[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]

EHR Inbox ManagementTame Your EHR Inbox

Learning Objectives
1. Implement standard workflows for message routing and common inbox tasks
2. Decide which team members should be responsible for various inbox tasks
3. Create filters to separate inbox signal from noise
0.25 Credit CME
How Will This Toolkit Help Me?

Learning Objectives

  • Implement standard workflows for message routing and common inbox tasks

  • Decide which team members should be responsible for various inbox tasks

  • Create filters to separate inbox signal from noise

Introduction

The EHR inbox is the default destination for most forms of communication in outpatient clinic settings. As the physician's workload grows, so does the volume of the inbox, creating a burden that is impossible to manage alone. Often, physicians face spending long hours before and after clinic to complete "between visit" clerical work.1,2 For some, this can add up to an extra 1 to 2 hours of work every day and is a major contributor to physician burnout.1,2 One study of primary care physicians found that high numbers of inbox messages required physicians to more often switch their attention between other work and processing EHR messages—adding to the time it took them to complete their inbox work.3

The reality is that (1) many inbox messages do not need to enter the inbox in the first place, and (2) of those messages that should enter the inbox, the majority do not need to be routed to the physician.

This toolkit will help you keep unnecessary messages from being routed to your inbox in the first place, guide you through establishing a centralized team inbox, and provide workflows to empower team members to contribute in a meaningful way to inbox management.

Table 1. Things That Should Not Enter the EHR Inbox

THE PHYSICIAN INBOX
WHATHOW TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM
  • Results of tests not ordered by the physician

  • Notifications of canceled orders or overdue (expiring) orders

  • Notifications of scheduled appointments

  • Patient Event Notifications which are not federally required (eg, admissions to hospital outpatient departments, colonoscopies, pharmacy visits, other ambulatory visits)

Turn off automatic notifications for physicians. Can also consider batched notifications.
  • Notifications of canceled appointments or no-shows for appointments with specialists

Institute system-wide patient outreach protocol for canceled/missed appointments originating from the department where the appointment was scheduled to take place.
  • Any untriaged patient portal messages

Use a patient portal protocol for triaging messages.
  • Refill requests for medications that treat chronic conditions

Implement a refill protocol with standing orders (as allowed by state regulation).
  • Scanned copies of documents that are already signed

  • Automated (non-personalized) specialist correspondence for specialist visits

  • Progress notes on hospitalized patients

Turn off automatic carbon copy (cc) function.
THE CARE TEAM INBOX
WHATHOW TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM
  • Logistical questions regarding tests, procedures, or appointments

Reroute to clerical or administrative inbox.
  • Clarifying questions regarding a recent visit without first being directed to review their visit note

Optimize communication with patients via after-visit summaries and shared visit notes with patients. Make the note easily accessible to patients on the patient portal.
  • Billing questions

Reroute to billing department.
  • Questions about routine lab results

Implement pre-visit planning with pre-visit labs. Consider adding FAQs about routine results as a smart phrase.
quote

“At Bellin Health, we've worked hard to redistribute inbox workloads. An effectively managed inbox leads to more timely patient care, with the work being distributed to appropriate members of the care team rather than the individual physician. It takes a team to make inbox management efficient, and this team approach ultimately leads to better, more timely patient care.”

—James Jerzak, MD; Bellin Health
Five STEPS to Optimize Your EHR Inbox

  1. Engage the IT Department

  2. Group Different Types of Messages Into Common Buckets

  3. Create Team Pools Corresponding to Each Bucket of Messages

  4. Assign Team Members to Cover Team Pools

  5. Develop Workflows and Train Team Members to Manage Team Pools

STEP 1 Engage the IT Department

Quiz Ref IDInformation technology (IT) support is essential for establishing and maintaining a manageable inbox. As seen in Table 1 above, your IT team can help configure your EHR to decrease the number of items that enter your inbox. The best way to tame the EHR inbox is to prevent unnecessary messages from entering the inbox in the first place.

