result of these individual QI projects. Quantitative improvements in well-being measurements were significant. In 2014, 30% felt that “our culture makes it easy to learn from the mistakes of others,” 24% had become more callous toward people in their current job, and 45% were experiencing burnout. By contrast, by 2017, 59% felt that “our culture makes it easy to learn from the mistakes of others,”(”69% increase), 15% had become more callous toward people in their current job (38% decrease), and 33% were experiencing burnout (27% decrease). Average annual turnover in the 5 years before the first survey was 13.2%; turnover declined during the intervention period to 6.6% (adjusted for increased number of positions). Based on the Organizational Cost of Physician Burnout Calculator, the cost of burnout plus turnover in 2013 was $464,385 per year. In contrast, all of these interventions were delivered for a fraction of that cost (an average of $86,000 annually).

About the Organization

The University of Colorado Hospital Medicine Group sits within the Division of Hospital Medicine, and consists of over 50 practicing internal medicine hospitalist physicians and advanced practice providers. These clinicians provide care primarily in a 600-bed academic quaternary care hospital and each typically care for 12-20 medically complex patients per day.

AMA Steps Forward logo

AMA STEPS Forward® presents actionable, practical toolkits and customizable resources that you can use to successfully implement meaningful and transformative change in your practice or organization. See How it Works

Article Information

Disclosure Statement: Unless noted, all individuals in control of content reported no relevant financial relationships.

Disclaimer: AMA STEPS Forward® content is provided for informational purposes only, is believed to be current and accurate at the time of posting, and is not intended as, and should not be construed to be, legal, financial, medical, or consulting advice. Physicians and other users should seek competent legal, financial, medical, and consulting advice. AMA STEPS Forward® content provides information on commercial products, processes, and services for informational purposes only. The AMA does not endorse or recommend any commercial products, processes, or services and mention of the same in AMA STEPS Forward® content is not an endorsement or recommendation. The AMA hereby disclaims all express and implied warranties of any kind related to any third-party content or offering. The AMA expressly disclaims all liability for damages of any kind arising out of use, reference to, or reliance on AMA STEPS Forward® content.


Name Your Search

Save Search

Lookup An Activity


My Saved Searches

You currently have no searches saved.


My Saved Courses

You currently have no courses saved.