It is also essential to get rid of old messages. An excessive volume of old messages in inboxes can slow down the speed of the entire EHR.

You may also consider working with IT to:

  • Consolidate folders to decrease the number of different categories in your inbox

  • Incorporate flags or checkboxes to help prioritize or route messages that need a particular team member's prompt attention.

  • Develop a system that would allow team members to mark a message for follow-up on a future date, then divert that message to a holding pen folder. The message would be re-sent to the inbox on the specified date and appear as a new message. Many EHRs make it possible to delay sending a message, and this capability improves follow-up care.

  • Develop "smartphrases" that team members can use as shortcuts for responding to items in the inbox, such as normal lab results.

STEP 2 Group Different Types of Messages Into Common Buckets

EHR systems, by default, sort messages into certain types or categories, such as:

  • Care team and staff messages

  • Phone calls

  • Refill requests

  • Results

  • Patient portal messages

  • Media (eg, faxes scanned into the chart)

  • CC'd notes, charts, or other notifications

Physicians need direct access to some message types, such as test results and staff messages (direct personalized messages to physicians from team members or other physicians).

Other message types (cc'd notes, charts, or other notifications) consist primarily of unnecessary information (noise) that does not need to enter the inbox at all, and you should work with IT to remove them from the inbox (refer back to Table 1 for examples).

The remaining message types (phone calls, patient portal messages, faxes, refill requests) should be grouped into common buckets to determine how they should be addressed and by whom (Figure 1). This will, of course, vary by your practice setting and patient population.

Figure 1. Example Buckets for Grouping Common Message Types
Box Section Ref ID

Q&A

  • What's the best approach to creating these buckets?

    Start by tracking the types of messages you're receiving in your inbox to get an idea of the volume. Examples of messages you could track include symptom-based calls, referral requests, refill requests, results requests, lab orders for future appointments, nursing home calls, medication questions, requests for appointments, etc. Keep a tally of the number of messages in each category; some types of messages are more common than others, which may differ by the physician.

    Evidence suggests that messages from patients and lab results account for up to two-thirds of inbox work time for primary care physicians, so this may be a good place to start.2

  • Should test results go to the physician's inbox or the team pool inbox?

    Where lab and imaging test results go may depend on the patient panel?regardless of pre-visit planning or pre-visit lab protocols being in place—and the physician's personal preference. However, you should not have results go to both inboxes because the actions someone takes in one inbox may not be reflected in the other. If it makes the most sense in your practice for results to go to the physician's inbox, make sure that the members of the team pool can check into it and that specific workflows are in place for managing results when necessary.

  • How does this apply to my paper inbox?

    The paper inbox can be sorted and managed in much the same way as the electronic inbox, with a non-physician team member triaging and managing the majority of items. Much of the paper inbox are forms and prior authorizations. Each team member should complete as much of the form as they are able, based on their role and training, before sending it on.

    For example, you may see an influx of school forms at the end of summer. In a sample scenario, the front desk or patient services representative (PSR) could fill out demographics and dates of visit on the form, and the medical assistant (MA) or licensed practical nurse (LPN) could fill in the rest, involving the registered nurse (RN) if needed. The form should be complete or almost complete before coming to the physician for review and signature. Once signed, the form could be routed back to the PSR to be scanned into the record for future reference and then sent to the patient. For organizations that scan all paper forms into the computer, the responsible team member can complete the task and have it scanned into the EHR upon completion.

STEP 3 Create Team Pools Corresponding to Each Bucket of Messages

Quiz Ref IDAfter gathering information on the categories of messages entering the inbox, meet with representatives from all staffing roles and IT to evaluate routing. Determine if you could implement a more efficient system for routing messages that better utilizes the entire team to the top of their skill sets. Create new team "pools" that correspond to each category; this pool will be where all messages falling into that category will be routed (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Pool Structure for Routing Inbox Messages

Quiz Ref IDIn a team pool structure, it is ideal for each physician or advanced practice provider (APPs) to have their core team of MAs, LPNs, and/or RNs who are always assigned to the pool. This consistency allows everyone to be familiar with the physician's patients and their care plans. It also decreases the chance that multiple care team members are checking the same pools and doing duplicative work or, on the flip side, messages fall through the cracks because no one knows they haven't been addressed or completed.

With this approach, the first touch on any message aside from direct personalized messages from other staff members or physicians is by a non-physician team member. Of course, any messages that require physician attention can be rerouted directly to the physician's inbox, or a team pool member can verbally notify the physician that something needs immediate attention.

Workforce shortages can complicate the team pool approach to inbox management. Therefore, it is essential to make team members feel comfortable asking physicians questions, especially when they are covering for a physician they do not typically work with. Constant communication between physicians and other team members is key.

Box Section Ref ID

Q&A

  • How many people should be part of a team pool?

    One possible composition for a team pool would be the MA and/or LPNs working with the physician, an RN, and a PSR. Adapt the number of people and composition of the team pool to fit your unique practice setting.

  • How does a team pool help with vacation coverage?

    A team pool with access to the physician's inbox allows for ongoing management while the physician is away and prevents the accumulation of work that must wait until the physician returns. Anyone on the team pool can check in and help prioritize the few items that need physician attention and route those to the covering physician. Consider establishing protocols for common inbox tasks that do not require your review and signature. With these processes and protocols in place, the MA or LPN should be able to continue to work on routine tasks such as normal test results and refills while you are gone.

STEP 4 Assign Team Members to Cover Team Pools

Empowering and trusting other members of the care team, encouraging critical thinking, and always putting the patient's needs first are team-based care principles that support efficient inbox work. In general, the core concepts for successful team-based care apply directly to inbox management.

Again, the overarching principle is that physicians should not be the first set of eyes on most messages. Clinical team members (triage RNs, MAs, APCs) can address clinical questions, and nonclinical team members such as patient liaisons, PSRs, billing staff, etc., can address nonclinical questions. Figure 3 illustrates a sample workflow for first touches for different types of inbox messages.

Figure 3. Who Takes the First Pass?

Here are some additional team-based care principles that can contribute to your success:

  • Co-locate team members. Co-location is a principle of team-based care that promotes verbal communication between all team members, resulting in less need for electronic communication that clutters the inbox. It may seem counterintuitive, but in-person communication is crucial for effective inbox management. Consider co-locating team members such as triage nurses, rooming team members, and schedulers to facilitate prompt resolution of questions or issues that arise during triage, rooming, and scheduling. While face-to-face communication is ideal, if co-location is not possible in your clinic layout, find another way to enhance communication between team members to decrease the need for electronic messaging.

  • Use verbal messaging rather than electronic messaging whenever possible. Verbal messaging is more efficient and is a richer form of communication. Co-location supports verbal messaging, but this can be the predominant form of communication in any setting.

  • Incorporate a daily huddle. Daily huddles can help you reduce unnecessary electronic communication. For example, you may use the huddle to identify appointment times for additional patient access that day instead of messaging back and forth.

Box Section Ref ID

Q&A

  • How do I know that my team responds to messages and addresses questions?

    Ask that your team insert flags to denote that something needs follow-up, needs a signature, or was completed. If your practice uses Epic®, you can ask that they mark a task "done" when completed, which removes it from view but doesn't delete it. Marking an item "done" keeps the inbox clean.

    Conversely, suppose a team member opens a message but finds that it is too complex to address at that moment. In this scenario, the team member should mark that message “new” or “unread” so that other team members do not assume it was already handled.

  • How frequently should a team pool member check the inbox for results?

    Time management is extremely important for effective inbox management.

    For example, at Bellin Health in Green Bay, WI, the most efficient MAs and LPNs learn to check the inbox continuously during the day. They make every minute count, such as handling a quick refill request in the brief time they may have between patients. For normal lab results, the team member can notify the patient via phone, patient portal, or letter, then mark the task "done" in the inbox in these short windows of time. A single RN at Bellin oversees the inbox for 3 or 4 providers; she checks into the pool at least every half day. RNs and LPNs comprise the core team at Medical Associates Clinic in Dubuque, IA. In that clinic, the nurses check the inbox continuously during the day, and then once or twice per day they verbally address any messages with the physician that will require input.

  • Do patient services representatives (PSRs) have the proper training to assist with inbox management?

    Yes, PSRs can assist with some tasks. Create a template for PSRs to follow so that they know how to respond when they receive certain requests. For example, before inbox optimization, a patient who called with a medication question might have been directed to the triage nurse. The triage nurse would need to look up the patient, medication, and physician's orders before returning the patient's call. As part of inbox optimization, the PSR would use the template to identify and route the call to the MA/LPN attached to the patient's doctor. Because this MA/LPN has a personal relationship with the patient and is familiar with the physician's orders, she can answer the question more quickly.

    Alternatively, the MA, LPN, or RN can route particular messages to the front desk staff, so they don't need to tap into the inbox directly. Examples include asking the PSRs to complete basic nonclinical information in forms, such as the practice address, physician's name, unique physician identification number (UPIN), date of the last visit, and any upcoming visits and associated labs. If you are implementing a pre-registration process, you may wish to consider having new patient coordinators fulfill some of these inbox management duties when they are not registering new patients.

  • What role can an advanced practice clinician (APC) play in inbox management?

    In some organizations, the APC role structure means they spend roughly half of their time on direct patient care, and half the time is devoted to inbox management and other deskwork support for the practice. In these models, the APC manages most messages in the physician's inbox, bringing any situations requiring additional expertise to the physician.

STEP 5 Develop Workflows and Train Team Members to Manage Pools

Creating standardized and simplified workflows and training team members on using them will help everyone on the team perform more efficiently.

Quiz Ref IDFigures 4, 5, and 6 are examples of workflows for managing patient calls, patient portal messages, and form requests.

Figure 4. Suggested Patient Call Workflow
Figure 5. Suggested Workflow for Handling Patient Portal Messages
Figure 6. Suggested Form Request Workflow

Other areas to develop:

  • Standardize prior authorizations. Develop standardized workflows so that your team can fill out prior authorizations as much as possible before coming to you for completion or signature. This approach shifts the bulk of this task to appropriate office staff working to the top of their skill set. Consider developing a centralized prior authorization team composed of RNs and MAs. Add a pharmacist to your team to help maximize the use of generic medications (and subsequently minimize the need for prior authorizations) and ensure the patient is adhering to their current medications before adding or escalating therapy.

  • Implement standard refill protocols.Refilling all long-term medications for the maximum allowed by state law (90-day supply with 4 refills, or "90x4") will markedly decrease the volume of refill requests. In many states, this maximum refill period ranges from 12 to 15 months. Consider an automated refill request system or a centralized refill team for refill requests that still come through. The refill team may be the same team that handles prior authorization requests.

    If your practice sees a high volume of patients on oral anticoagulants, consider developing a centralized INR management team to handle these results per protocol. If your clinic has an embedded pharmacist, adding them to your team pool to manage inbox tasks related to these patients could be valuable.

  • Anticipate the needs of complex patients. A robust transitional care program for complex patients leaving a hospital or skilled nursing facility could avert complications. Anticipating and meeting their needs before a crisis may, in turn, decrease inbox work and phone calls to the office.

  • Start using pre-visit laboratory testing. Pre-visit labs rely on scheduling labs for the next appointment before the patient leaves so that the office can review and send results in advance of the next visit. With protocols in place, empowered team members can perform a preliminary review and flag abnormal ones to save time for the physician. For abnormal results, there should be a protocol in place to communicate these results to either the triage RN or the physician. Most abnormal results can wait to be discussed until the day of the scheduled visit, but if something requires sooner attention, the team can contact the patient with additional instructions.

  • Empower team members with autonomy. Empowering team members to make decisions and take on additional tasks is a valuable technique for cutting down on messaging. Professional development programming can help your team members perform to the top of their licenses. Creating protocols is also very helpful, with the caveat that the protocol is not the bottom line—always communicate and ask about “out of protocol” cases as a learning opportunity.

For more information, please review the AMA STEPS Forward® Taming the EHR Playbook (PDF).

Box Section Ref ID

Q&A

  • I'm inundated with messages from skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). Is there a special technique for managing these?

    The volume of calls from these facilities can be overwhelming. It can also be confusing if tests ordered by your SNF team flow to both their inbox and yours. How to handle them depends on your practice's approach toward these patients.

    If you are working with advanced practice clinicians to manage patients in nursing homes or SNFs, it is most efficient to have test results and other messages go to the APCs instead of your inbox.

    If you have no particular program for helping SNF patients, then work with these facilities to develop standing orders that will decrease the number of calls they need to make. Communicate that your triage nurses are empowered to answer many of the questions from SNFs per protocol. Encourage SNFs to make all non-emergency calls during office hours and work with the SNF staff to batch their communications so that they make only 1 or 2 contacts a day. Be sure to order lab tests that may need follow-up, such as routine INRs or electrolyte tests, early in the week. This avoids contacting the doctor on call—who may not know the patient as well as your team—during the weekend.

Conclusion

Managing the inbox should not rest solely on the physician. There are many ways to reduce the amount of time spent on this task (Figure 7). Leverage the skills of the care team to apply the principles and workflows of team-based care to be more efficient, redistribute the inbox workload, and ultimately get more done during the clinic day.

Figure 7. Putting It All Together: Recommendations to Tame Your EHR Inbox
Box Section Ref ID
Graphic Jump Location
AMA Pearls

AMA Pearls

  • The majority of inbox messages do not require “physician eyes”, and the ones that do should be triaged prior to being sent to the physician

  • Physical co-location or brief huddles between team members and physicians can eliminate unnecessary back-and-forth message exchanges.

  • Instead of setting aside time, encourage team members to use any free moments to check the EHR inbox. For example, longer appointments may give team members who aren't part of the visit a 10- to 15-minute window to check the EHR inbox throughout the day.

Further Reading

Journal Articles and Other Publications*

  • Winner J. Practical ways to manage your EHR inbox. Fam Pract Manag. 2021;28(4):27-30. https://www.aafp.org/link_out?pmid=34254765

  • Arndt BG, Beasley JW, Watkinson MD, et al. Tethered to the EHR: primary care physician workload assessment using EHR event log data and time-motion observations. Ann Fam Med. 2017;15(5):419-426. doi:10.1370/afm.2121

  • Murphy DR, Satterly T, Giardina TD, Sittig DF, Singh H. Practicing clinicians' recommendations to reduce burden from the electronic health record inbox: a mixed-methods study. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34(9):1825-1832. doi:10.1007/s11606-019-05112-5

  • Murphy DR, Giardina TD, Satterly T, Sittig DF, Singh H. An exploration of barriers, facilitators, and suggestions for improving electronic health record inbox-related usability: a qualitative analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(10):e1912638. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.12638

  • Shanafelt TD, Dyrbye LN, Sinsky C, et al. Relationship between clerical burden and characteristics of the electronic environment with physician burnout and professional satisfaction. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016;91(7):836-848. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.05.007

  • Eaton P. Managing messages. Fam Pract Manag. 2012;19(5):25-29. https://www.aafp.org/link_out?pmid=22991907

  • Tran B, Lenhart A, Ross R, Dorr DA. Burnout and EHR use among academic primary care physicians with varied clinical workloads. AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2019;2019:136-144. eCollection 2019. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/31258965/

  • Melnick ER, Fong A, Nath B, et al. Analysis of electronic health record use and clinical productivity and their association with physician turnover. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(10):e2128790. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.28790

  • Yan Q, Jiang Z, Harbin Z, Tolbert PH, Davies MG. Exploring the relationship between electronic health records and provider burnout: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021;28(5):1009-1021. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocab009

Sign in to take quiz and track your certificates

AMA Steps Forward logo

AMA STEPS Forward® presents actionable, practical toolkits and customizable resources that you can use to successfully implement meaningful and transformative change in your practice or organization. See How it Works

Successful completion of this CME activity, which includes participation in the evaluation component, enables the participant to earn up to:

0.25 Medical Knowledge MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine's (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program;

0.25 Self-Assessment points in the American Board of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery’s (ABOHNS) Continuing Certification program;

0.25 MOC points in the American Board of Pediatrics’ (ABP) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program; and

0.25 Lifelong Learning points in the American Board of Pathology’s (ABPath) Continuing Certification program;

It is the CME activity provider's responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting MOC credit.

Article Information

AMA CME Accreditation Information

Credit Designation Statement: The American Medical Association designates this enduring material activity for a maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

CME Disclosure Statement: Unless noted, all individuals in control of content reported no relevant financial relationships.

If applicable, all relevant financial relationships have been mitigated.

Disclaimer: AMA STEPS Forward® content is provided for informational purposes only, is believed to be current and accurate at the time of posting, and is not intended as, and should not be construed to be, legal, financial, medical, or consulting advice. Physicians and other users should seek competent legal, financial, medical, and consulting advice. AMA STEPS Forward® content provides information on commercial products, processes, and services for informational purposes only. The AMA does not endorse or recommend any commercial products, processes, or services and mention of the same in AMA STEPS Forward® content is not an endorsement or recommendation. The AMA hereby disclaims all express and implied warranties of any kind related to any third-party content or offering. The AMA expressly disclaims all liability for damages of any kind arising out of use, reference to, or reliance on AMA STEPS Forward® content.

About the AMA Professional Satisfaction and Practice Sustainability Group

The AMA Professional Satisfaction and Practice Sustainability group is committed to making the patient–physician relationship more valued than paperwork, technology an asset and not a burden, and physician burnout a thing of the past. We are focused on improving—and setting a positive future path for—the operational, financial, and technological aspects of a physician's practice. To learn more, visit https://www.ama-assn.org/practice-management/ama-steps-forward.

References:
1.
Sinsky  C, Colligan  L, Ling  L,  et al Allocation of physician time in ambulatory practice: a time and motion study in 4 specialties.  Ann Intern Med. 2016;165(11):753–760. doi:10.7326/M16-0961Google ScholarCrossref
2.
Akbar  F, Mark  G, Warton  EM,  et al.  Physicians' electronic inbox work patterns and factors associated with high inbox work duration.  J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021;28(5):923–930. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocaa229Google ScholarCrossref
3.
Lieu  TA, Warton  EM, East  JA,  et al.  Evaluation of attention switching and duration of electronic inbox work among primary care physicians.  JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(1):e2031856. Published 2021 Jan 4 . doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.31856Google ScholarCrossref

Disclaimer: AMA STEPS Forward® content is provided for informational purposes only, is believed to be current and accurate at the time of posting, and is not intended as, and should not be construed to be, legal, financial, medical, or consulting advice. Physicians and other users should seek competent legal, financial, medical, and consulting advice. AMA STEPS Forward® content provides information on commercial products, processes, and services for informational purposes only. The AMA does not endorse or recommend any commercial products, processes, or services and mention of the same in AMA STEPS Forward® content is not an endorsement or recommendation. The AMA hereby disclaims all express and implied warranties of any kind related to any third-party content or offering. The AMA expressly disclaims all liability for damages of any kind arising out of use, reference to, or reliance on AMA STEPS Forward® content.

Close
Close
Close
Close

Name Your Search

Save Search
Close
Close

Lookup An Activity

or

My Saved Searches

You currently have no searches saved.

Close

My Saved Courses

You currently have no courses saved.

Close